Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Warehouse Area Transformation as a Driver of Compact City Development: The Case of Warsaw Cover

Warehouse Area Transformation as a Driver of Compact City Development: The Case of Warsaw

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Act of 27 March 2003 on spatial planning and development. Online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20030800717/U/D20030717Lj.pdf(accessed 14 November 2024).
  2. Act of 5 July 2018 on facilitations in the preparation and implementation of housing investments and accompanying investments. Online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20180001496/U/D20181496Lj.pdf(accessed 14 November 2024).
  3. Act of 7 July 2023 amending the Act on spatial planning and development and certain other acts. Online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20230001688/T/D20231688L.pdf(accessed 14 November 2024).
  4. Agostini P., Vega A., 2009. Decision support systems (DSSs) for contaminated land management – Gaps and challenges. In: Marcomini A., Suter G.W., Critto A. (eds), Decision support systems for risk-based management of contaminated sites. Springer US, Boston: 275–280.
  5. Aleha A., Zahra S.M., Qureshi S., Marri S.A., Siddique S., Hussain S.S., 2023. Urban void as an urban catalyst bridging the gap between the community. Frontiers in Built Environment 9: 1–15. DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1068897
  6. Antoniak-Tęskna P., 2020. City centre development in the light of the revised building technical requirements. Nieruchomości@ 2(II): 23–33. DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1588
  7. Artico D., 2017. Urban visibility changes as an effect of the redefinition of minorities in Poland after 1989. Acta Histriae 25(3): 613–628. DOI 10.19233/AH.2017.29
  8. Badelow F., Wakefield M., Chandrasegaran C., Iseppi G., 2014. Barangaroo South harbourside basement, Australia, challenges and solutions. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Geotechnical Engineering 167(2): 194–204. DOI 10.1680/geng.13.00031
  9. Cahantimur A.I., Öztürk R.B., Öztürk A.C., 2010. Securing land for urban transformation through sustainable brownfield regeneration – The case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Environment and Urbanization 22(1): 241–258. DOI 10.1177/0956247809362641
  10. Calthorpe P., 1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
  11. Chmielewski J.M., 2010. Teoria urbanistyki w projektowaniu i planowaniu miast (Theory of urban planning in city design). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warsaw.
  12. Chmielewski J.M., 2016. Teoria i praktyka planowania przestrzennego. Urbanistyka Europy (Theory and practice of spatial planning. Urbanism in Europe). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warsaw.
  13. Colten C.E., 1990. Historical hazards: The geography of relict industrial wastes. The Professional Geographer 42: 143–156. DOI 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1990.00143.x
  14. Dąbrowska-Milewska G., 2010. Standardy urbanistyczne dla terenów mieszkaniowych – wybrane zagadnienia (Urban planning standards for residential areas – Selected issues). Architecturae et Artibus 2(1): 17–31.
  15. de Andrade A.C., da Cunha R.C., 2023. The ways of growth and the morphological-functional zoning of the medium city of Itajubá (Minas Gerais). Geo UERJ 43: e55439. DOI 10.12957/geouerj.2023.55439
  16. de Biase C., Losco S., 2018. Generational equity in Italian urban-planning: Urban standards. Green Energy and Technology: 487–500. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_38
  17. Doan L.V.L., Rae A., 2023. Are we looking in the right place? Housing search mismatches: Evidence from Greater Manchester in the UK. Open House International 48(4): 683–703. DOI 10.1108/ohi-06-2022-0145
  18. Dong H., Hansz J.A., 2019. Zoning, density, and rising housing prices: A case study in Portland, Oregon. Urban Studies 56(16): 3486–3503. DOI 10.1177/0042098018813251
  19. Fijałkowska A., 2014. Measuring inhabitants quality of life using GIS-based accessibility analysis. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2014 2(3): 739–746. DOI 10.5593/SGEM2014/B23/S11.094(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290872691_Measuring_inhabitants_quality_of_life_using_GIS-based_accessibility_analysis).
  20. Gasidło K., 1998. Problemy przekształceń terenów poprzemysłowych (Challenges of post-industrial land transformation). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
  21. Goswami G., Bulsara H.P., 2025. Impact of support services and accessibility on residential satisfaction: Empirical evidence from Surat city. International Journal of Procurement Management 22(3): 297–312. DOI 10.1504/IJPM.2025.144347
  22. Grabkowska M., 2018. Urban space as a commons in print media discourse in Poland after 1989. Cities 72: 122–129. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.013
  23. Guida C., Carpentieri G., Masoumi H., 2022. Measuring spatial accessibility to urban services for older adults: An application to healthcare facilities in Milan. European Transport Research Review 14: 45. DOI 10.1186/s12544-022-00544-3
  24. Gzell S., 2015. Wykłady o współczesnej urbanistyce (Lectures on contemporary urbanism). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warsaw.
  25. Habrel M., Denis M., Majewska A., Habrel M., Izdebski M., Fenchuk O., 2024. Delimitation of the metropolitan areas of Warsaw and Lviv over the last 100 years. The Polish-Ukrainian experience. Cities 144: 104664. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104664
  26. Hammond E.B., Coulon F., Hallett S.H., Thomas R., Hardy D., Kingdon A.I., Beriro D.J., 2021. A critical review of decision support systems for brownfield redevelopment. Science of the Total Environment 785: 147132. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147132
  27. Heerten L., 2024. An imperial adventus into a city of warehouses: History, modernity, and urbanity in the symbolic and material construction of Hamburg’s free port. Central European History 57(3): 311–337. DOI 10.1017/s0008938923000845
  28. Huang J., Wang Y., Wu K., Yue X., Zhang H., 2024. Livability-oriented urban built environment: What kind of built environment can increase the housing prices? Journal of Urban Management 13(3): 357–371. DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2024.04.001
  29. Huysegoms L., Cappuyns V., 2017. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options. Journal of Environmental Management 196: 278–296. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.002
  30. Hwang S.W., Lee S.J., 2019. Unused, underused, and misused: An examination of theories on urban void spaces. Urban Research and Practice 13(5): 1–17. DOI 10.1080/17535069.2019.1634140
  31. Ibáñez León C., Ríos Sapa E.L., 2020. Hafencity-Speicherstadt, accesibilidad y patrimonio en la regeneración de un conjunto urbano. Loggia, Arquitectura and Restauración 33: 8–19. DOI 10.4995/loggia.2020.10797
  32. Kazimierczak J., Kosmowski P., 2018. Post-industrial urban areas in the context of ruination, demolition and urban regeneration in a post-socialist city: Experiences of Łódź, Poland. Finisterra 53(109): 35–51. DOI 10.18055/finis12092
  33. Korcelli-Olejniczak E., 2015. On city-region relations. Towards the urban-rural region of Warsaw. Mitteilungen Der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 157: 129–149. DOI 10.1553/moegg157s129
  34. Kurvinen A., Wiley J., 2019. Retail development externalities for housing values. Journal of Housing Research 28(1): 109–128. DOI 10.1080/10835547.2019.12092155
  35. Kusiak J., 2017. Chaos Warszawa. Porządki przestrzenne polskiego kapitalizmu (Warsaw in chaos: Spatial patterns of Polish capitalism). Fundacja Nowej Kultury Bęc Zmiana, Warsaw.
  36. Lee K.O., Cheng S.F., 2023. Neighborhood retail amenities and taxi trip behavior: A natural experiment in Singapore. Habitat International 131: 102714. DOI 10.1016/j.habitatappint.2022.102714
  37. Lis P., Rataj Z., Suszyńska K., 2022. Implementation risk factors of collaborative housing in Poland: The case of “Nowe Żerniki” in Wrocław. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15(3): 101. DOI 10.3390/jrfm15030101
  38. Lopez-Pineiro S., 2020. The limit toward emptiness: Urban voids as public space. Landscape Architecture Frontiers 8(5): 120–129. DOI 10.15302/j-laf-1-030020
  39. Luo D., Cats O., van Lint H., Currie G., 2019. Integrating network science and public transport accessibility analysis for comparative assessment. Journal of Transport Geography 80: 102505. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102505
  40. Maciejewska A., Kuzak Ł, Ulanicka-Raczyńska M., Moreau K., 2022. Land management using land reserves to alleviate emergencies on the example of Warsaw. Sustainability 14(18): 11625. DOI 10.3390/su141811625
  41. Maciejewska A., Kuzak Ł, Ulanicka-Raczyńska M., Onufriv Y., 2023. Use of field reserves in emergencies as assessed by urban residents and refugees in Warsaw and Lviv during the war in Ukraine. Sustainability 15(18): 14022. DOI 10.3390/su151814022
  42. Maciejewska A., Turek A., 2019. Rewitalizacja terenów poprzemysłowych (Revitalisation of post-industrial areas). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.
  43. Mahzouni A., 2015. The “policy mix” for sustainable urban transition: The city district of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm. Environmental Policy and Governance 25(4): 288–302. DOI 10.1002/eet.1688
  44. Majewska A., Denis M., Jarecka-Bidzińska E., Jaroszewicz J., Krupowicz W., 2022. Pandemic resilient cities: Possibilities of repairing Polish towns and cities during COVID-19 pandemic. Land Use Policy 113: 105904. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105904
  45. Malczewski J., 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
  46. Maquiaveli J., 2012. Passando a limpo: um passeio pelos processos e pelos projetos de revitalização urbana do Meatpacking District, em Nova York, e da Região da Luz, em São Paulo. EURE (Santiago) 38(115): 137–158. DOI 10.4067/S0250-71612012000300007
  47. Martinat S., Navratil J., Hollander J.B., Trojan J., Klapka P., Klusacek P., Kalok D., 2018. Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city. Journal of Cleaner Production 188: 536–545. DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313
  48. Martinez F.J.B., 2017. Los vacíos urbanos: una nueva definición. Revista Urbano 20(35): 114–122. DOI 10.22320/07813607.2017.20.35.09
  49. Namangaya A., Kiunsi R., 2018. Assessing the influences of service provision on pace and short and medium term development patterns of residential housing in Dar es Salaam. Geografisk Tidsskrift – Danish Journal of Geography 118(2): 151–159. DOI 10.1080/00167223.2018.1500490
  50. Nieroda B., Gwizdak W., 2019. Zabudowa śródmiejska. Reaktywacja? (Inner-city development: A reactivation?). Zawód: Architekt 68: 88–95.
  51. Novack P.N., Hidalgo R., 2018. Políticas de vivienda para áreas centrales: una revisión de literatura. GEOgraphia 20(44): 60–70. DOI 10.22409/geographia2018.v1i44.a14343
  52. Ostręga A., Szewczyk-Świątek A., Cała M., Dybeł P., 2024. Obsolete mining buildings and the circular economy on the example of a coal mine from Poland —Adaptation or demolition and building anew? Sustainability 16(17): 7493. DOI 10.3390/su16177493
  53. Özer S., Jacoby S., 2023. Space standards in affordable housing in England. Building Research & Information, 52(6): 611–626. DOI 10.1080/09613218.2023.2253337
  54. Panattoni Europe, 2024. Brownfield: Why the revitalisation of old industrial sites is the future of the real estate industry. Online: https://panattonieurope.com/en-de/newsroom/brownfield-why-the-revitalisation-of-old-industrial-sites-is-the-future-of-the-real-estate-industry (accessed 14 November 2024)
  55. Pandis Iveroth S., Vernay A.L., Mulder K.F., Brandt N., 2013. Implications of systems integration at the urban level: The case of Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm. Journal of Cleaner Production 48: 220–231. DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.012
  56. Parekh D.P., 2024. 15-minute cities: A systems thinking analysis of a new urban development framework: Using an agent based approach (ABA) to analyse the 15-minute city global framework and assess its effectiveness, opportunities, limitations, and potential as a new model for sustainable urban development. In: Siew G., Allam Z., Cheshmehzangi A. (eds), Urban sustainability. Springer, Singapore: 89–104. DOI 10.1007/978-981-97-8776-0_5
  57. Piegza M., Rabiej J., 2023. Conversion of post-industrial architecture for residential usage – Analysis of selected examples in Poland centred around the criteria of the definition of loft. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe 41: 50–64. DOI 10.4467/25438700sm.22.030.17153
  58. Pluta A., 2020. Pustostany miejskie w kontekście zrównoważonego rozwoju osiedli mieszkaniowych (Urban vacancies in the context of sustainable housing estate development). In: Soliman K.S. (ed.), A 2025 vision to sustain economic development during global challenges. International Business Information Management Association (IBI-MA), Sevilla: 17424–17432.
  59. Powe N.A., Gunn S., 2008. Housing development in market towns: Making a success of ‘local service centres’? Town Planning Review 79(1): 125–148. DOI 10.3828/tpr.79.1.7
  60. Rae A., Sener E., 2016. How website users segment a city: The geography of housing search in London. Cities 52: 140–147. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.12.002
  61. Rall E.L., Haase D., 2011. Creative intervention in a dynamic city: A sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 100(3): 189–201. DOI 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2010.12.004
  62. Saaty T., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York.
  63. Sarlas G., Páez A., Axhausen K.W., 2020. Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks. Journal of Transport Geography 84: 102680. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102680
  64. Schneider-Skalska G., 2004. Kształtowanie zdrowego środowiska mieszkaniowego. Wybrane zagadnienia (Shaping a healthy residential environment. Selected issues). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej, Krakow.
  65. Taplin J.H.E., Sun Y., 2020. Optimizing bus stop locations for walking access: Stops-first design of a feeder route to enhance a residential plan. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47(8): 1341–1356. DOI 10.1177/2399808318824108
  66. Tellier L.N., Quesnel F., Bur J., 2024. Estimating urban sprawl standards by means of the Urban Metric System. Regional Science Policy and Practice 16(11): 100131. DOI 10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100131
  67. Tennøy A., Pinchasik D.R., Gundersen F., Hovi I.B., 2020. Net CO2-emission effects of relocating freight facilities to free up land for urban development in central and semi-central urban areas. Cities 101: 102702. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102702
  68. Tiznado-Aitken I., Lucas K., Muñoz J.C., Hurtubia R., 2020. Understanding accessibility through public transport users’ experiences: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Transport Geography 88: 102857. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102857
  69. Toan T.D., 2022. Transit-oriented development for Hanoi sustainable urban development. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 203: 1457–1465. DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7160-9_147
  70. Turek A., 2013. Rewitalizacja obszarów poprzemysłowych na cele mieszkaniowe (Revitalisation of post-industrial areas for residential purposes). Problemy Rozwoju Miast 10(1): 71–86.
  71. Turner K., 2018. NYC’s Meatpacking District: How the neighborhood went from meat to chic. StreetEasy. Online: https://streeteasy.com/blog/meatpacking-district-nyc/(accessed 14 November 2024)
  72. van Eck J.R., Burghouwt G., Dijst M., 2005. Lifestyles, spatial configurations and quality of life in daily travel: An explorative simulation study. Journal of Transport Geography 13(2): 123–134. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.04.013
  73. van Liedekerke M., Prokop G., Rabl-Berger S., Kibblewhite M., Louwagie G., 2013. Progress in the management. European Commission, Luxembourg.
  74. Wanfu J., Chunshan Z., Tao L., Guojun Z., 2019. Exploring the factors affecting regional land development patterns at different developmental stages: Evidence from 289 Chinese cities. Cities 91: 193–201. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.019
  75. Willberg E., Fink C., Toivonen T., 2023. The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography 106: 103521. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103521
  76. Williams K., Dair C., 2007. A framework for assessing the sustainability of brownfield development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(1): 23–40. DOI 10.1080/09640560601048275
  77. Yoshimura Y., Kumakoshi Y., Milardo S., Santi P., Arias J.M., Koizumi H., Ratti C., 2021. Revisiting Jane Jacobs: Quantifying urban diversity. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49(4): 1228–1244. DOI 10.1177/23998083211050935
  78. Zotic V., Alexandru D.-E., Puiu V., 2010. Functional zoning of the city/village area and its contribution to the sustainable development of settlements. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 1(2): 181–189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2025-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 105 - 124
Submitted on: Dec 4, 2024
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2025 Łukasz Kuzak, Maciej Izdebski, Alina Maciejewska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.