Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Incidence of Oscheius onirici (Nematoda: Rhabditidae), a potentially entomopathogenic nematode from the marshlands of Wisconsin, USA Cover

Incidence of Oscheius onirici (Nematoda: Rhabditidae), a potentially entomopathogenic nematode from the marshlands of Wisconsin, USA

Open Access
|May 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Oscheius onirici female. (A) Entire body. (B) Pharyngeal region. (C) Lateral view of vulva region and lateral field. (D) Schematic representation of En-face view of lip region. (E) Lateral view of tail region.
Oscheius onirici female. (A) Entire body. (B) Pharyngeal region. (C) Lateral view of vulva region and lateral field. (D) Schematic representation of En-face view of lip region. (E) Lateral view of tail region.

Figure 2

Photographs of Oscheius onirici female. (A) Entire body (arrow showing vulva). (B) Pharyngeal region (arrow showing excretory pore). (C) Head region. (D, E) Lateral view of vulva region (arrow showing vulva). (F) Lateral view of tail region (arrow showing anus). (G) Basal bulb (arrow showing excretory pore).
Photographs of Oscheius onirici female. (A) Entire body (arrow showing vulva). (B) Pharyngeal region (arrow showing excretory pore). (C) Head region. (D, E) Lateral view of vulva region (arrow showing vulva). (F) Lateral view of tail region (arrow showing anus). (G) Basal bulb (arrow showing excretory pore).

Figure 3

Scanning electron microscope photographs of Oscheius onirici female. (A) Lip region en-face view showing one amphideal aperture (am), six labial sensilla (ls) and two cephalic sensilla (cs). (B) Excrotory pore. (C) Ventral view of vulva. (D) Lateral lines. (E) Entire body lateral view (arrow showing vulva). (F) Esophageal region (arrow showing excretory pore). (G) Lateral field showing lateral lines. (H) Tail region ventral view (Top arrow showing four bacteria, middle arrow showing anus, two bottom arrows showing phasmids).
Scanning electron microscope photographs of Oscheius onirici female. (A) Lip region en-face view showing one amphideal aperture (am), six labial sensilla (ls) and two cephalic sensilla (cs). (B) Excrotory pore. (C) Ventral view of vulva. (D) Lateral lines. (E) Entire body lateral view (arrow showing vulva). (F) Esophageal region (arrow showing excretory pore). (G) Lateral field showing lateral lines. (H) Tail region ventral view (Top arrow showing four bacteria, middle arrow showing anus, two bottom arrows showing phasmids).

Figure 4

Bayesian consensus tree inferred from 18S under GTR+I+G model (−ln L = 5789.8442; AIC = 11599.6885; freqA = 0.2657; freqC = 0.202; freqG = 0.258; freqT = 0.2743; R(a) = 0.9275; R(b) = 3.6026; R(c) = 2.6802; R(d) = 0.6926; R(e) = 6.3237; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.4134; Shape = 0.6825). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.
Bayesian consensus tree inferred from 18S under GTR+I+G model (−ln L = 5789.8442; AIC = 11599.6885; freqA = 0.2657; freqC = 0.202; freqG = 0.258; freqT = 0.2743; R(a) = 0.9275; R(b) = 3.6026; R(c) = 2.6802; R(d) = 0.6926; R(e) = 6.3237; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.4134; Shape = 0.6825). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.

Figure 5

Bayesian consensus tree inferred from 28S D2/D3 under GTR+I+G model (−ln L = 4799.2056; AIC = 9618.4111; freqA = 0.2557; freqC = 0.182; freqG = 0.2892; freqT = 0.2732; R(a) = 0.6259; R(b) = 2.263; R(c) = 1.6102; R(d) = 0.5689; R(e) = 5.2205; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.2558; Shape = 0.6827). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.
Bayesian consensus tree inferred from 28S D2/D3 under GTR+I+G model (−ln L = 4799.2056; AIC = 9618.4111; freqA = 0.2557; freqC = 0.182; freqG = 0.2892; freqT = 0.2732; R(a) = 0.6259; R(b) = 2.263; R(c) = 1.6102; R(d) = 0.5689; R(e) = 5.2205; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.2558; Shape = 0.6827). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.

Figure 6

Bayesian consensus tree inferred from ITS under TVM+I model (−ln L = 9235.373; AIC = 18488.7461; freqA = 0.2255; freqC = 0.2115; freqG = 0.2393; freqT = 0.3237; R(a) = 1.3757; R(b) = 3.2802; R(c) = 1.847; R(d) = 1.2014; R(e) = 3.2802; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.1375; Shape = 1.5896). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.
Bayesian consensus tree inferred from ITS under TVM+I model (−ln L = 9235.373; AIC = 18488.7461; freqA = 0.2255; freqC = 0.2115; freqG = 0.2393; freqT = 0.3237; R(a) = 1.3757; R(b) = 3.2802; R(c) = 1.847; R(d) = 1.2014; R(e) = 3.2802; R(f) = 1; Pinva = 0.1375; Shape = 1.5896). Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades.

Figure 7A

The mortality rates for different insect types treated with either an Oscheius onirici population, or a control treatment of two milliliters of distilled water. (B) The average number of days that it took for a larva to die after exposure to the treatment. Insects were treated with either an Oscheius onirici population, or a control treatment of two milliliters of distilled water.
The mortality rates for different insect types treated with either an Oscheius onirici population, or a control treatment of two milliliters of distilled water. (B) The average number of days that it took for a larva to die after exposure to the treatment. Insects were treated with either an Oscheius onirici population, or a control treatment of two milliliters of distilled water.

Morphometrics of female Oscheius onirici_

Measurement or ratio16-34833WisconsinPS2068OregonJul179FranceDFL2014a Italy
N20131420
L615-830 (733.3 ± 63.8)610-830 (670.4 ± 54.0)565 – 835 (645.4 ± 69.3)584-801 (671 ± 65.5)
a13.5-36 (16.3 ± 4.6)4.8-23.3 (18.1 ± 4.3)14.1-21.4 (16.2 ± 1.8)15.8 – 22.5 (19 ± 2)
b4.8-6.5 (5.6 ± 0.4)3.3-6.4 (5.1 ± 0.7)3.9-5.4 (4.3 ± 0.4)4.4 – 6.0 (4.9 ± 0.5)
c8.1-15.4 (10.6 ± 2.1)3.6-9.4 (7.6 ± 1.5)6.1-9.9 (7.4 ± 1.1)8.6 – 11.8 (9.7 ± 0.9)
c'2.2-4.8 (3.5 ± 0.7)3.7-5.7 (4.6 ± 0.7)3.5-5.8 (4.8 ± 0.7)3.5-5.0 (4.3 ± 0.4)
V47.3-53.2 (50.6 ± 1.3)47.2-51.5 (49.7 ± 1.2)37.7-53.9 (49.3 ± 3.9)47.3 – 52.6 (51.0 ± 1.3)
Pharynx118-154 (132.0 ± 11.3)104-190 (134.7 ± 18.3)135-163 (148.4 ± 6.7)126-146 (137 ± 6.2)
Midbody width20-55 (46.8 ± 7.4)30-131 (42.8 ± 25.8)34-46 (40.0 ± 3.4)30-51 (36.0 ± 5.3)
Tail40-95 (72.1 ± 26.3)74-176 (93.3 ± 34.9)72-102 (87.6 ± 8.3)63-81 (69 ± 5.5)
ABW16-38 (21 ± 7.6)15-44 (20.8 ± 9.0)16-29 (18.5 ± 3.4)13-23 (16 ± 2.2)
Stoma length14-22 (17.6 ± 1.9)16-19 (17.7 ± 1.1)18-29 (20.9 ± 2.4)12-16 (14 ± 1.1)
Stoma diameter3-5 (4.1 ± 0.5)3-5 (4.1 ± 0.5)4-5 (4.2 ± 0.4)3-4 (4 ± 0.4)
Basal bulb length24-45 (30.5 ± 5.4)25-30 (27.6 ± 1.8)20-31 (26.6 ± 3.4)21-25 (23 ± 1.3)
Basal bulb width19-28 (22.9 ± 2.6)16-26 (19.7 ± 3.1)18-27 (23.3 ± 3.1)17-21 (19 ± 1.2)
EP (Anterior end to excretory pore)88-130 (113.1 ± 28.4)95-122 (109.3 ± 8.6)100-133 (112.7 ± 8.2)92-146 (108 ± 13.2)
D (%)72.4-100.8 (87.6 ± 7.1)70.9-92.5 (83.19 ± 6.3)64.5-88.9 (77.4 ± 7.1)63.4-101.7 (78.9 ± 9.6)
Stoma length/stoma diameter3.6-5.5 (4.3 ± 0.5)1.9-6 (4.2 ± 0.9)1.12-5.50 (4.6 ± 1.1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2018-004 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 26
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2017
|
Published on: May 31, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Weimin Ye, Shane Foye, Ann E. MacGuidwin, Shawn Steffan, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.