Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China Cover

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Light micrographs of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). Female: A, Pharynx; B–D, Lip region arrow showing amphid; E, Gonad; F, Tail region arrow showing position of anus G, Tail region arrows showing position of caudal pores; H, Ventral view of vulva; I, Vulval region (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–D = 10 μm; E = 50 μm; F–I = 10 μm).
Light micrographs of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). Female: A, Pharynx; B–D, Lip region arrow showing amphid; E, Gonad; F, Tail region arrow showing position of anus G, Tail region arrows showing position of caudal pores; H, Ventral view of vulva; I, Vulval region (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–D = 10 μm; E = 50 μm; F–I = 10 μm).

Fig. 2

Light micrographs of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).
Light micrographs of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Fig. 3

Scanning electron microscopy of Paralongidorus Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–C, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), cephalic lobe (cl), cephalic papillae (cp), oral aperture (oa), and amphidial aperture (aa). D–E, Female tail in lateral and ventral view (a = anus). F–G: Vulval region (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–C = 5 μm; D = 30 μm; E,F = 10 μm; G = 20 μm).
Scanning electron microscopy of Paralongidorus Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–C, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), cephalic lobe (cl), cephalic papillae (cp), oral aperture (oa), and amphidial aperture (aa). D–E, Female tail in lateral and ventral view (a = anus). F–G: Vulval region (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–C = 5 μm; D = 30 μm; E,F = 10 μm; G = 20 μm).

Fig. 5

Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). Female: A, Pharynx; B–E, Lip regions; F, Gonad; G–H, Pharyngeal bulb; I, Entire female body; J–K, Vulval regions; L, ventral view of tail; M–O, Female tails (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–E, G–H, J–O = 10 μm; F = 20; I = 500 μm; am) = amphid; bp = body pores; v = vulva; svn = subventrolateral nuclei; dn = dorsal nuclei; a = anus).
Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). Female: A, Pharynx; B–E, Lip regions; F, Gonad; G–H, Pharyngeal bulb; I, Entire female body; J–K, Vulval regions; L, ventral view of tail; M–O, Female tails (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–E, G–H, J–O = 10 μm; F = 20; I = 500 μm; am) = amphid; bp = body pores; v = vulva; svn = subventrolateral nuclei; dn = dorsal nuclei; a = anus).

Fig. 6

Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). Male and first-stage juvenile. A, Entire body of male; B, Anterior region of male; C, Tail region of male arrows showing position of supplements (spl); D, Entire body of J1; E, ANterior region of J1 arrows showing position of guiding ring (gr) and replacement odontostyle (rodt); F–G, Tail regions of J1. (Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B–C = 40 μm; D = 100 μm; E–G = 10 μm).
Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). Male and first-stage juvenile. A, Entire body of male; B, Anterior region of male; C, Tail region of male arrows showing position of supplements (spl); D, Entire body of J1; E, ANterior region of J1 arrows showing position of guiding ring (gr) and replacement odontostyle (rodt); F–G, Tail regions of J1. (Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B–C = 40 μm; D = 100 μm; E–G = 10 μm).

Fig. 7

Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).
Light micrographs of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Fig. 8

Scanning electron microscopy of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), oral aperture (oa), stylet (st), and amphidial aperture (aa); E–F, Female tail in lateral view (a = anus); G–H, Vulval region in lateral and ventral view (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–D = 5 μm; E = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; G–H = 30 μm).
Scanning electron microscopy of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), oral aperture (oa), stylet (st), and amphidial aperture (aa); E–F, Female tail in lateral view (a = anus); G–H, Vulval region in lateral and ventral view (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–D = 5 μm; E = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; G–H = 30 μm).

Fig. 9

Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (▲ = Odontostyle and ● = replacement odontostyle); length in three developmental stages and mature females of Longidorus jonesi.
Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (▲ = Odontostyle and ● = replacement odontostyle); length in three developmental stages and mature females of Longidorus jonesi.

Fig. 10

Phylogenetic relationships within Longidorus and Paralongidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G: –lnL = 14601.9935; AIC = 29619.9870; freqA = 0.2204; freqC = 0.2274; freqG = 0.2934; freqT = 0.2588; R(a) = 0.7487; R(b) = 2.4740; R(c) = 1.4407; R(d) = 0.3992; R(e) = 4.6932; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.2290; and Shape = 0.6290). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.
Phylogenetic relationships within Longidorus and Paralongidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G: –lnL = 14601.9935; AIC = 29619.9870; freqA = 0.2204; freqC = 0.2274; freqG = 0.2934; freqT = 0.2588; R(a) = 0.7487; R(b) = 2.4740; R(c) = 1.4407; R(d) = 0.3992; R(e) = 4.6932; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.2290; and Shape = 0.6290). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Fig. 11

Phylogenetic relationships within Longidorus and Paralongidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequence alignment under a transitional of invariable sites model with invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (TIM2  + I + G: –lnL = 6866.9821; AIC = 14129.9643; freqA = 0.2626; freqC = 0.2109; freqG = 0.2668; freqT = 0.2597; R(a) = 1.8892; R(b) = 3.9662; R(c) = 1.8892; R(d) = 1.0000; R(e) = 7.1009; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.7060; and Shape = 0.6020). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.
Phylogenetic relationships within Longidorus and Paralongidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequence alignment under a transitional of invariable sites model with invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (TIM2  + I + G: –lnL = 6866.9821; AIC = 14129.9643; freqA = 0.2626; freqC = 0.2109; freqG = 0.2668; freqT = 0.2597; R(a) = 1.8892; R(b) = 3.9662; R(c) = 1.8892; R(d) = 1.0000; R(e) = 7.1009; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.7060; and Shape = 0.6020). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Morphometrics of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al_, 1963)_ All measurements are in micrometer and in the form: mean ± s_d_ (range)_

Characters/ratiosJ1J2J4Females
n2581330
L1290 ± 46 (1205–1429)1636 ± 116 (1621–1695)2199 ± 204 (1819–2592)3089 ± 243 (2647–3494)
a52.3 ± 2.4 (46.3–56.8)51.9 ± 2.5 (48.9–56)52.4 ± 5.2 (43–57.8)55.9 ± 4.4 (49.3–64.6)
b4.4 ± 0.5 (3.8–5.9)4.8 ± 0.3 (4.6–5.3)5.7 ± 1 (3.9–7.6)6.6 ± 0.5 (5.7–7.8)
c59.4 ± 6.3 (48.5–78.9)66.4–4.2 (58.8–73.1)90.2 ± 10.8 (71.5–109.4)128.7 ± 9.1 (111.9–142)
c1.17 ± 0.11 (0.9–1.37)0.97 ± 0.12 (0.72–1.11)0.78 ± 0.08 (0.68–0.96)0.65 ± 0.05 (0.56–0.78)
V48.6 ± 1.7 (46.2–54.3)
Total stylet127.8 ± 3.4 (120.0–137.0)148.2 ± 3.2 (143.0–154.0)158.2 ± 5.0 (149.0–165.0)186.8 ± 4.4 (179.0–196.0)
Odontostyle77.9 ± 2 (75.0–84.0)90.8 ± 1.6 (89.0–94.0)100.7 ± 2.7 (95.0–104.0)117.4 ± 3.3 (112.0–124.5)
Odontophore50.0 ± 2.5 (44.0–54.056.7 ± 2.6 (52.0–61.0)58 ± 4.2 (51.0–63.0)68.9 ± 1.9 (66.0–74.0)
Replacement Odontostyle89.8 ± 1.9 (87.0–93.0)101.2 ± 1.8 (99.0–104.0)115.3 ± 3.6 (108.0–123.0)
Oral aperture to guide ring23.9 ± 0.4 (23.0–25.0)29.6 ± 0.8 (28.0–31.0)33.7 ± 1.1 (32.0–35.0)39.2 ± 1.2 (37.0–41.0)
Lip region width7.7 ± 0.6 (7.0–9.0)8.1 ± 0.5 (7.0–9.0)9.3 ± 0.6 (9.0–10.0)10.4 ± 0.5 (9.0–11.0)
Body width at guide ring14.9 ± 0.4 (14.0–16.0)17.3 ± 0.5 (17.0–18.0)20.4 ± 0.8 (20.0–22.0)23.4 ± 0.7 (22.0–25.0)
Anal body width18.8 ± 0.8 (18.0–22.0)24.5 ± 1.9 (21.0–27.0)31.2 ± 2.2 (27.0–35.0)36.7 ± 1.9 (33.5–41.0)
Tail length21.9 ± 2.2 (17.0–26.5)23.8 ± 2.1 (20.0–27.0)24.4 ± 2.7 (22.0–31.0)24 ± 1.7 (21.0–27.0)
Anterior end to vulva1497 ± 111 (1287–1663)
Pharynx298.2 ± 25.8 (217.0–340.06)341.1 ± 24.6 (295–376.8)393 ± 40.7 (311–462)470.7 ± 32 (413.4–528.7)
Body width at vulva53.8 ± 5.5 (48–67.4)
Hyaline tail4.8 ± 0.4 (4.0–5.5)5.8 ± 0.5 (5.0–6.5)6.6 ± 0.7 (6.0–8.0)8.5 ± 0.7 (7.0–10.0)
Max body diameter24.7 ± 1.5 (22.5–28.0)31.6 ± 2.9 (27.0–36.0)42.5 ± 7.4 (33.0–60.0)55.5 ± 5.9 (45.0–69.0)

Morphometrics of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962)_ All measurements are in µm and in the form: mean  ±  s_d_ (range)_

Characters/ratiosJ1J2J3J4FemalesMales
n4207392
L1227 ± 39 (1183–1278)1440 ± 62 (1340–1571)1603 ± 79 (1505–1756)2570 ± 203 (2379–2784)3534 ± 242 (3153–3785)2619 ± 243 (2447–2791)
a54.5 ± 4.2 (48.7–58.4)54.4 ± 2.4 (50.7–59.2)51.8 ± 4.0 (44.5–57.6)52.6 ± 3.8 (48.3–55.6)58.8 ± 3.2 (54.6–64)50.1 ± 7 (45.1–55)
b4.5 ± 0.1 (4.4–4.6)5.4 ± 0.6 (4.6–6.8)4.8 ± 0.6 (4.2–5.4)5.8 ± 0.5 (5.4–6.4)7.7 ± 0.4 (7.2–8.2)5.9 ± 0.8 (5.3–6.5)
c31.9 ± 2.9 (29.3–35.7)34.3 ± 2.6 (31.3–42.5)49.4 ± 5.8 (44.8–61.3)72.5 ± 7.9 (67.9–81.6)104 ± 9 (89.1–116.3)70 ± 4.6 (66.8–73.3)
c′2.4 ± 0.1 (2.3–2.5)2.2 ± 0.2 (1.8–2.4)1.35 ± 0.15 (1.1–1.6)1 ± 0.1 (0.87–1.07)0.84 ± 0.07 (0.73–0.92)0.98 ± 0.07 (0.93–1.03)
V/T48.3 ± 3.3 (44–51.8)84.7 ± 4.7 (81.4–88.0)
Total stylet133.2 ± 2.3 (130.0–135.0)138.1 ± 3.3 (130.0–143.0)152.7 ± 5.8 (145.0–160.0)183 ± 5.4 (179–189.0)216.2 ± 8 (204.0–229.0)198.8 ± 7 (193.8–203.7)
Odontostyle89 ± 3.3 (86.0–94.0)91.3 ± 2.6 (87.0–95.5)98.7±2.2 (95.0–101.0)113.4 ± 2.5 (112–116.0)136.8 ± 2.9 (138.0–143.0)129.3 ± 12.1 (120.7–137.8)
Odontophore44.8 ± 2.6 (42.0–47.0)47 ± 2 (43.0–50.0)53.3 ± 5.7 (46.0–60.0)69.7 ± 6.7 (65.0–77.0)80.3 ± 5.9 (71.0–87.0)73.2 ± 3.7 (70.6–75.8)
Replacement Odontostyle91.8 ± 4.9 (88.0–99.0)98 ± 1.8 (94.0–101.0)115 ± 4.1 (110.0–121.0)134.2 ± 5.5 (131–140.5)
Oral aperture to guide ring40 ± 2.1 (37.0–42.0)39.1 ± 1.6 (36.0–42.0)51.8 ± 3 (45.0–54.0)61.3 ± 2.7 (58.0–63.0)75.9 ± 3.7 (71.0–82.0)71.6 ± 0.2 (71.5–71.8)
Lip region width7.9 ± 0.3 (7.5–8.0)8 ± 0.2 (7.5–9.0)10 ± 0.4 (9.5–10.5)12.5 ± 0.4 (12.0–13.0)14.5 ± 0.7 (14.0–15.5)14.9 ± 0.28 (14.7–15.1)
Body width at guide ring16.8 ± 0.5 (16.0–17.5)17.3 ± 0.7 (16.0–19.0)21.6 ± 1.3 (20.0–24.0)29.3 ± 1.8 (28.0–31.0)35 ± 2.1 (32.5–38.0)33.9 ± 1.8 (32.6–35.1)
Anal body width16 ± 1.7 (15.0–16.5)19 ± 1.7 (17.0–25.0)24.3 ± 1.5 (22.0–26.0)36.1 ± 3.2 (33.0–39.0)40.1 ± 3.6 (35.0–46.0)38.2 ± 3.4 (35.8–40.6)
Tail length38.7 ± 3 (34.0–41.0)42.2 ± 3 (35.0–47.0)32.7 ± 3.1 (26.0–36.0)35.5 ± 1.8 (34.0–37.5)33.1 ± 3.6 (27.0–38.0)37.6 ± 5.9 (33.4–41.8)
Anterior end to vulva1726.5 ± 92.6 (1610–1903)
Pharynx275.6 ± 13.1 (265.0–290.0)267.9 ± 30.1 (199.0–299.0)341 ± 44.2 (303.0–397.0)442.2 ± 26.8 (421–472.5)451.7 ± 36 (404.0–504.0)443.7 ± 19.7 (429.7–457.6)
Body width at vulva58.5 ± 5.5 (53.0–66.0)
Hyaline tail11.2 ± 1.2 (10.0–13.0)11.6 ± 1.3 (9.0–14.5)6.3 ± 0.4 (6.0–7.0)7.3 ± 0.7 (6.5–8.0)7.9 ± 1.1 (7.0–10.0)6.5 ± 1.3 (5.6–7.4)
Max body diameter22.6 ± 1.9 (21.0–25.0)26.9 ± 2.9 (24.0–37.0)31.3 ± 3 (27.0–36.0)49.3 ± 7.6 (43.0–58.0)60.3 ± 5.4 (54.5–67.0)52.5 ± 2.5 (50.7–54.2)
Supplements7–8
Spicule63.4 ± 2.6 (61.5–65.2)

Comparative morphometrics of female of Longidorus jonesi (Siddiqi, 1962) from different localities_ All measurements are in micrometer and in the form: mean ± s_d_ (range)_

Xu and Hooper 1990Xu and Hooper 1990Siddiqi et al. (1962)Palomares-Rius et al. (2014)
LocalityThis studyNanjing (China)Suzhou (China)IndiaJapan
HostCyclobalanopsis glauca (Thumb.) Oerst.Prunus persica (L.) Bastch & Curpressus funebris Endl.Prunus mune(Sleb.)Prunus armeniaca L.Prunus sp.
n91532022
L(mm)3.53 ± 0.24 (3.15–3.79)3.92 ± 0.32 (3.57–4.86)4.37 (3.97–4.81)3.43 (3.17–3.48)3.6 ± 0.3 (2.9–3.9)
a58.8 ± 3.2 (54.6–64)66 ± 4.7 (58–77)64 (61–66)66 (61–75)67.1 ± 7.7 (55.2–84.8)
b7.7 ± 0.4 (7.2–8.2)9.6 ± 1.7 (7.9–14.4)12.0 (10.9–14.3)8.6 (8–9.3)8.1 ± 1.4 (6.5–12.4)
c104 ± 9 (89.1–116.3)131 ± 14.3 (116–170)122 (113–128)167 (140–185)113.3 ± 11.7 (95.9–131.5)
c0.84 ± 0.07 (0.73–0.92)0.8 ± 0.07 (0.7–1.0)0.8 (0.8–0.9)0.75 (0.6–0.87)0.8 ± 0.1 (0.7–0.9)
V48.3 ± 3.3 (44–51.8)49 ± 1.6 (47–52)47 (46–48)50.8 (50–52.4)49.7 ± 1.3 (47.2–51.4)
Total stylet216.2 ± 8 (204.0–229.0)190 ± 5.6 (182.0–206.0)194 (192.0–195.0)182.7 (174.0–192.0)
Odontostyle136.8 ± 2.9 (138.0–143.0)118 ± 4.6 (109.0–131.0)119 (117.0–120.0)113 (107.0–120.0)132.9 ± 5.6 (123.0–142.5)
Odontophore80.3 ± 5.9 (71.0–87.0)72 ± 3.4 (66.0–77.0)75 (74.0–76.0)68.5 (66.0–73.0)70.5 ± 4.7 (63.0–82.5)
Oral aperture to guide ring75.9 ± 3.7 (71.0–82.0)68.7 ± 2.7 (64.0–72.0)71.6 (68.0–74.0)61.5 (57.0–66.0)71.3 ± 3.3 (64.5–76.5)
Lip region width14.5 ± 0.7 (14.0–15.5)13.8 ± 0.5 (13.0–15.0)13.8 (13.5–14.0)12.9 ± 0.7 (12.0–14.0)
Body width at guide ring35 ± 2.1 (32.5–38.4)33.8 ± 1.4 (31.8–36.4)33.7 (32.8–34.6)
Anal body width40.1 ± 3.6 (35.4–45.6)36.8 ± 2.1 (34.1–41.9)40.0 (37.3–42.8)
Tail length33.1 ± 3.6 (27.0–38.0)30.1 ± 2.5 (25.0–34.0)33.8 (31.0–35.5)32.0 ± 2.8 (27.0–38.0)
Pharynx451.7 ± 36 (404.0–504.0)
Anterior end to vulva1726.5 ± 92.6 (1610–1903)
Hyaline tail7.9 ± 1.1 (7.0–10.0)
Max body diameter60.3 ± 5.4 (54.5–67.0)59.4 ± 5.0 (52.0–68.0)68.7 (65.5–72.8)
Presence/absence malesAbsenceAbsenceAbsenceAbsenceAbsence

Comparative morphometrics of females of Paralongidorus sali (Siddiqi et al_, 1963) from different localities_ All measurements are in micrometer and in the form: mean ± s_d_ (range)_

This study Siddiqi et al. (1963) Choi and Duan 1988
LocalityHangzhou, ChinaIndiaKorea
HostCastanopsis sclerophylla (Lindl.) SchottkyShorea robusta GaertnPinus densiflora L.
n30209
L3.09 ± 0.24 (2.65–3.49)2.58 (2.25–2.85)3.34 ± 0.21 (3.0–3.63)
a55.9 ± 4.4 (49.3–64.6)65 (60–71 )67.3 ± 3.4 (61.7–71.7)
b6.6 ± 0.5 (5.7–7.8)6.3 (5.2–7.4)8.0 ± 0.3 (7.6–8.6)
c128.7 ± 9.1 (111.9–142)117 (107–129)120.9 ± 6.8 (110.9–131)
c0.65 ± 0.05 (0.56–0.78)0.7 (0.6–0.8)
V48.6 ± 1.7 (46.2–54.3)51 (50–54)48.1 ± 1.0 (46.0–49.9)
Total stylet186.8 ± 4.4 (179.0–196.0)
Odontostyle117.4 ± 3.3 (112.0–124.5)102 (98.0–107.0)112.4 ± 2.5 (109.0–117.0)
Odontophore68.9 ± 1.9 (66.0–74.0)59 (52.0–62.0)66.5 ± 7.3 (54.0–84.0)
Oral aperture to guide ring39.2 ± 1.2 (37.0–41.0)31 (30.0–32.0)37.7 ± 1.5 (34.0–40.0)
Lip region width10.4 ± 0.5 (9.0–11.0)
Body width at guide ring23.4 ± 0.7 (22.0–25.0)
Anal body width36.7 ± 1.9 (33.5–41.0)
Tail length24 ± 1.7 (21.0–27.0)
Anterior end to vulva1497 ± 111 (1287–1663)
Pharynx470.7 ± 32 (413.0–529.0)
Body width at vulva53.8 ± 5.5 (48.0–67.0)
Hyaline tail8.5 ± 0.7 (7.0–10.0)
Max body diameter55.5 ± 5.9 (45.0–69.0)
Presence/absence malesAbsenceAbsenceAbsence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2018-016 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Published on: Jan 11, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Ruihang Cai, Munawar Maria, Nan Qu, Pablo Castillo, Jingwu Zheng, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.