Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Nematicidal Weeds, Solanum nigrum and Datura stramonium
 Cover

Nematicidal Weeds, Solanum nigrum and Datura stramonium

Open Access
|Oct 2018

Full Article

Weeds compete with crop plants and soil organisms for resourses through the production of allelochemicals like phenolic acids, terpenes, terpenoids, glycosides, alkaloids, and flavonoids (Whittaker and Feeny, 1971; Blum, 1996; Keating, 1999). A major phyto-nematode control research issue is the study of herbal preparations rich in allelochemicals with nematicidal activity, of no adverse effects to non-target organisms and easy biodegradability. The use of green manures as soil bioamendments may be a suitable nematode control tool for many crop systems, especially if the botanical species to be incorporated are readily available in situ, like weeds. Solanum nigrum Linn. and Datura stramonium Linn., commonly known as black nightshade and jimsonweed, are two Solanaceous, highly invasive and globally distributed weeds that exhibit a range of biological properties (Zhou et al., 2012; Abbasi et al., 2015; Sher et al., 2015).

Although S. nigrum can be infected by Meloidogyne incognita (Robab et al., 2012) it also exhibits nematicidal activity. Specifically, its dried ground seed powder incorporated in soil at the rate of 5 g kg−1 lessens root galling and increases host shoot length (Radwan et al., 2012). Moreover, the water extract of S. nigrum at a concentration of 10 mg ml−1 induces morphological changes in the body structure of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus goodeyi, greatly affects movement and causes mortality (Gouveia et al., 2014). Interestingly, root extracts of S. nigrum are traditionally used in the treatment of animal worms and abdominal pain (Jagtap et al., 2013).

Solanum nigrum is a major source of various chemical groups of nematicidal compounds like alkaloids (Jagtap et al., 2013; Sammani et al., 2013), glycoalkaloids (Li et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2013), saponins (Jagtap et al., 2013), phenols (Gharbi et al., 2017), fatty acids (Dhellot et al., 2006; Mohy-ud-din et al., 2010) and tannins (Jagtap et al., 2013). An alkaloid named drupacine was found to exhibit an EC50 value of 76.3 µg ml−1 on M. incognita second stage juveniles (J2) and to reduce egg hatch by 36% after immersion in 1.0 mg ml−1 (Wen et al., 2013). Similarly, 4-quinolone waltherione and waltherione A, have been reported to have larvicidal activity against M. incognita (EC50 values of 0.09 and 0.27 μg ml−1 at 48 h) and egg hatch inhibition activity (91.9 and 87.4% after 7 days of exposure to 1.25 μg ml−1) (Jang et al., 2015). Saponins like solanigroside A and solanigroside B (Zhou et al., 2007) as well as oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins exhibit LC50 values against M. incognita ranging from 70.1 to 94.7 μg ml−1 after 48 h (Li et al., 2013); while a saponin based commercial nematicide from Quillaja saponaria has been registered for nematode control in Europe (Giannakou, 2011). 4-methylphenol is of significant in vitro activity against M. javanica (Yang et al., 2015) while Zhang and co-workers have demonstrated that fatty acids like caproic, caprylic, capric, lauric, myristic, and palmitic cause significantly high mortality to M. incognita J2 (Zhang et al., 2012). Tannic acid has been proven nematicidal as well (Hewlett et al., 1997). We also, in our previous studies, have demonstrated that acetic and hexanoic acid, as components of Melia azedarach, are effective against root-knot nematodes in terms of J2 paralysis activity (Ntalli et al., 2010).

Similar to S. nigrum, D. stramonium is a host for root-knot nematodes and even increases populations of Meloidogyne species if not controlled effectively (Ntidi et al., 2012). Nonetheless, hot water and ethanol extracts of D. stramonium seeds tested at 25 to 100 mg ml−1 caused 75% to 100% mortality of M. incognita J2 (Chaudhary et al., 2013). Similarly, leaf and stem extracts of D. stramonium tested at 500 mg L−1 against J2 resulted in relatively high mortality rates of 68 and 70% after 72 h of exposure (Elbadri et al., 2008). When tested in pot experiments, dried ground leaves of D. stramonium mixed with soil at the rate of 1 to 10 g kg−1 soil significantly suppressed M. incognita populations and root galling as they decomposed, but high rates proved to be phytotoxic (Radwan et al., 2006). Pre-plant treatments with D. stramonium leaf extracts at 0.5% to 1% significantly reduced gall numbers (Mateeva and Ivanova, 2000). Furthermore, aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium inhibited egg hatch and killed M. incognita larvae (Rao et al., 1986).

Chemical composition studies on D. stramonium seeds revealed N-trans-feruloyl tryptamine, hyoscyamilactol, scopoletin, umckalin, daturaolone, daturadiol, N-trans-ferulicacyl-tyramine, cleomiscosin A, fraxetin, scopolamine, 1-acetyl-7-hydrox-beta-carbol-ine, 7-hydroxy-beta-carboline1-propionic acid (Li et al., 2012). Scopolamine is a muscarinic antagonist (Lee et al., 2000) and one of the most important alkaloids present in D. stramonium (Ma et al., 2015).

The scope of this study was to (i) evaluate the nematicidal activity of S. nigrum and D. stramonium in terms of (a) J2 paralysis, (b) egg hatch inhibition, and (c) inhibition of nematode development in host roots and (ii) to delineate the chemical composition of active extracts after derivatization by GC–MS.

Materials and Methods
Nematode rearing and collection

Populations of M. incognita and M. javanica both of Greek origin were reared on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Belladonna. Freshly hatched (24 h) J2 as well as eggs of different growth stages were extracted from egg masses according to Hussey and Barker (1973) from 60 day-old (d) infested roots, to be used for the bioassays. The egg masses were handpicked from the tomato roots under a stereoscope.

Chemicals

Methanol, chloroform, and hexane were of high-performance liquid chromatography grade. All chemical standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milano, Italy).

Plant material extraction procedure

Dry plant material, 5 g of S. nigrum (seeds) and D. stramonium (shoots), were extracted in 50 ml methanol for 30 min in a sonicator apparatus. After exhaustive evaporation of the solvent the yields in dry material were measured at 12.3 ± 0.07 and 12.6 ± 0.01% (w/w) for D. stramonium and S. nigrum, respectively. The extracts were used directly for bioassays with nematodes and chemical composition analysis without evaporation.

J2 paralysis bioassays

J2s were extracted as described previously after hatch in modified Baermann funnels. Hatched juveniles were discarded after the first 2 days. Thereafter, hatched J2 less than or equal to 2 days-old were used for the paralysis experiments. The D. stramonium and S. nigrum extracts were diluted in DMSO, brought to volume with water and tested for paralysis activity in Cellstar 96-well cell culture plates (Greiner Bio-One) at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) with nematodes’ suspension. The final concentration of DMSO in test wells did not exceed 1% (v/v). Distilled water served as a control together with the carrier control (DMSO). Each well contained 15 J2s and the test concentrations of both extracts ranged from 100 to 1,000 μg ml−1. Border wells with J2s immersed in distilled water alone served as controls for fumigant activity test (Ntalli et al., 2011). Multiwell plates were covered to avoid evaporation and were maintained in the dark at 20°C. Juveniles were ranked into two distinct categories, moving and paralysed, with the aid of an inverted microscope (Euromex, The Netherlands) at ×40 after 1d, 2d, and 3d. After evaluation, J2 were washed through a 20 μm sieve, to remove the test compounds, and were immersed in water alone to determine if motility was regained. Numbers of motile and paralysed J2s were assessed by pricking the juvenile body with a needle, and they were counted. Nematodes that did not move at this point were considered dead. J2 paralysis bioassays were performed three times, and every treatment was replicated six times.

Egg hatch inhibition in free eggs treated with the test compounds

The egg hatch inhibition tests were performed in microwell assays (Ntalli et al., 2016). Briefly, nematodes were pipetted into 24-well cell culture plates (Greiner Bio-One), with 0.5 mL treatment at double the test concentration and 0.5 mL nematode inoculum (20 eggs) in sterile distilled water per well. Datura stramonium and S. nigrum methanol extracts were dissolved in DMSO and then brought to volume with water to reach desired concentrations. The final concentration of DMSO in test solutions did not exceed 1% as this concentration did not harm nematodes. The bioassay treatments were: 0.0 μg ml−1 (water control), 0.0 μg ml−1 (carrier control), and 1, 10, 100, and 1,000 μg ml−1, extract in the carrier. Five wells were used per treatment, and the plates were covered by plastic adhesive sheets to prevent volatiles escaping to adjacent wells. Hatch quantification was done by directly counting undifferentiated eggs and J2 in each well at day 0 using an inverted microscope at ×40. Thereafter, assessments were performed after 2, 6, 10, and 14 days. Cumulative percent J2 release was calculated using the formula: ((J2Dx - J2D0)/total) × 100 where Dx = day after the start of the assay. Cumulative percent undifferentiated egg hatch was calculated using the formula: ((EggsD0 - EggsDx)/total) × 100 where Dx = day after the start of the assay.

Inhibition of nematode development

Procedures were according to Ntalli et al. (2010). Briefly artificially inoculated with M. incognita tomato plants were then treated with powders of S. nigrum seeds and D. stramonium shoots, in a dose response from to 0.1 to 100 mg g−1. After the completion of a biological cycle at 27oC, 60% RH at 16 h photoperiod, plants were uprooted and roots were stained with acid fuchsin (Byrd et al., 1983). The following variables were assessed: fresh root weight, fresh shoot weight, and total number of female nematodes and galls per gram of root at ×10 magnification under uniform illumination by transparent light. The experiment was performed twice, and the treatments were arranged in a completely randomised design with five replicates.

Sample extraction for GC–MS analysis

For small polar metabolite analysis, the following procedure was used. Powdered plant material (100 mg) was extracted with 2 mL solvent mix chloroform/methanol (2/1, v/v), and three replications were made. After dispersion, the whole mixture was agitated for 15 to 20 min in an orbital shaker at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged to recover the liquid phase. The supernatant was washed with 400 µL of 0.9% KCl solution in water and vortexed for 1 min. After centrifugation at 2,000 rpm, the water phase was evaporated to dryness under a nitrogen stream. Afterwards, the residue was suspended in 50 µL of methoxyamine hydrochloride (10 mg ml−1) in pyridine. After 17 h, 50 mL of N,O-bis (trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) were added and kept for 1 hr at room temperature before 600 µL of a solution of 2-dodecanone in hexane (20 mg L−1) were added and samples were GC/MS analyzed. Derivatized atropine, linoleic acid and monostearin were used for GC/MS calibration.

For the alkaloidal compounds analysis, extraction with chloroform was performed as follows. Powdered plant material (100 mg) was extracted with a mix of 5 mL of a 0.1 N sodium hydroxide in water and 5 mL of CHCl3. A solution of caffeine in methanol (1 mg ml−1) was added as internal standard (I.S.). After 5 min centrifugation, the chloroform phase was separated and evaporated to dryness under a nitrogen stream. The residue was suspended in 100 µL of BSTFA and kept for 1 h at 70°C for silylation. After a 10-fold dilution with hexane, samples were GC/MS analyzed.

GC–MS conditions

One microliter of derivatized plant extract was injected in splitless mode into a 6,850 gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer 5,973 Network (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a 30 m × 0.25 mm ID silica capillary column, which was chemically bonded with 0.25 μm DB-5MS stationary phase (J&W scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The injector temperature was kept at 200°C and the mobile phase flow was 1 mL min−1. The column temperature gradient was as follows: 50°C for 10 min, then increased from 50 to 300 at a rate of 10°C min−1 and finally held at 300°C for 4 min. The transfer line and the ion source temperatures were respectively 280°C and 180°C. Ions were generated at 70 eV with electron ionization and were recorded at 1.6 scan sec−1 over the mass range m/z 50 to 550. GC–MS data analysis was conducted by integrating each resolved chromatogram peak and normalizing the area for the corrected total area of the chromatogram. These peaks were examined for their mass spectra and identification of the peaks was attempted using the NIST 08 library after deconvolution with AMDIS.

Statistical analysis

Treatments of motility experiments were replicated six times, and each experiment was performed twice. The percentages of paralyzed J2 observed in the microwell assays after 1 h were corrected by eliminating the natural death/paralysis in the water control according to the Schneider Orelli’s formula: Corrected % = {(Mortality percent in treatment - Mortality percent in control)/(100 - Mortality percent in control)} × 100 and they were analysed (ANOVA) after being combined over time. Since the ANOVA indicated no significant treatment by time interaction, means were averaged over experiments. Corrected percentages of paralyzed J2 treated with the weed extracts were subjected to nonlinear regression analysis using the log–logistic equation proposed by Seefeldt et al.: Y = C + (D − C)/{1 + exp[b (log(x) − log(EC5O))]} where C = the lower limit, D = the upper limit, b = the slope at the EC50, and EC50 = the test solution concentration required for 50% death/paralysis of nematodes after normalizing with the control (natural death/paralysis). In the regression equation, the test concentration was the independent variable (x) and the paralyzed J2 (percentage increase over water control) was the dependent variable (y). The mean value of the six replicates per each test concentration and immersion period was used to calculate the EC50 value.

Egg hatch inhibition treatments were replicated five times, and each bioassay was performed twice. Because the ANOVA indicated no significant treatment by time interaction, means were averaged over experiments. In egg hatch inhibition bioassays, treatment means were compared using Tukey’s test at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.

Pot bioassays were organised in a complete randomized design with five replications and were performed twice. Since ANOVAs indicated no significant treatment by time interaction (between runs of experiment), means were averaged over experiments. The data from the pot bioassays were expressed as a percentage decrease in the number of females or galls per gram of root corrected according to the control, using the Abbott’s formula: corrected percent = 100 × {1 − [females number in treated plot/females number in control plot]}. Data were fit to the log-logistic model (Seefeldt et al., 1995) to estimate the concentration that caused a 50% decrease in females and galls per gram of root (EC50 value). In this regression equation, the test compounds (% w/w) were the independent variables (x) and the female nematodes, or galls, (as the percentage decrease over the water control) was the dependent variable (y). Because ANOVAs indicated no significant treatment by time interaction (between runs of experiments), means were averaged over experiments. Treatments means were compared using Tukey’s test at P ≤ 0.05.

Results
J2 paralysis bioassays

Paralysis activity of M. incognita was more affected by D. stramonium and S. nigrum extracts than M. javanica (Table 1). Clear time and dose response relationships were established for D. stramonium and the EC50/96h values were 427 μg ml−1 for both M. incognita and M. javanica (Table 1). Solanum nigrum demonstrated a nematostatic effect and the mortality was stabilized 3 days post J2 immersion in test solutions.

Table 1

Efficacy of Datura stramonium and Solanum nigrum methanol extracts against Meloidogyne incognita and Meloidogyne javanica.1

D. stramonium S. nigrum
Immersion period M. incognita M. javanica M. incognita M. javanica
1d968 ± 98>8,000409 ± 56686 ± 98
2d553 ± 85581 ± 73507 ± 72792 ± 95
3d427 ± 75427 ± 23418 ± 78954 ± 96

1Half maximal effective concentration EC50  ± SD (μg ml−1) calculated after 1, 2, and 3 days of nematode immersion in test solutions.

Egg hatch inhibition in free eggs treated with the test compounds

The cumulative undifferentiated egg hatch was decreased significantly by both D. stramonium and S. nigrum extracts at 100 μg mL−1 at day 6, while in successive assessments the activity increased for D. stramonium and decreased for S. nigrum (Tables 2, 3). Concerning the percent of J2 released from eggs immersed in the two methanol extracts, again D. stramonium was more active since it differed from control at 10 μg ml−1 at day 2 while S. nigrum differed from the control only at concentrations equal or higher than 100 μg ml−1 (day 2). In the next assessment date at day 6, activity increased for D. stramonium and decreased for S. nigrum differing from control at 1 and 100 μg ml−1, respectively. At day 10 the percent J2 release in control decreased naturally and thus J2 release differences among treatments were not evident thereafter (Tables 4, 5).

Table 2

Effect of Datura stramonium methanol extract on cumulative percent hatch of Meloidogyne incognita undifferentiated eggs.1

D. stramonium cumulative undifferentiated egg hatch
μg ml−1 Day 2Day 6Day 10Day 14
1,0009 ± 1.0a 9 ± 1.0a 9 ± 1.5a 9 ± 1.5a
10010 ± 5.0a 10 ± 5.0a 10 ± 5.0a 10 ± 5.0a
1017 ± 6.5a 23 ± 6.5ab 23 ± 6.5a 23 ± 6.5a
114 ± 6.0a 24 ± 4.5ab 23 ± 6.5a 23 ± 6.5a
013 ± 8.0a 35 ± 9.0b 47 ± 9.0b 47 ± 9.0b

1The cumulative percent hatch of undifferentiated eggs ± SD was calculated using the formula: ((eggsD0 - eggsDx)/total) × 100. Eggs (20–30 per well) were collected and distributed in 24-well plates and were incubated at 27°C for 14 days in test solutions or plane water. Eggs were counted at 2, 6, 10, and 14 days post experiment establishment. Each percent data represent the mean ± SD from two experiments performed in time, with five replicates per treatment each. Values within each day were compared using Tuckey’s test and those followed by different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).

Table 3

Effect of Solanum nigrum methanol extract on cumulative percent hatch of Meloidogyne incognita undifferentiated eggs.1

S. nigrum cumulative undifferentiated egg hatch
μg ml−1 Day 2Day 6Day 10Day 14
1,0009 ± 0.5a 8 ± 0.0a 9 ± 6.0a 9 ± 6.0a
10015 ± 2.0a 16 ± 4.0a 16 ± 4.0a 16 ± 4.0a
1015 ± 2.0a 22 ± 1.0ab 27 ± 1.5ab 27 ± 1.0ab
117 ± 2.0ab 24 ± 3.5ab 27 ± 5.0ab 27 ± 5.0ab
025 ± 4.0b 35 ± 9.0b 47 ± 9.0b 47 ± 9.0b

1The cumulative percent hatch of undifferentiated eggs ± SD was calculated using the formula: ((eggsD0 - eggsDx)/total) × 100. Eggs (20–30 per well) were collected and distributed in 24-well plates and were incubated at 27oC for 14 days in test solutions or plane water. Eggs were counted at 2, 6, 10, and 14 days post experiment establishment. Each percent data represent the mean ± SD from two experiments performed in time, with five replicates per treatment each. Values within each day were compared using Tuckey’s test and those followed by different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).

Table 4

Effect of Datura stramonium methanol extract on cumulative percent release of Meloidogyne incognita J2.1

D. stramonium percent J2 release
μg ml−1 Day 2Day 6Day 10Day 14
1,0003 ± 1.5a 1 ± 1.0a 1 ± 1.0a 1 ± 1.0a
1006 ± 4.0a 5 ± 3.5a 4 ± 3.0a 4 ± 3.0a
1020 ± 5.5ab 5 ± 5.0a 4 ±1.5a 4 ± 1.5a
131 ± 6.5bc 5 ± 4.0a 5 ± 3.5a 5 ± 3.5a
040 ± 5.5c 20 ± 5.5b 8 ± 4.5a 5 ± 3.5a

1The cumulative percent release of J2 ± SD was calculated using the formula: ((J2Dx - J2D0)/total) × 100. Eggs (20–30 per well) were collected and distributed in 24-well plates and were incubated at 27°C for 14 days in test solutions or plane water. Released J2 were counted at 2, 6, 10, and 14 days post experiment establishment. Each percent data represent the mean ± SD from two experiments performed in time, with five replicates per treatment each. Values within each day were compared using Tuckey’s test and those followed by different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).

Table 5

Effect of Solanum nigrum methanol extract on cumulative percent release of Meloidogyne incognita J2.1

S. nigrum percent J2 release
μg ml−1 Day 2Day 6Day 10Day 14
1,0002 ± 2.0a 2 ± 2.0a 2 ± 2.0a 2 ± 2.0a
10011 ± 6.0ab 5 ± 4.5ab 2 ± 1.5a 2 ± 1.5a
1023 ± 2.0bc 6 ± 2.0ab 2 ± 1.0a 2 ± 1.0a
133 ± 6.5c 10 ± 5.0ab 11 ± 6.5a 6 ± 3.5a
040 ± 5.5c 20 ± 5.5b 8 ± 4.5a ±3.5a

1The cumulative percent release of Meloidogyne incognita J2 ± SD was calculated using the formula: ((J2Dx - J2D0)/total) × 100. Eggs (20–30 per well) were collected and distributed in 24-well plates and were incubated at 27oC for 14 days in test solutions or plane water. Released J2 were counted at 2, 6, 10, and 14 days post experiment establishment. Each percent data represent the mean ± SD from two experiments performed in time, with five replicates per treatment each. Values within each day were compared using Tuckey’s test and those followed by different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).

Inhibition of nematode development

Meloidogyne incognita densities in tomato roots and gall formation were significantly supressed when D. stramonium and S. nigrum powders were incorporated in the nematode infested soil. Meloidogyne incognita development in artificially inoculated tomato plants treated with the weed powders was reduced with EC50 values for female per gram root counts calculated for S. nigrum and D. stramonium of 1.13 and 11.40 mg g−1, respectively. Galls/g root were similar (Table 6), with no phytotoxicity evident at the dose range of the treatments used for the bioassay.

Table 6

Efficacy of weed paste (decomposing tissues) on Meloidogyne incognita as calculated in pot experiments.

Females/g rootGalls/g root
EC50 (mg g−1)SE95% CIEC50(mg g−1)SE95% CI
Datura stramonium
11.400.929.48–13.3212.851.1910.39–15.33
Solanum nigrum
1.130.170.78–1.481.150.170.79–1.51

SE, Standard error; CI, Confidence interval.

GC–MS analysis

The low-molecular weight polar compounds extracted from both plants S. nigrum and D. stramonium were submitted to derivatization and were chemically analyzed using GC–MS. We were able to detect amino acids, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids and some compounds with non-elucidated structures termed unknowns, from U1 to U16 (Table 7). The metabolites with the highest concentrations present in both plants were fructose, sucrose and U1 with concentrations ranging from 20 to 90 mg L−1. Although sugars like glucose and galactose were abundant in D. stramonium aqueous extracts, they were not detectable in S. nigrum extracts. Likewise, S. nigrum was richer in palmitic acid and glycerol. On the other hand, the chloroform extracts of both plants showed high levels of alkaloids such as dehydrohyoscinamine, atropine, and scopolamine (Table 8). Fatty acids and monoglycerides were also present at high concentrations; for example, palmitic acid was present at 1,694 mg L−1 only in S. nigrum and monoheptadecanoate glycerol at 466 mg L−1 in D. stramonium. When the alkaloid rich extract was tested against J2, no paralysis was evidenced at the concentration range of 100 to 1,000 μg ml−1 (data not shown).

Table 7

Small polar metabolites extracted from Datura stramonium and Solanum nigrum.

Concentration (mg L−1)
n°RTa LRIb m/z Quantitative masseCmpd D. stramonium S. nigrum
118.3031,099147–233–133147Propanedioic acid (2TMS)ND48.52
219.4981,166147–205–299147Glycerol (3TMS)3.6143.36
319.9821,193147–247–129147U178.4589.87
420.3311,215147–189–292147Lactic acid (2TMS)28.2911.70
520.6991,240147–175–117147U21.681.13
621.2381,276138–168–227138U37.60ND
721.7231,309147–189–233147U46.472.22
822.4731,361147–233–245147Malic acid (2TMS)4.901.70
922.7061,377147–189–219147U534.8113.35
1022.7931,383217–205–147217Erythrose (1MEOX) (3TMS)ND2.81
1123.0061,398254–269–180254U6
1223.1611,410271–169–1471475-hydroxymethyl 2-Furoic acid (2TMS)14.15ND
1323.2061,413117–147–217117U7
1423.2431,416205–292–147147Threonic acid (4TMS)1.52ND
1523.6161,445147–334–245334U81.09ND
1624.631,525103–147–217217Xylitol (5TMS)1.321.13
1725.3391,583117–147–147117U9
1825.5181,598217–319–147217Altrose (5TMS)3.96ND
1925.71,614231–147–133231U10
2025.8721,629246–147–129147U11
2126.1261,651217–257–379217U12
2226.4621,679204–379–147204Lyxose (1MEOX) (4TMS)tt
2326.8781,716217–307–103217Arabinitol (5TMS)2.722.22
2426.8891,717345–255–147345U13
2527.081,735147–217–307217Fructose oxime (6TMS)99.4160.26
2627.3631,761205–319–147319Glucose oxime (6TMS)161.16ND
2727.5621,779319–205–160319Galactose oxime (6TMS)43.89ND
2827.721,794319–205–147319Glucitol tmsND18.40
2928.3131,85195–83–19595U14
3028.4271,862313–129–117313Palmitic acid (TMS)ND21.06
3129.1891,937217–305–318305Myo-inositol (6TMS)10.101.43
3229.6831,986319–205–72319U15
3330.642,087124–361–140124Atropine TMS6.041.23
3431.032,13098–217–330330Methyl-5,8-epoxyretinoate1.872.34
3531.332,16459–72–12659Oleamide11.28
3633.112,387371–147–203371Monopalmitin (2TMS)4.202.60
3733.732,436217–289–361217U16
3833.892,447361–217–147361Sucrose (8TMS)46.7420.16
3934.012,456217–230–147217Alpha.-DL-arabinofuranoside, methyl (3TMS)6,8658
4034.542,491399–217–147399Monostearin (2TMS)3.212.06

aRetention time; bLinear retention index;

ND, Not detected; TMS, trimethylsilyl; U, unknown.

Table 8

Chemical composition of chloroform extraction of Datura stramonium and Solanum nigrum.

Concentration (mg L−1)
n°RTa LRIb m/z Quantitative masseCmpd D. stramonium S. nigrum
115.3097777–147–174147U1
215.80993147–117–191147U2
317.091,047130–174–188130U3
417.921,083117–131–147117U4
518.551,113144–218–73144Valine TMS28.43ND
619.221,150192–191–1231924-methylesculetin62.86ND
719.971,192109–111–183183U5
823.111,406263–278–175263U6
925.771,620357–299–211299Phosphoric acid TMSND13.12
1026.471,681285–117–85285Myristic acid TMSND51.57
1128.321,85295–96–19595Acetic acid, 9-methyl-9-aza-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-en-2-yl ester19.97ND
1228.441,864313–117–1293136-oxo-3-methoxy-n-methyl-4,5,7,8-diepoxymorphine14.93ND
1328.51,869117–129–313313Palmitic acid TMS1,694.97
1428.541,873195–194–81195U7
1528.951,913263–294–81–6767Linoleic acid, methyl esterND7.82
1628.981,91794–124–271124Dehydrohyoscinamine
1729.471,966160–262–328328U8
1829.982,017315–337–183315Lauric acid propyl ester
1930.072,026337–315–262337Linoleic acid TMS169.483,268
2030.152,035328–262–160328U9
2130.292,050341–117–129341Stearic acid TMSND834.952
2230.682,091124–361–94124Atropine TMS77.957.00
2330.882,112328–329–160328U10
2431.632,197343–211–147343Myristic acid glycerine TMS17.73225.34
2531.682,202138–94–154–94138Scopolamine5.65ND
2631.722,208356–262–160356U116.3815.27
2732.432,286356–160–444356U12
2832.882,351218–129–3132182-monopalmitin TMS13.56544.79
2933.242,406371–239–203371Palmitin TMS
3033.872,446385–147–203385Heptadecanoic acid glycerine TMS466.72ND
3134.322,476341–218–1472182-monostearin TMS13.9514.71
3234.412,483397–129–1471291-monooleoylglycerol TMS
3334.482,487441–399–147441U13
3434.632,498399–147–203399Stearin TMSND496.04

aRetention time; bLinear retention index;

ND, not detected; TMS, trimethylsilyl; U, unknown.

Discussion

A number of weeds have been studied as alternatives to synthetic nematicides. For instance, water and ethanol leaf extracts of Euphorbia hirta, Phyllanthus amarus, Cassia obtusifolia, Sida acuta, and Andropogon gayanus have been found to provoke 100% mortality on M. incognita juveniles at 15% to 20% (w/v) (Olabiyi et al., 2008). Chaudhary and co-workers have reported on 75% to 100% mortality of juveniles of M. incognita after treatment with hot water and ethanol extracts of D. stramonium seed at 25 to 100 mg ml−1 (Chaudhary et al., 2013), while Elbadri and co-workers have reported high nematicidal activity levels for D. stramonium seed extracts on M. incognita J2 at 500 ppm (Elbadri et al., 2008). Herein we report on a higher Meloidogyne sp. paralysis activity exhibited by S. nigrum and D. stramonium methanol extracts, since the EC50/3d values were calculated at around 420 μg ml−1. Interestingly the chloroform extracts of D. stramonium and S. nigrum were not active against the phytonematodes, thus suggesting the absence of activity for the alkaloids fraction. As previously demonstrated for other nematicidal plant extracts (Ntalli et al., 2013) M. incognita was found more susceptible than M. javanica when exposed to D. stramonium and S. nigrum extracts. When the weed extracts were tested for egg hatch inhibition, D. stramonium was more effective than S. nigrum in suppressing both cumulating undifferentiated egg hatch and J2 release from eggs. Similarly, water extracts of Luffa cylindrica and Momordica charantia significantly inhibited the hatching of Meloidogyne spp. eggs (Ononuju and Nzenwa, 2011). To the best of our knowledge this is the first report on the paralysis activity and egg hatch inhibition activity of S. nigrum and D. stramonium methanol extracts against Meloidogyne spp.

Interestingly when the S. nigrum seeds paste was used to treat nematode infested soil the EC50 value for reducing females per gram of tomato roots was the lowest ever reported for similar treatments by our group, namely 1.13 mg g−1 (Ntalli et al., 2010; Caboni et al., 2012; Caboni et al., 2013; Aissani et al., 2015; Caboni et al., 2015). Also Radwan and co-workers have reported on S. nigrum powder activity on M. incognita but at higher concentration levels, namely 5 g kg−1 (Radwan et al., 2012). It seems S. nigrum paste incorporated in the nematode infested soil was more active than the extract and more effective than D. stramonium.

Our results, on the chemical composition of the weeds under study agreed with former broad chemical screening studies (Jimoh et al., 2010). Steenkamp et al. (2004) also detected atropine and scopolamine by high performance liquid chromatography in D. stramonium. Additionally, linoleic acid, present at 3,268 mg L−1 in S.nigrum was reported for its nematicidal activity on Caenorhabditis elegans with EC50 value as low as 5 mg L−1 (Stadler et al., 1993). This work reports for the first time, ten metabolites in D. stramonium and S. nigrum using GC–MS after methoxylation and sylilation.

It appears that the complexity of the biological interactions among chemical constituents adds to the overall efficacy of the material. We previously found that soil incorporation of powdered plant materials had lower EC50 values for nematicidal activity than the respective extracts (Ntalli et al., 2010, Aissani et al., 2015, Caboni et al., 2015). Farmers do in fact utilize complex materials like waste resources, oil seed cake, and gutter oil to help manage M. incognita (Zhang et al., 2012) and efficacy is the sum of activities of active(s) against various nematode growth stages (egg, J2, and female laying eggs). The efficacy of the botanical nematicidals along with their side effects on non-target organisms, easiness of preparation, and cost effectiveness contribute to their overall significancy (Ntalli and Caboni, 2017). Biofumigation has been advocated as an eco-friendly tactic to manage plant-parasitic nematodes amongst which the number-one target has been Meloidogyne sp. (Jones et al., 2013) and Brassicas is the oldest green manure amendment for their control globally (Fourie et al., 2016). Here we prove that the production/release of nematicidal allelochemicals by S. nigrum when its seeds are crashed and incorporated into the soil is among the best reported (EC50 = 1.13 mg of S. nigrum powder per gram of soil) by our group. Since both S. nigrum and D. stramonium are widespread weed species, their soil incorporation could be an interesting alternative nematode control tool.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2018-017 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 317 - 328
Published on: Oct 17, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Chrisostomos Oplos, Kodjo Eloh, Urania-Menkissoglu Spiroudi, Caboni Pierluigi, Nikoletta Ntalli, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.