Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The assessment of parameters of convalescent plasma and their impact on COVID-19 symptoms Cover

The assessment of parameters of convalescent plasma and their impact on COVID-19 symptoms

Open Access
|Apr 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrating the probability of survival at 28 days post-CP transfusion stratified by age groups (≥ 68 years vs. < 68 years). The log-rank test revealed a significant difference in survival rates (p < 0.001), with younger patients displaying a higher survival probability (97.5% vs. 70.2%)
Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrating the probability of survival at 28 days post-CP transfusion stratified by age groups (≥ 68 years vs. < 68 years). The log-rank test revealed a significant difference in survival rates (p < 0.001), with younger patients displaying a higher survival probability (97.5% vs. 70.2%)

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves among COVID-19 patients differ by the assessment of the laboratory test results: A) hematocrit level (p = 0.002), B) monocytes level (p = 0.017), and C) pCO2 (p = 0.042) and their associations with survival probability, supported by log-rank tests for statistical significance. V0: baseline (pre-CP transfusion), V1: 3 days post-transfusion, V2: 7 days post-transfusion, V3: 28 days post-transfusion
Kaplan-Meier curves among COVID-19 patients differ by the assessment of the laboratory test results: A) hematocrit level (p = 0.002), B) monocytes level (p = 0.017), and C) pCO2 (p = 0.042) and their associations with survival probability, supported by log-rank tests for statistical significance. V0: baseline (pre-CP transfusion), V1: 3 days post-transfusion, V2: 7 days post-transfusion, V3: 28 days post-transfusion

Figure 3.

The distribution of patients differed in leukocyte levels (A) across four visits (pre-CP and three post-CP follow-ups). A significant leukocyte increase is observed (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 145.1, p < 0.001). Panel B focuses on hemoglobin levels over the same period, showing progressive normalization (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 18.3, p = 0.006). Panels C and D present correlation analyses between leukocyte counts and time post-transfusion, with p-values of < 0.001 and 0.024, respectively. V0 – results directly before the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration
The distribution of patients differed in leukocyte levels (A) across four visits (pre-CP and three post-CP follow-ups). A significant leukocyte increase is observed (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 145.1, p < 0.001). Panel B focuses on hemoglobin levels over the same period, showing progressive normalization (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 18.3, p = 0.006). Panels C and D present correlation analyses between leukocyte counts and time post-transfusion, with p-values of < 0.001 and 0.024, respectively. V0 – results directly before the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration

Figure 4.

Patients’ structure differs in assessing the level of inflammation indicators on consecutive days. Panels A and B illustrate CRP levels, with significant declines from baseline to post-CP follow-ups (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 145.1, p < 0.001). Panels C and D depict procalcitonin trends, similarly showing reductions (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 88.9, p < 0.001). Subpanels include bar graphs with standard deviations and group comparisons via post-hoc tests. Post hoc tests confirmed significant differences between V0 and all subsequent time points for both indicators. V0 – results directly prior the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration
Patients’ structure differs in assessing the level of inflammation indicators on consecutive days. Panels A and B illustrate CRP levels, with significant declines from baseline to post-CP follow-ups (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 145.1, p < 0.001). Panels C and D depict procalcitonin trends, similarly showing reductions (Friedman ANOVA, χ2 = 88.9, p < 0.001). Subpanels include bar graphs with standard deviations and group comparisons via post-hoc tests. Post hoc tests confirmed significant differences between V0 and all subsequent time points for both indicators. V0 – results directly prior the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration

Figure 5.

The results of Friedman tests representing the level of antibodies against: A) IgA – anti - SARS-CoV-2, B) IgM – anti-SARS-CoV-2, and C) IgG – anti-SARS-CoV-2 in the following days of visits (Friedman ANOVA, p < 0.001 for all). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between baseline (V0) and 28 days post-CP transfusion (V3) for all antibody types. V0 – results directly prior the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration (Friedman ANOVA, p < 0.001 for all)
The results of Friedman tests representing the level of antibodies against: A) IgA – anti - SARS-CoV-2, B) IgM – anti-SARS-CoV-2, and C) IgG – anti-SARS-CoV-2 in the following days of visits (Friedman ANOVA, p < 0.001 for all). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between baseline (V0) and 28 days post-CP transfusion (V3) for all antibody types. V0 – results directly prior the CP administration; V1 – after three days; V2 – after seven days; V3 – after 28 days of CP administration (Friedman ANOVA, p < 0.001 for all)

Figure S1.

Duration of hospitalization among patients admitted due to COVID-19-associated dyspnea compared to those admitted for other reasons. The boxplot demonstrates a significantly longer duration of hospitalization for patients with dyspnea (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.047)
Duration of hospitalization among patients admitted due to COVID-19-associated dyspnea compared to those admitted for other reasons. The boxplot demonstrates a significantly longer duration of hospitalization for patients with dyspnea (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.047)

Figure S2.

The structure of number of patients differing in the assessment of the level of serological response in the consecutive days of the visits including A) hematocrit, B) lymphocytes, C) neutrophiles, D) eosinocytes, E) MCH (Mean corpuscular hemoglobin), F) platelets, G) monocytes levels. V0- first visit prior CP administration, V1 – subsequent visit after 3 days, V2 – subsequent visit after 7 days, V3 – subsequent visit after 28 days of CP administration
The structure of number of patients differing in the assessment of the level of serological response in the consecutive days of the visits including A) hematocrit, B) lymphocytes, C) neutrophiles, D) eosinocytes, E) MCH (Mean corpuscular hemoglobin), F) platelets, G) monocytes levels. V0- first visit prior CP administration, V1 – subsequent visit after 3 days, V2 – subsequent visit after 7 days, V3 – subsequent visit after 28 days of CP administration

The number (percentage) of plasma recipients differed in categories depending on the results of biochemical, serological parameters in the subsequent visit days (V0 - before CP administration, V1 - after 3 days, V2 – 7 days, V3 – after 28 days of CP administration)

V0 BeforeV1 After 3 daysV2 After 7 daysV3 After 28 daysChi-squared test
Leukocytes countN = 108N = 102N= 101N = 101
Below standard14 (13.0%)4 (3.9%)3 (3.0%)1 (1.0%)χ2 = 38.2
Standard81 (75.0%)83 (81.4%)82 (81.2%)64 (63.4%)df = 6
Above standard13 (12.0%)15 (14.7%)16 (15.8%)36 (35.6%)p < 0.001
HemoglobinN = 108N = 111N = 101N = 101
Below standard39 (36.1%)50 (49.0%)36 (35.6%)23 (22.8%)χ2 = 18.3
Standard69 (63.9%)52 (51.0%)64 (63.4%)78 (77.2%)df = 6
Above standard0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)p = 0.006
HematocritN = 108N = 102N = 101N = 101
Below standard27 (25.0%)37 (36.3%)25 (24.8%)14 (13.9%)χ2 = 17.0
Standard79 (73.1%)65 (63.7%)76 (75.2%)85 (84.2%)df = 6
Above standard2 (1.9%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)2 (2.0%)p = 0.009
MCVN = 108N = 102N = 101N = 101
Below standard3 (2.8%)2 (2.0%)2 (2.0%)1 (1.0%)χ2 = 1.61
Standard98 (90.7%)91 (89.2%)93 (92.1%)93 (92.1%)df = 6
Above standard7 (6.5%)9 (8.8%)6 (5.9%)7 (6.9%)p = 0.952
MCHN = 108N = 102N = 101N = 101
Below standard3 (2.8%)2 (2.0%)2 (2.0%)1 (1.0%)χ2 = 18.6
Standard104 (96.3%)100 (98.0%)99 (98.0%)93 (92.1%)df = 6
Above standard1 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)7 (6.9%)p = 0.005
PlateletsN = 108N = 102N = 101N = 101
Below standard16 (14.8%)6 (5.9%)1 (1.0%)1 (1.0%)χ2 = 69.8
Standard88 (81.5%)88 (86.3%)80 (79.2%)62 (61.4%)df = 6
Above standard4 (3.7%)8 (7.8%)20 (19.8%)38 (37.6%)p < 0.001
NeutrophilesN = 108N = 101N = 100N = 101
Below standard12 (11.1%)7 (6.9%)5 (5.0%)2 (2.0%)χ2 = 13.8
Standard49 (45.4%)57 (56.4%)64 (64.0%)54 (53.5%)df = 6
Above standard47 (43.5%)37 (36.6%)31 (31.0%)45 (44.6%)p = 0.032
LimphocytesN = 108N = 101N = 100N = 101
Below standard85 (78.7%)71 (70.3%)59 (59.0%)31 (30.7%)χ2 = 57.4
Standard20 (18.5%)28 (27.7%)39 (39.0%)65 (64.4%)df = 6
Above standard3 (2.8%)2 (2.0%)2 (2.0%)5 (5.0%)p < 0.001
MonocytesN = 108N = 101N = 100N = 101
Below standard11 (10.2%)9 (8.9%)4 (4.0%)3 (3.0%)χ2 = 18.9
Standard90 (83.3%)84 (83.2%)84 (84.0%)76 (75.2%)df = 6
Above standard7 (6.5%)8 (7.9%)12 (12.0%)22 (21.8%)p = 0.004
EosynocytesN = 108N = 101N = 100N = 101χ2 = 26.2
Below standard42 (38.9%)28 (27.7%)22 (22.0%)9 (8.9%)df = 3
Standard66 (61.1%)73 (72.3%)78 (78.0%)92 (91.1%)p < 0.001
BasocytesN = 108N = 101N = 100N = 101χ2 = 8.07
Below standard4 (3.7%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)df = 3
Standard104 (96.3%)101 (100.0%)99 (99.0%)101 (100.0%)p = 0.045
CRPN = 109N = 101N = 104N = 100
Below standard0 (0,0%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,0%)0 (0,0%)χ2 = 71,4
Standard4 (3,7%)7 (6,3%)17 (16,3%)43 (43,0%)df = 6
Above standard105 (96,3&)94 (84,7%)86 (82,7%)57 (57,0%)p < 0,001
ProkalcytoninyN = 104N = 97N = 100N = 97χ2 = 39,2
Standard49 (47,1%)49 (50,5%)67 (67,0%)83 (85,6%)df = 3
Above standard55 (52,9%)48 (49,5%)33 (33,0%)14 (14,4%)p < 0,001
FerrytynaN = 102N = 96N = 97N = 96
Below standard0 (0,0%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,0%)0 (0,0%)χ2 = 9,78
Standard12 (11,8%)5 (5,2%)6 (6,2%)14 (14,6%)df = 6
Above standard90 (88,2%)91 (94,8%)90 (92,8%)82 (85,4%)p = 0,134
D-dimerN = 106N = 101N = 97N = 95χ2 = 6,56
Standard38 (35,8%)23 (22,8%)21 (21,6%)27 (28,4%)df = 3
Above standard68 (54,2%)78 (77,2%)76 (78,4%)68 (71,6%)p = 0,087
LDHN = 106N = 98N = 99N = 97
Below standard1 (0,9%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,0%)1 (1,0%)χ2 = 23,2
Standard16 (15,1%)13 (13,3%)23 (23,2%)37 (38,2%)df = 6
Above standard89 (84,0%)85 (86,7%)75 (75,8%)59 (60,8%)p < 0,001
pHN = 104N = 84N = 89N = 86
Below standard3 (2,9%)1 (1,2%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,2%)χ2 = 7,24
Standard32 (30,8%)37 (44,0%)29 (32,6%)28 (32,5%)df = 6
Above standard69 (66,3%)46 (54,8%)60 (67,4%)57 (66,3%)p = 0,299
PO2N = 104N = 84N = 89N = 85
Below standard64 (61,5%)56 (66,7%)63 (70,8%)55 (64,7%)χ2 = 7,25
Standard34 (32,7%)17 (20,2%)19 (21,3%)22 (25,9%)df = 6
Above standard6 (5,8%)11 (13,1%)7 (7,9%)8 (9,4%)p = 0,298
PCO2N = 104N = 84N = 89N = 86
Below standard38 (36,5%)17 (20,2%)20 (22,5%)20 (23,2%)χ2 = 9,69
Standard63 (60,6%)66 (78,6%)67 (75,3%)63 (73,3%)df = 6
Above standard3 (2,9%)1 (1,2%)2 (2,2%)3 (3,5%)p = 0,138
HCO3N = 104N = 84N = 89N = 86
Below standard7 (6,7%)1 (1,2%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,2%)χ2 = 18,8
Standard91 (87,5%)75 (89,3%)79 (88,8%)69 (80,2%)df = 6
Above standard6 (5,8%)8 (9,5%)10 (11,2%)16 (18,6%)p = 0,005
BEN = 102N = 84N = 89N = 86
Below standard6 (5,9%)1 (1,2%)0 (0,0%)0 (0,0%)χ2 = 17,8
Standard70 (68,6%)49 (58,3%)52 (58,4%)58 (67,4%)df = 6
Above standard26 (25,5%)34 (40,5%)37 (41,6%)28 (32,6%)p = 0,007
O2N = 104N = 84N = 88N = 85
Below standard76 (73,1%)70 (83,3%)73 (83,0%)62 (72,9%)χ2 = 6,47
Standard27 (26,0%)14 (16,7%)15 (17,0%)22 (25,9%)df = 6
Above standard1 (1,0%)0 (0,0%)0 (0,0%)1 (1,2%)p = 0,372

Number (percentage) of plasma recipients differing by the categories depending on the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies levels during a subsequent visits (V0 - test before CP administration, V2 - after 7 days, V3 - after 28 days of CP administration)

V0 BeforeV2 After 7 daysV3 After 28 daysChi-square test
IgA anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 97N = 96
Negative34 (30.9%)5 (5.2%)0 (0.0%)χ2 = 52.8
Inconsistent3 (2.7%)2 (2.0%)1 (1.0%)df = 4
Positive73 (66.4%)90 (92.8%)95 (99.0%)p < 0.001a
IgA anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 97N = 96χ2 = 73.3
Me [Q1; Q3]2.3 [1; 8]18.1 [5; 22]19.4 [10–21]df = 2
Min – Max0 – 251 – 241 – 25p < 0.001b
IgM anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 98N = 96χ2 = 32.5
Negative52 (47.3%)19 (19.4%)14 (14.6%)df = 2
Positive58 (52.7%)79 (80.6%)82 (85.4%)p < 0.001a
IgM anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 97N = 96χ2 = 83.3
Me [Q1; Q3]1.1 [0; 7]10.2 [2; 27]10.3 [3; 26]df = 2
Min – Max0 – 300 – 300 – 30p < 0.001b
IgG anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 98N = 96χ2 = 53.5
Negative38 (34.2%)6 (6.1%)1 (1.0%)df = 2
Positive73 (65.8%)92 (93.9%)95 (99.0%)p < 0.001a
IgG anty-SARS-CoV-2N = 108N = 97N = 96χ2 = 125.8
Me [Q1; Q3]4.5 [0.3; 16]22.7 [10; 31]31.2 [24; 37]df = 2
Min – Max0 – 54.10 – 48.32.9 – 51.2p < 0.001b

The results of the ROC curves analysis of variables for the assessment of the likelihood of death caused by COVID-19 infection

Variable (parameter)Cut-off valueSensitivitySpecificityAUC (95% CI)p value
Duration from the first COVID-19 symptom to CP administration (days)<90.5100.5000.598 (0.388–0.807)p = 0.797
Plasma titers<20000.6250.4000.536 (0.342–0.730)p = 0.670
Age (years old)≥680.7500.8400.842 (0.706–0.978)p < 0.001
BMI (kg/m2)≥300.5000.7600.577 (0.372–0.781)p = 0.136

Analysis of hospitalization duration across various patient subgroups stratified by key clinical and demographic parameters, including time between symptom onset and CP administration, donor plasma titer levels, age, BMI, and presence of dyspnea at hospital admission

Patients subgroupsMe (Q1 – Q3)Min – Maxp
Time between symptoms and CP administration <9 days11 (9 – 14)2 – 670.057
Time between symptoms and CP administration □9 days10 (8 – 12)3 – 31
Donor plasma titer = 200010 (8 – 14)2 – 670.907
Donor plasma titer < 200010 (8 – 13)3 – 52
Age < 68 years old10 (8 – 13)2 – 520.510
Age □ 68 years old12 (8 – 16)2 – 67
BMI □ 30 kg/m210 (8 – 14)2 – 670.684
BMI > 30 kg/m210 (9 – 13)2 – 27
Hospitalization time (days): Dyspnea during the admission to the hospital10 (9 – 14)2 – 670.047
Lack of dyspnea9 (6 – 10)4 – 18

Post-hoc pairwise comparisons of overall survival probability based on hematocrit, monocyte, and pCO2 levels after CP transfusion

SubgroupsHematocritMonocytespCO2
Normal vs Below standardp = 0.257p = 0.006p = 0.653
Normal vs Above standardp < 0.001p = 0.283p = 0.039
Below vs Above standardp = 0.019p = 0.512p = 0.021
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 49
Submitted on: Jul 29, 2024
|
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2025
|
Published on: Apr 17, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Agnieszka Kuś, Szymon Wieczorek, Jarosław Dybko, Małgorzata Szymczyk-Nużka, Aleksandra Butrym, Krzysztof Dudek, Grzegorz Mazur, Siddarth Agrawal, published by Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.