Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unraveling the Complexity and Advancements of Transdifferentiation Technologies in the Biomedical Field and Their Potential Clinical Relevance Cover

Unraveling the Complexity and Advancements of Transdifferentiation Technologies in the Biomedical Field and Their Potential Clinical Relevance

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig 1.

Illustration of the processes of Td, differentiation, and reprogramming. The respective details could be found in the text below. Td, transdifferentiation.
Illustration of the processes of Td, differentiation, and reprogramming. The respective details could be found in the text below. Td, transdifferentiation.

Fig 2.

Transdifferentiation of two different cells, astrocytes and fibroblasts cell, into neurons using two different methods. Astrocytes are transdifferentiated into neurons using different TFs (Ascl1, Myt1l, Brn2a, and Neuro D1), while fibroblasts transdifferentiated into neurons using small molecules (ISX9 and VPA). ASCL1: Achaete-scute homolog 1; ISX9, A neurogenesis-promoting small molecule; TFs, transcription factors; VPA, Valproic acid.
Transdifferentiation of two different cells, astrocytes and fibroblasts cell, into neurons using two different methods. Astrocytes are transdifferentiated into neurons using different TFs (Ascl1, Myt1l, Brn2a, and Neuro D1), while fibroblasts transdifferentiated into neurons using small molecules (ISX9 and VPA). ASCL1: Achaete-scute homolog 1; ISX9, A neurogenesis-promoting small molecule; TFs, transcription factors; VPA, Valproic acid.

Fig 3.

Different intermediate states during the transdifferentiation. MX, UI, and PG denote the mix, unspecific, and progenitor intermediate states, respectively.
Different intermediate states during the transdifferentiation. MX, UI, and PG denote the mix, unspecific, and progenitor intermediate states, respectively.

Fig 4.

Summary of different applications of transdifferentiation in tissue engineering, cellular therapy, disease modeling, and gene correction. Df, differentiation; iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cells; Td, transdifferentiation.
Summary of different applications of transdifferentiation in tissue engineering, cellular therapy, disease modeling, and gene correction. Df, differentiation; iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cells; Td, transdifferentiation.

Features and pitfalls of different strategies of transdifferentiation

StrategyAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
TFs
  • High efficacy rate

  • Well studied technique

  • Direct specific reprogramming of donor cells

  • Risk of tumorigenicity due to insertion mutagenesis

  • Requires genetic manipulation

  • Limited knowledge of cell type and TF combination

Zhang et al. 2023b
MicroRNA
  • Non genetic strategy

  • Specific gene expression

  • Lower efficiency

  • Difficult to study the cross talks between microRNA and genes

  • Potential risk of tumorigenicity

Shen et al., 2023; Singh et al., 2020
Small molecules or pharmacological agents
  • Broad range of alternatives

  • Non-genetic approach

  • Lower chance of tumor formation

  • Cost-effective

  • Extensive optimization and specific molecule identification are necessary

  • Toxicological effects need to be determined

Jayawardena et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2023b
Extracellular vehicles and 3D culture
  • Mimics developmental process and architectural arrangement

  • Signal transducing agents and growth factors are used

  • Variability in differentiated cell population and phenotype

  • Difficult to maintain 3D structure during cell culture

Zhang et al. 2023b

Examples of transdifferentiation of different cell types using various approaches

Source cellTarget cellTF or transdifferentiation factor usedObservationReferences
Adipocyte-derived stem cellsOsteoblastsStreptomycin, penicillin, amphotericin B, and amphotericin B with Cu2+Exposure of amphotericin B induced the osteogenesis of stem cellsSkubis et al. 2017
AstrocyteiNAscl1, Myt1l, Brn2aEfficacy 0.4%–5.9%Torper et al. 2013
Astrocyte NG2 celliNNeuroD1
  • Transdifferentiated iN observed in tissue

  • Efficacy 90%

Guo et al. 2014
Cardiac fibroblastCardiomyocytesGata4, Mef2c, Tbx5
  • Decreased infarct dimension

  • Cardiac tissue dysfunction reduced

  • Efficacy 10%–15%

Qian et al. 2012
Cardiac fibroblastCardiomyocytesGata4, Mef2c, Tbx5
  • Cardiomyocyte cells observed in fibrotic area

  • Efficacy 3%–7%

Inagawa et al. 2012
Cardiac fibroblastCardiomyocytesmicroRNAs 1, 133, 208, and 499
  • Transdifferentiated cells were observed in the infarct spot

  • Efficacy 12%–25%

Jayawardena et al. 2015
FibroblastsNeuronsVPANeurons generated by histone deacetylase inhibitor mechanism Glutamatergic neurons generatedHu et al. 2015a
FibroblastsNeuronsISX9Inhibition of the BET family protein induces the transdifferentiation processLi et al. 2015
FibroblastsCardiomyocytesLIFTransdifferentiation occurs through an intermediate stateFu et al. 2015
FibroblastsHepatocytesHGFHuman hepatic progenitors proliferate for at least 10 passages without losing differentiation potential in vitroKim et al. 2019
FibroblastCorneal epithelialTCF4, C/EBPδ, ∆Np63α and Corneal specific mediumInfection with TCF4, C/EBPδ, and ∆Np63α TFs and exposure of medium induce transdifferentiationCieślar-Pobuda et al. 2016

List of selected clinical trials involving iPSCs or iPSC reprogramming for treatment of various diseases

NCT numberTitle of studyDiseaseLocation of study
NCT04476225iPSCs for disease researchHirschsprung diseaseSan Francisco, California, USA
NCT03883750iPSCs for Niemann–Pick diseaseNiemann–Pick diseaseLahore, Pakistan
NCT02720939ASD-specific iPSCs for disease modelingAutism spectrum disorderTaipei, Taiwan
NCT02084407Induction of pluripotent stem cells from human fibroblasts of DM1 patientsMyotonic dystrophyParis, France
NCT05616338Modeling bronchial epithelium in severe asthma with human induced iPSCSevere asthmaMontpellier, France
NCT01943383Pharmacogenomic evaluation of antihypertensive responses in iPSCs studyHypertensionGainesville, Florida, USA
NCT02193724Feasibility of generating pluripotent stem cells from patients with familial retinoblastomaRetinoblastomaMemphis, Tennessee, USA
NCT03872713Establishment of human cellular disease models for Morquio diseaseMorquio diseaseLahore, Pakistan
NCT03867526Establishment of human cellular disease models for Wilson diseaseWilson diseaseLahore, Pakistan
NCT03696628Modeling and pharmacological targeting of genetic cardiomyopathy in children via cardiomyocytes derived from iPSCsCardiomyopathy, familialMontpellier, Occitanie, France
NCT01808729CAUSE Trial: Patient specific-cellular characterization of fibromuscular dysplasia and high-risk atherosclerotic endotheliumEarly onset CAD fibromuscular dysplasiaNew York, New York, USA
NCT02162953Stem cell models of best disease and other retinal degenerative diseasesAdult onset vitelliform, macular dystrophy, autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy, best vitelliform macular dystrophy, bestrophinopathy, retinal diseaseRochester, Minnesota, USA
NCT00953693Patient specific iPSCsEye disorders Hepatic disordersTehran, Iran,
NCT02464956Production of iPSC-derived (RPE) cells for transplantation in AMDAMDLocation not provided
NCT03754088In vitro model of the cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelium via iPS technologyCystic fibrosis
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 11, 2024
|
Accepted on: Nov 4, 2024
|
Published on: Dec 5, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Purusottam Mishra, Izabella Biesiada, Payal Gupta, Saeid Ghavami, Jarosław Markowski, Marek J. Łos, published by Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.