Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Premature Delivery Under 32 Weeks of Gestation – Case Control Retrospective Study Cover

Premature Delivery Under 32 Weeks of Gestation – Case Control Retrospective Study

Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. 1. Bos LT, Tijms J. The incidence of prematurity or low birth weight for gestational age among children with dyslexia. Acta Paediatrica. 2012;101(11):e526-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02806.x.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02806.x22882207
  2. 2. Fernandes M, Silva Melo M, dos Santos AG, Santiago AKC. Prognosis of newborns in neonatal intensive care units: An integrative review. Revista De Pesquisa, Cuidado é Fundamental Online. 2019;11(3):748-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.9789/2175-5361.2019.v11i3.748-755.10.9789/2175-5361.2019.v11i3.748-755
  3. 3. Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Routine ultrasound at 32 0RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09rT2vs1RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09r T2 36 weeks’ gestation: Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;53(6):761-768. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1002/uog.20258.10.1002/uog.20258
  4. 4. Dunbar J, Sheeder J, Lezotte D, Dabelea D, Stevens-Simon C. Age at menarche and first pregnancy among psychosocially at-risk adolescents. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(10):1822-4.10.2105/AJPH.2007.120444263647918703451
  5. 5. Lean SC, Heazell AL, Mills TA, Boscolo-Ryan J, Peacock, L, Jones RL. PP.08 Manchester advanced maternal age study (MAMAS) - does an ageing maternal environment and altered placental function explain higher risk of poor pregnancy out come in advanced maternal age? Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2013;98 doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.289.10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.289
  6. 6. Nouri K, Ott J, Stoegbauer L, Pietrowski D, Frantal S, Walch K. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center - a pilot study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2013;11:84. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1186/1477-7827-11-84.10.1186/1477-7827-11-84384441624004836
  7. 7. Suzuki S, Miyake H. Perinatal outcomes of elderly primiparous dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization compared with those conceived spontaneously. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010;281(1):87-90. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1007/s00404-009-1083-3.10.1007/s00404-009-1083-319381666
  8. 8. Dadhwal V, Sharma AK, Deka D, Chawla L, Agarwal N. Selective fetal reduction in monochorionic twins: Preliminary experience. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association. 2019;20(2):79-83. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0052.10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0052655835330299263
  9. 9. Yıldırım E. Spontaneous triplet pregnancy and trap sequence, case report. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19.doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1186/s12884-019-2484-3.10.1186/s12884-019-2484-3672898531488101
  10. 10. Saugstad OD, Kwinta P, Wollen EJ, Bik-Multanowski M, Madetko-Talowska A, Jaga M, Pietrzyk JJ. Impact of antenatal glucocorticosteroids on whole-genome expression in preterm babies. Acta Paediatrica. 2013;102(4):349-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12166.10.1111/apa.1216623347050
  11. 11. Regaieg I, Amel BH, Charfi M, Regaieg C, Bouraoui A, Hmida N, Gargouri A. P635 Impact of antenatal corticosteroid therapy on the neonatal prognosis of preterm infants born before 33 weeks of amenorrhea. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;104 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-epa.966.10.1136/archdischild-2019-epa.966
  12. 12. Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, Ferre C, Devine O, Cohen B, Macaluso M. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: A population-based study[sup]. Human Reproduction. 2008;23(8):1941-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den169.10.1093/humrep/den169
  13. 13. Luke B, Stern JE, Hornstein MD, Kotelchuck M, Diop H, Cabral H, Declercq ER. Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2016;33(1):3-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0610-3.10.1007/s10815-015-0610-3
  14. 14. Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. The Lancet. 2002;360(9344):1489-1497. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11476-0.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11476-0
  15. 15. Carreno CA, Chauhan SP. Caesarean section is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm breech singleton infants: FOR: Caesarean delivery of extremely preterm breech singletons: An international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Bjog. 2018;125(6):665. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15037.10.1111/1471-0528.1503729700998
  16. 16. Caughey AB. Elective cesarean delivery: When is it justified? Journal of Perinatology. 2006;26(1):1-2. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211421.10.1038/sj.jp.721142116355102
  17. 17. Ebner F, Friedl TWP, Leinert E, Schramm A, Reister F, Lato K, DeGregorio N. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: A single centre experience. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;293(4):749-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z.10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z26437955
  18. 18. Benjamin B, Ishaque U, Chrusciel J, Bonneau S, Gabriel, R, Graesslin O. Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the cesarean section rate: Experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2021;303(2):443-454. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05765-2.10.1007/s00404-020-05765-232895742
  19. 19. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, Sinéad M O’Neill, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: Evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056583.10.1371/journal.pone.0056583357784923437176
  20. 20. Epstein FH, Parry S, Jerome FMD. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(10):663-670. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/premature-rupture-fetal-membranes/docview/223949696/se-2?accountid=136549.10.1056/NEJM1998030533810069486996
  21. 21. Tajik P, Ham DP, Zafarmand MH, Hof M, Morris J, Franssen M, Mol B. Using vaginal group B Streptococcus colonisation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes to guide the decision for immediate delivery: A secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials: An international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Bjog. 2004;121(10):1263-1272. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12889.10.1111/1471-0528.1288924862166
  22. 22. Suzuki Y, Horie K, Yada Y, Kono Y, Hirashima C, Usui, R, Ohkuchi A. Vaginal ureaplasma species increase chorioamnionitis in very preterm infants with preterm premature rupture of the membranes at < 28 weeks of gestation. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2018;37(12):2371-2380. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3385-5.10.1007/s10096-018-3385-530244363
  23. 23. Soliman SR, Burrows RF. Cesarean section: Analysis of the experience before and after the national consensus conference on aspects of cesarean birth: CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association. Journal. 1993;148(8):1315-20. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/cesarean-section-analysis-experience-before-after/docview/204963950/se-2?accountid=136549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amtsb-2021-0076 | Journal eISSN: 2285-7079 | Journal ISSN: 2285-7079
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 65
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2021
|
Accepted on: Dec 2, 2021
|
Published on: Jan 24, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Radu Chicea, Ioana Codruța Lebădă, Maria Livia Ognean, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.