Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Variation in Growth Performance and Carcass Yield of Pure and Reciprocal Crossbred Turkeys Cover

Variation in Growth Performance and Carcass Yield of Pure and Reciprocal Crossbred Turkeys

Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. American Poultry Association (2001). The American Standard of Perfection. APA, Troy, NY.
  2. AO AC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AO AC International. 16th Edition. Association of Ana- lytical Chemistry, Arlington, VA, USA.
  3. Berri C., Le Bihan-Duval E., Baeza E., Chartrin P., Picgirard L.,Jehl N., Quen- tin M., Piccard M., Duc los J. (2005). Further processing characteristics of breast and leg meat from fast-medium- and slow-growing commercial chickens. Anim. Res.. 54: 123-134.
  4. British United Turkeys (2013). B.U.T. 6 Commercial performance objectives, http :/Avww.a viagentur- keys.com/media/207198/vl_but_6_commercialgoals_uk.pdf.
  5. Burke W.H.. Henry M.H. (1997). Characteristics of the Pectoralis supeificialis and Semimem- branosus of broiler strain chickens, bantam chickens, and the reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei., 76: 767-773.
  6. Cheema M.A.. Qureshi M.A., Havenstein G.B., Ferket PR., Nestor K.E. (2007). A comparison of the immune response of 2003 commercial turkeys and a 1966 randombred strain when fed representative 2003 and 1966 turkey diets. Poultry Sei., 86: 241-248.
  7. Damaziak K., Michalczuk M., K u r e k A. (2012). Comparison of production performance of two genetic groups of turkeys reared in the semi-intensive system. JCEA, 13: 403^15.
  8. Damaziak K., Pietrzak P., Michalczuk M., Mroczek J., Niemiec J. (2013). Effect of genotype and sex on selected quality attributes of turkey meat. Arch. Geflügelk., 77: 206-214.
  9. Dickerson G.E. (1969). Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 37: 191-202.
  10. Fanatico A.C., Cavill L.C., Pi 11 ai P.B., Emmert J.L., Owens C.M. (2005). Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poultry Sei., 84: 1785-1790.
  11. Fanatico A.C.. Pillai P.B., Hester P.Y., Falcone C., Mech J.A., Owens C.M., Em- me r t J.L. (2008). Performance, livability, and carcass yield of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Sei., 87: 1012-1021.
  12. Havenstain G.B., Ferket PR., Grimes J.L.. Qureshi M.A., Nestor K.E. (2007). Com- parison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, livability; and feed conversion. Poultry Sei., 86: 232-240.
  13. Julian R.J. (2005). Production and growth related disorders and other metabolic diseases of poultry - A review. Vet. J., 169: 350-369.
  14. Kamara D., Gyenai K.B., Geng T, Hammade H . Smith E.J. (2007). Microsatellite mark- er-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage turkeys (Meleagridis gal- lopavo). Poultry Sei., 86: 46-49.
  15. Kirby Y.K., Anthony N.B., Hughes J.D., Mcnew R.W., Kibry J.D., Wide man R.F. (1999). Electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation of giant jungle fowl, broilers and their recipro- cal crosses following unilateral bronchus occlusion. Poultry Sei., 78: 125-134.
  16. Laird A.K.. Tyler S.A.. Burton A.D. (1965). Dynamic of normal growth. Growth. 29: 233-248.
  17. Larzul C., I in b e r t B., Bernadet M.D.. Guy G., R e in i g n o n H. (2006). Meat quality in an intergeneric factorial crossbreeding between muscovy (Cairina moschata) and Pekin (Anas platy- rhynchos) ducks. INRA. Anim. Res.. 55: 219-229.
  18. Lilbrn M.S.. Antonelli A. (2012). The effects of genotype on embryonic development in eggs from divergent turkey genotypes. Poultry Sei.. 91: 823-828.
  19. Mignon-Grasteau S.. Beaumont C. (2000). Growth curves in birds (in France). INRA Prod.Anim.. 13: 337-348.
  20. Mikulski D.. Celej J.. Jankowski J.. Majewska T., Mikulska M. (2011). Growth per- formance. carcass traits and meat quality of slowTer-growing and fast-growing chickens raised with and without outdoor access. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sei.. 24: 1407-1416.10.5713/ajas.2011.11038
  21. Murawska D. (2013). Age-related changes in the percentage content of edible and nonedible compo- nents in turkeys. Poultry Sei.. 92: 255-264.
  22. Nahashon S.N.. Ay or ined K.L.. Drummond R.Dewes M.. Smith E.J. (1999). Heterosis for growth related traits in White Plymouth Rock and single comb White Leghorn reciprocal crosses reared under two crude protein regimens. J. Anim. Feed Sei.. 8: 51-61.10.22358/jafs/68807/1999
  23. Nestor K.E.. Anderson J.W.. Hartzier D., Veileman S.G. (2005). Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkeys. 4. Body shape and carcass traits. Poultry Sei.. 84: 1825-1834.10.1093/ps/84.12.182516479937
  24. Richards F.J. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot.. 10: 290-300.
  25. Sarica M.. Oc ak N.. Karagay N.. Yamak U.. Kop C.Altom A. (2009). Growth, slaughter and gastrointestinal tract of three mrkey genotypes under bam and free-range housing systems. Brit.Poultry Sei.. 50: 487^94.10.1080/0007166090311091919735018
  26. Sheng Z.. Pettersson M.E.. Hu X.. Luo Ch.. Qu H.. Shu D.. Shen X.. Carlborg Ö., Li N. (2013). Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous x commercial broiler chicken cross. BMC Genomics. 14: 151-163.10.1186/1471-2164-14-151367973323497136
  27. Sola - Ojo F.E.. Ayorinde K.L. (2011). Evaluation of reproductive performance and egg quality traits in progenies of Dominant Black strain crossed with Fulani Ecotype chicken. J. Agr. Sei.. 3: 258-265.
  28. Zhao X.L., Siegel P.B..Liu Y.P.Wang Y.. Gilbert E.R.Zhu Q.. Zhang L. (2012). Hous- ing system affects broiler characteristics of local Chinese breed reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2405-2410.
  29. Zhong Z.. Muckley M.. Agcaogu A.. Grishan M.E.. Zhao H.. Orth M.. Liburn O.Akkus O. Karelier D.M. (2012). The morphological, material-level, and ash properties of turkey femurs from 3 different genetic strains during production. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2736-2746. 10.3382/ps.2012-0232223091126
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2014-0058 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 66
Submitted on: Jan 28, 2014
|
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2014
|
Published on: Mar 3, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2015 Krzysztof Damaziak, Monika Michalczuk, Żaneta Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Jan Niemiec, Dariusz Gozdowski, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.