References
- Aristovnik, A. and Obadić, A. (2015). The impact and efficiency of public administration excellence on fostering SMEs in EU countries. Amfiteatru economic, 17(39), 761–774.
- Bozeman, B. (1993). A Theory of Government ‘Red Tape’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–303.
- Braunerhjelm, P. and Eklund, J. E. (2014). Taxes, tax administrative burdens and new firm formation. Kyklos, 67(1), 1–11.
- Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R. and Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The Effect of Administrative Burden on Bureaucratic Perception of Policies: Evidence from Election Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x.
- Cărăuşan, M. (2016). Better Regulation a Renewed Impetus of the European Union. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 8, 114–121.
- Companies Act. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia 42/06, 65/09 – official consolidated text, 33/11, 91/11, 32/12, 57/12, 44/13 – odl. US, 82/13, 55/15, and 15/17.
- Couyoumdjian, J. B. (2012). Who walks out? Entrepreneurship in a global economy. International Review of Law and Economics, 32(1), 158–165, doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.001.
- Donelan, E. (2008). Administrative simplification, an overarching policy to maintain a balance between the protection of the public interest and interests of businesses. SIGMA, 8–9 May 2008, Ankara.
- Ðorðević, M. (2017). Zadržan odnos do lestvice držav Doing Business [Reserved Attitude towards Doing Business Scale], Pravna praksa, 36(20/21), 19–23.
- European Commission (2003). Commission Recommendation concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 1422) Official Journal L 124, 20. 5. 2003.
- European Commission (2007). Models to reduce the disproportionate regulatory burden on SMEs, Report of the Expert Group, Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission (2017). 2016 SBA Fact Sheet, Ref. Ares (2017)1735504 – 31/03/2017, 2017.
- Hauke, J. and Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones geographicae, 30(2), 87–93, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1.
- International SCM Network to reduce administrative burdens (2005). International Standard Cost Model Manual.
- Jáč, I. and Vondráčková, M. (2017). The Perception of Selected Aspects of Investment Attractiveness by Businesses Making Investments in the Czech Republic. E&M Ekonomika a Management, 20(3), 118–132, doi: 0.15240/tul/001/2017-3-008.
- Kaufman, W. and Feeney, M. K. (2012). Objective Formalization, Perceived Formalization and Perceived Red Tape. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195–1214, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662447.
- Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. (2014). Beyond the Rules: The Effect of Outcome Favourability on Red Tape Perceptions. Public Administration, 92(1), 178–191, doi: 10.1111/padm.12049.
- Kovač, P. (2018). Potentials of administrative procedures as a participatory tool within governance models in Central and Eastern Europe. Danube: law and economics review, 9(4), 227–244.
- Kovač, P. and Jukić, T. (2017). Recent Regional Developments in Red Tape Reduction – a Content Analysis of Web of Science Journals. Lex localis, 15(3), 433–457, doi: 10.4335/15.3.433-457 (2017).
- Kovač, P. and Sever, T. (2016). Sistemski vidiki razumevanja koncepta odprave administrativnih ovir [Systemic Aspects of Understanding the Concept of Red Tape Reduction]. In Dečman, M. (ed.). Učinkovitost storitev + demokratičnost oblasti = dobro upravljanje? [Efficiency of Services + Democracy of Authority = Good Governance?]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration.
- Obadić, A., Ravšelj, D. and Aristovnik, A. (2020). Administrative Barriers in the Field of Employment in the EU: Empirical Evidence from Croatia and Slovenia. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), 8(2), 533–553.
- OECD (2003). From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECD Countries, OECD.
- OECD (2008). Forum on Tax Administration: Taxpayers Services Sub-group. Programs to Reduce Administrative Burden of Tax Regulations in Selected Countries, 2008, [Online] at https://www.oecd.org/ctp/administration/39947998.pdf, accessed December 20, 2019.
- Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H. and Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational Effectiveness and Bureaucratic Red Tape: A Multimethod Study. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.
- Pandey, S. K. and Scott, P. G. (2002). Red Tape: A Review and Assessment of Concepts and Measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003547.
- Radaelli, C.M. and De Francesco, F. (Eds.) (2007). Regulatory Quality in Europe – Concepts, Measures and Policy Processes. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
- Ravšelj, D. and Aristovnik, A. (2020). The Relationship between Tax-Related Administrative Barriers and SMEs Characteristics: Evidence from Slovenia. European Research Studies Journal, 23(1), 381–388.
- Ravšelj, D., Kovač, P., & Aristovnik, A. (2019). Tax-Related Burden on SMEs in the European Union: The Case of Slovenia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 69–79.
- Rosenfeld, R. A. (1984). An Expansion and Application of Kaufman’s Model of Red Tape: The Case of Community Development Block Grants. The Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 603–620.
- Schulz, M. (1998). Limits to Bureaucratic Growth: The Density Dependence of Organizational Rule Births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 845–876.
- Statistical Office RS (2017). SiStat Database. Ljubljana: Statistical Office RS. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en.
- Szczepański, M. (European Parliament) (2016). Barriers to SME growth in Europe, Briefing.
- The World Bank (2016, 2017, 2020). Doing Business. Retrieved September 23, 2020, from https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/slovenia.
- Virant, G. and Kovač, P. (2010). Reducing administrative burdens as part of the “better regulation” programme – The case of Slovenia. Lex localis, 8(4), 369–390, doi: 10.4335/8.4.369-390 (2010).