References
- Ambrus, I. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and Hungarian substantive criminal law. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 16(7–8), 462–471.
- Covolo, V. (2019). The EU Response to Criminal Misuse of Cryptocurrencies: The young, already outdated 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive. University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper Series No. 2019-015 p 15.10.2139/ssrn.3503535
- De Sanctis, F. M. (2019). Technology-Enhanced Methods of Money Laundering: Internet as Criminal Means. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-18330-1
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF) (2021). Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers.
- Gál, I. L., Tóth, M. (2004). The Fight against Money Laundering in Hungary. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 8(2), 186–192.10.1108/13685200510621118
- Haffke, L., Fromberger, M. Zimmermann, P. (2020). Cryptocurrencies and anti-money laundering: the shortcomings of the fifth AML Directive (EU) and how to address them. Journal of Banking Regulation, 21(2), 125–138.10.1057/s41261-019-00101-4
- Poskriakov, F., Chiriaeva, M., Cavin, C. (2019). Cryptocurrency compliance and risks: a European KYC/AMLP perspective. In Josias Dewey (ed.): Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation 2019, Global Legal Group.
- Ramalho, D. S., Matos, N. I. (2021). What we do in the (digital) shadows: anti-money laundering regulation and a bitcoin-mixing criminal problem. ERA Forum 2021, 22, 487–506.10.1007/s12027-021-00676-4
- U.S. Department of Justice. (2018). Report of the Attorney General’s Cyber Digital Task Force. Washington.