References
- Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Biehl, J., & Locke, P. (Eds.) (2017). Unfinished: The Anthropology of Becoming. Durham: Duke UP.
- Canagarajah, S. (2002). A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Canagarajah, S. (2018). Foreword: Complexifying our Understanding of Spirituality. In S. M. Wong, & A. Mahboob, Spirituality and English Language Teaching (pp. ix -xiii). Bristol: Multilingual Matter.
- Canagarajah, S. (2022). Language Incompetence: Learning to Communicate through Cancer, Disability, and Anomalous Embodiment. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Deumert, A. (2022). The sound of absent -presence: Towards formulating a sociolinguistics of the spectre. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 135-153. DOI: 10.1075/aral.21039.deu.
- Duszak, A. (1997a). Analyzing digressiveness in Polish academic texts. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse (pp. 323-341). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Duszak, A. (1997b). Cross -cultural academic communication: a discourse--community view. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse (pp. 11-39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Ellis, C. (1995). Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(1),68-98.
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman: London.
- Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of language in a social ‑semiotic perspective (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking Otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463-488.
- Lee, A. S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 342-365.
- Lehman, I. M., & Tienari, J. (2024). What do you mean? Linguistic sensitivity and relational reflexivity in scholarly writing. Organization, 0(0).
- Lehman, I. M., Tienari, J., Hyland, K., & Alejandro, A. (2024). Forum: The Case for Reflexive Writing Practices in Management Communication and Organization Studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 0(0). DOI: 10.1177/08933189241227943.
- Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. 1st edition. Routledge.
- Luhrmann, T. M. (2023). Anthropology as spiritual discipline. American Ethnologist, 1-4.
- Pal, M., Kim, H., Harris, K. L., Long, Z., Linabary, J., Wilhoit Larson, E., … & Dempsey, S. E. (2022). Decolonizing organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3),547-577.
- Peterson, B. L., & McNamee, L. G. (2020). Reclaiming the “native” in organizational communication research. Ohio Communication Journal, 58, 120-131.
- Richardson, L. (1990). Writing Strategies: Reaching Diverse Audiences. Sage.
- Sinclair, A., & Grey, C. (2006). Writing differently. Organization, 13(3), 443-453.
- Tracy, S. J., Eger, E. K., Huffman, T. P., Malvini Redden, S. M., & Scarduzio, J. A. (2014). Narrating the backstage of qualitative research in organizational communication: A synthesis. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 422-431.