References
- Blaszka, M., Burch, L. M., Frederick, E. L., Clavio, G. & Walsh, P. (2012). #WorldSeries: An empirical examination of a Twitter hashtag during a major sporting event. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4): 435–453.
- Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10: P10008. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 - Bruns, A. (2008). Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. Information Polity, 13(1–2): 71–85.
- Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13–28). New York: Peter Lang.
- Bruns, A. & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). New York: Peter Lang.
- Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Banks, J., Tjondronegoro, D., Dreiling, A., Hartley, J., Leaver, T., Aly, A., Highfield, T., Wilken, R., Rennie, E., Lusher, D., Allen, M., Marshall, D., Demetrious, K. & Sadkowsky, T. (2016). TrISMA: Tracking infrastructure for social media analysis. Retrieved from
http://trisma.org/ [Accessed 2018, December 7]. - Bruns, A., Moon, B., Münch, F. & Sadkowsky, T. (2017). The Australian Twittersphere in 2016: Mapping the follower/followee network. Social Media + Society, 3(4): 1–15. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117748162 . - Burgess, J. & Bruns, A. (2015). Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn. In G. Langlois, J. Redden & G. Elmer (eds.), Compromised data: From social media to big data (pp. 94–111). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Coleman, S. (2003). A tale of two houses: The House of Commons, the Big brother house and the people at home. Parliamentary Affairs, 56: 733–758. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg113 . - Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4): 525–535. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270 - Cunningham, S. (2001). Popular media as public “sphericules” for diasporic communities. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(2): 131–147. doi:
http://doi.org10.1177/136787790100400201 - Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dixon, D. (2012). Analysis tool or research methodology? Is there an epistemology for patterns? In D. M. Berry (ed.), Understanding digital humanities (pp. 191–209). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In J. Curran & T. Liebes (eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 175–202). London: Routledge.
- Griffin, A. (2016, September 23). Shitposting: What is the bizarre online behaviour that could win Donald Trump the election? The Independent [online]. Retrieved from
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/what-is-shitposting-donald-trump-us-election-2016-palmer-luckey-a7326111.html [Accessed 2018, December 7]. - Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16: 411–426. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x . - Haddon, L. (2016). The domestication of complex media repertoires. In K. Sandvik, A. M. Thorhauge & B. Valtysson (eds.), The media and the mundane: Communication across media in everyday life (pp. 17–29). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
- Highfield, T. (2013). National and state-level politics on social media: Twitter, Australian political discussions, and the online commentariat. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(4): 342–360. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.060648 . - Highfield, T. (2014). Following the yellow jersey: Tweeting the Tour de France. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 249–262). New York: Peter Lang.
- Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLOS ONE, 9(6) doi:
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 - Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2014). Twitter in politics and elections: Insights from Scandinavia. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 319–330). New York: Peter Lang.
- Marwick, A. E. & boyd, danah (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1): 114–133. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 . - McEwan, S. (2017). Nation of shitposters: Ironic engagement with the Facebook posts of Shannon Noll as reconfiguration of an Australian national identity. Journal of Media and Communication, 8(2): 19–39.
- McKinnon, M., Semmens, D., Moon, B., Amarasekara, I. & Bolliet, L. (2016). Science, Twitter and election campaigns: Tracking #auspol in the Australian federal elections. Journal of Science Communication, 15(6). doi:
http://doi.org/10.22323/2.15060204 . - McNamara, L. (2016, September 1). Explainer: What is Section 18C and why do some politicians want it changed? The Conversation [online]. Retrieved from
https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-section-18c-and-why-do-some-politicians-want-it-changed-64660 [Accessed 2018, December 7]. - Münch, F. (2019). Measuring networked media – Exploring network science methods for large scale online media studies. PhD Dissertation. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
- Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
- Palen, L., Starbird, K., Vieweg, S. & Hughes, A. (2010). Twitter-based information distribution during the 2009 Red River Valley flood threat. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(5): 13–17.
- Papacharissi, Z. & Blasiola, S. (2016). Structures of feeling, storytelling, and social media: The case of #Egypt. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson & C. Christensen (eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 211–222). London: Routledge.
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.
- Pear Analytics. (2009). Twitter study–August 2009. Retrieved from
http://www.pearanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf [Accessed 2018, December 7]. - Rambukkana, N. (ed.). (2015). Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks. New York: Peter Lang.
- Rogers, R. (2014). Foreword: Debanalising Twitter: The transformation of an object of study. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. ix–xxvi). New York: Peter Lang.
- Sandvik, K., Thorhauge, A. M. & Valtysson, B. (2016). Introduction. In K. Sandvik, A. M. Thorhauge & B. Valtysson (eds.), The media and the mundane: Communication across media in everyday life (pp. 9–15). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
- Senft, T. M. (2013). Microcelebrity and the branded self. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess & A. Bruns (eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 346–354). London: Blackwell.
- Sensis. (2016). Sensis social media report 2016: How Australian people and businesses are using social media. Melbourne: Sensis. Retrieved from
https://www.sensis.com.au/asset/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2016.PDF [Accessed 2018, December 7]. - Shaw, F., Burgess, J., Crawford, K. & Bruns, A. (2013). Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks: Patterns of talk on Twitter during the Queensland floods. Australian Journal of Communication, 40(1): 23–39.
- Simon, J. & Ess, C. (2015). Philosophy & Technology, 28(1): 157–162. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0189-8 . - Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Van Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1): 2–14. doi:
http://doi.org.10.12924/mac2013.01010002 .
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 30
Published on: Jun 28, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Axel Bruns, Brenda Moon, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.