Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Linking the triple helix (university-industry-government) to the quadruple helix of university-industry-government – civil society in the field of international business and economics Cover

Linking the triple helix (university-industry-government) to the quadruple helix of university-industry-government – civil society in the field of international business and economics

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Bengt-Åke, L, Johnson, B. Sloth Andersen, B. Dalum, B (2002) National systems of production, innovation and competence building. ELSEVIER. Research Policy 31 (2002), 213-23110.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
  2. Boardman, C., Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. Journal of Technology Transfer 35, 445-459.10.1007/s10961-010-9162-y
  3. Brännback, M., Carsrud, A., Krueger, N., Elfving, J. (2008). Challenging the Triple Helix model of regional innovation systems: a venture centric model, International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, special issue on “Financing Biotech companies", forthcoming.10.1504/IJTE.2008.020539
  4. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2 (3), 327-37210.1007/s13132-011-0058-3
  5. (http://www.springerlink.com/content/d1lr223321305579/).
  6. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. (2012) - Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems Twenty-first-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. Springer Briefs in Business 7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1, Darling-Hammond, L. (2010) - The Flat World and Education. New York: Teachers College Press.10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1-.(2010)-.:
  7. Dima, A. & Vasilache, S. (2016). Trends in the internationalization of European higher education in a convergence perspective. Management & Marketing, 11(2), pp. 449-457. Retrieved 25 Feb. 2018, from doi:10.1515/mmcks-2016-0008
  8. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V-P. & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation - A European approach. Retrieved from http://www.vinnova.se/upload/dokument/Verksamhet/TITA/Stateoftheart_LivingLabs_Eriksson2005.pdf on 12 August 2009.
  9. Etzkowitz, H. 1993. Technology transfer: The second academic revolution. Technology Access Report 6, 7-9.
  10. Etzkowitz, H. Leydesdorff, L. (1998).The endless transition: A "triple helix" of universityindustry- government relations. Minerva 36, 203-208.10.1023/A:1004348123030
  11. Etzkowitz, H., and Zhou, C. (2006). Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability, Science and Public Policy, volume 33, number 1, pp 77-83.10.3152/147154306781779154
  12. Ghinea, V. M., Dima, A. M., & Hadad, S. (2017). EXCELLENCE MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE CONVERGENCE IN THE EU HIGHER EDUCATION. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(11), 1107-1122.
  13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, Sage.
  14. Gladwin, T. Kennelly, J. Tara-Shelomith, K (1995) - Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development. Implications for management Theory and Research. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), pp. 874-907.10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024
  15. Goleman, D. Richard, E. Boyatzis, A (2013) - Primal Leadership: Unleashing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press. 2013.
  16. Hadad, S. (2017), “Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania”, Management & Marketing, Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 12(3), 416-430. DOI: 10.1515/mmcks-2017-0025.10.1515/mmcks-2017-0025
  17. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Configurational Information as Potentially Negative Entropy: The Triple Helix Model. Entropy 10, 391-410.10.3390/e10040391
  18. Liljemark, T. (2004) Innovation Policy in Canada. Strategy and Realities. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies. Stockholm.
  19. Miron, D. (2008) Linking the double helix of learning and work to the triple helix of university-industry-government in the Europe of knowledge, Management & Marketing (2008), 3(4), 3-20.
  20. Robinson, K. (2001) Out of Our Minds. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing, 2001, p. 155.
  21. Schienstock, G. Hämäläinen, T. (2001) Transformation of the Finnish innovation system: A network approach. Sitra Report Series. January 2001.
  22. Schwab Klaus (2016)The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. Geneva Switzerland.
  23. Thomke, S. von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review.
  24. Walt, M.S. (2018) America’s IR Schools Are Broken. There’s a lot of innovation on the surface, but the rot runs deep. Here’s how to fix it. Foreign Policy. 20th of February 2018.
  25. Yawson, R. M. (2009) The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy. The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference, Vienna, Austria, June 21-24, 2009.10.2139/ssrn.1417676
  26. Zucker, L. Darby, M. Amstrong, J.S. (2002) Comercializing Knowledge: University Science. Knowledge Capture and Firm Performance in Biotechmology. Management Science. 48 (1). 2002.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274
  27. Zucker, L. Darby, M. Brewer, M. (1998) Intelectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises, American Review. 88, 290-306.
Language: English
Page range: 612 - 625
Published on: Jun 15, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Dumitru Miron, Ioan Alexandru Gherasim, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.