References
- Adams, G. R. (1985). Identity and political socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (30), 61-77.
- Alvarez-Jimenez, A. (2012). Boundary agreements in the International Court of Justice’s case law, 2000–2010. European Journal of International Law, 23(2), 495-515.
- Armet, S. (2009). Religious socialization and identity formation of adolescents in high tension religions. Review of Religious Research, 50(3), 277-297.
- Ayob, S. M., Yee, C. H., Muhamad, N. D., & Jusoh, A. (2005, November). A new hybrid multilevel inverter topology with harmonics profile improvement. In 2005 International Conference on Power Electronics and Drives Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 999-1002). IEEE.
- Barker, R. G. (1963). Kurt Lewin Memorial Award Address – 1963. On the Nature of the Environment. Journal of Social Issues, 19(4), 16.
- Bilberg, A., & Malik, A. A. (2019). Digital twin driven human–robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 499-502.
- Bottero, W., & Crossley, N. (2011). Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 99-119.
- Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195-220.
- Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25.
- Bourdieu, P., & Chartier, R. (1989). Gens à histoire, gens sans histoire: dialogue Bourdieu/Chartier. Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique, 2(6), 53-60.
- Bourdieu, P. (1994). The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (2003). The Formation of the Economic Habitus. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 150(5), 79-90.
- Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. (2013). K urt L ewin’s Field Theory: A Review and Re‐evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 408-425.
- Chakraborty, R., & De, S. (2022). Camouflaged Protocols of Womanhood: Inherent Paradoxes of Bengal. Psychological Studies, 67(4), 488-500.
- Chandler, W. M. (1974). Peer-group socialization among German students. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 7(4), 687-700.
- Ciofu, I., Kondort, G., Pop, S., Cioc, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Business Operations: Exploring Productivity and Acceptance. Analele Universității din Oradea. Seria Științe Economice, XXXIII(2), 263-274.
- Davis, J. (2013). Identity Invisibility and Social Forces. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
- Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2018). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 467-483.
- De Vries, E. L.E. (2019). When more likes is not better: the consequences of high and low likes-to-followers ratios for perceived account credibility and social media marketing effectiveness. Marketing Letters, 30(3), 275-291.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
- Edelman, M. (1978). Space and the social order. Journal of Architectural Education, 32(2), 2-7.
- Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Turel, O. (2022). Followers’ problematic engagement with influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107288.
- Fischer-Kattner, A. (2018). Violent Encounters at Ostend, 1601–1604: Patiality, Location, and Identity in Early Modern Siege Warfare. Comparativ, 28(2), 22-41.
- French, S. E., Coleman, B. R., & DiLorenzo, M. L. (2013). Linking racial identity, ethnic identity, and racial-ethnic socialization: A tale of three race-ethnicities. Identity, 13(1), 1-45.
- Gans, H. J. (2002). The sociology of space: a use–centered view. City & Community, 1(4), 329-339.
- Henle, M. (1978). Kurt Lewin as metatheorist. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 233-237.
- Irgaliyev, A. (2024). Analysis of Digital Socialization Concepts: Indicators and Criteria of Digital Socialization. Journal of Psychology & Sociology, 90(3), 18.
- Kariel, H. S. (1956). Democracy unlimited: Kurt Lewin’s field theory. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 280-289.
- Kelly, I. (1987). Hong Kong: a political-geographic analysis. The Macmillan Press Ltd., Houndmills, Basingstoke.
- Kostromina, S., & Grishina, N. (2023). Psychology of Changeability: Basic Principles of Description of Processual Nature of Personality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57(2), 569-589.
- Langemeyer, I. (2023). Beyond the concept of “Gestalten”–Kurt Lewin and Lev Semënovic Vygotsky as methodologically related. Gestalt Theory, 45(3), 287-300.
- Lewin, K. (1936). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 84(5), 612-613.
- Lewin, K. (1937). Psychoanalysis and topological psychology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1(6), 202.
- Lewin, M. A. (1977). Kurt Lewin’s view of social psychology: The crisis of 1977 and the crisis of 1927. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 159-172.
- Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. American Psychological Association.
- Lewin, K., & Blower, J. (2009). The landscape of war. Art in Translation, 1(2), 199-209.
- Martin, L.J. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1-49.
- Morehouse, B. (1995). A functional approach to boundaries in the context of environmental issues. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 10(2), 53-73.
- Oancea, M. (2024). AI and Deep Fake-Video and Audio Manipulation Techniques Capable of Altering the Political Process. Revista de Științe Politice / Revue des Sciences Politiques, (81), 70-82.
- Qi, Z. (2021). The Construction of a Learning Field Based on Lewin’s Equation for Behavior. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 9(6), 1-17.
- Rosch, E. (2002). Lewin’s field theory as situated action in organizational change. Organization Development Journal, 20(2), 8-14.
- Roşca, V. I. (2020). Kurt Lewin: His life and his approach to change management. Editura ASE, Bucharest.
- Roşca, V. I. (2020). Implications of Lewin’s field theory on social change. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 617-625).
- Skea, R. (2021). Leadership, Organizational Change and Sensemaking. Routledge.
- Szafraniec, K. (2017). The contemporary context of youth socialization: the specificity of post-communist countries. Polish Sociological Review, 198(2), 167-187.
- Teschendorf, B., & Nemshick, M. (2001). Faculty roles in professional socialization. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 15(1), 4-10.
- Weiss, P. (1992). Creative Ventures. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.
- Wong, W. C. (2001). Co‐constructing the Personal Space‐ Time Totality: Listening to the Dialogue of Vygotsky, Lewin, Bronfenbrenner, and Stern. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(4), 365-382.