Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Higher Education in the Age of AI: Chatgpt’s Impact on Students’ Academic Activities Cover

Higher Education in the Age of AI: Chatgpt’s Impact on Students’ Academic Activities

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., El Khatib, S., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., Hallit, S., & Sallam, M. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Sci Rep 14, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8.
  2. Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of Industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527.
  3. Acosta-Enriquez, B.G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M.A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Saavedra Tirado, K. (2024a). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychol 12, 255 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z.
  4. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Pérez Vargas, C. G., Huamaní Jordan, O., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., & Paredes Morales, A. E. (2024b). Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320.
  5. Adžić, S., Tot, T. S., Vukovic, V., Radanov, P., & Avakumović, J. (2024). Understanding student attitudes toward GenAI tools: A comparative study of Serbia and Austria. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 12(3), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-3-583-611.
  6. Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, M., Ghadi, Y. Y., Shahzad, T., Mallek, F., & Hamam, H. (2024). Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219.
  7. Al-Dokhny, A., Alismaiel, O., Youssif, S., Nasr, N., Drwish, A., & Samir, A. (2024). Can multimodal large language models enhance performance benefits among higher education students? An investigation based on the task–technology fit theory and the artificial intelligence device use acceptance model. Sustainability, 16(23), 10780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310780.
  8. Alahmadi, M. D., Alharbi, M., Tayeb, A., & Alshangiti, M. (2024). Evaluating large language models’ proficiency in answering Arabic GAT exam questions. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 14(6), 17774-17780. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8481.
  9. Alfiras, M.I.I., Emran, A.Q., Bojiah, J., Al Farsi, M.M., Shobbar, S., Alhawi, O.A. (2025). ChatGPT in Education Between Advantages, Authority and Ethics: A Rapid Literature Review. In: AlDhaen, E., Braganza, A., Hamdan, A., Chen, W. (eds) Business Sustainability with Artificial Intelligence (AI): Challenges and Opportunities. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 566. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71318-7_12 .
  10. Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., & Andoh, R. P. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346.
  11. Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Acosta Enríquez, B. G., Ramos Farroñán, E. V., García Juárez, H. D., Cruz Salinas, L. E., Blas Sánchez, J. E., Arbulú Castillo, J. C., Licapa-Redolfo, G. S., & Farfán Chilicaus, G. C. (2024). The sustainable integration of AI in higher education: Analyzing ChatGPT acceptance factors through an extended UTAUT2 framework in Peruvian universities. Sustainability, 16(23), 10707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310707.
  12. Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294.
  13. Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: Peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4.
  14. Bouteraa, M., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K. A., Benlahcene, A., Sadallah, M., Zaki, H. O., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Fook, L. M., & Chekima, B. (2024). Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students’ integrity matter? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402.
  15. Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J.W.M. et al. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Educ Inf Technol 29, 15403– 15439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0.
  16. Cake, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a collaborative tool for script development. Media Practice and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2025.2454074.
  17. Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197.
  18. Eloundou, T., Beutel, A., Robinson, D. G., Gu-Lemberg, K., Brakman, A.-L., Mishkin, P., Shah, M., Heidecke, J., Weng, L., & Kalai, A. T. (2024, October 15). First-person fairness in chatbots. OpenAI. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/first-person-fairness-in-chatbots.pdf.
  19. Fiialka, S., Kornieva, Z., & Honcharuk, T. (2023). ChatGPT in Ukrainian Education: Problems and Prospects. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.42215.
  20. Gao, Y. (2025). Deep learning-based strategies for evaluating and enhancing university teaching quality. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100362.
  21. Gao, R., Merzdorf, H. E., Anwar, S., Hipwell, M. C., & Srinivasa, A. R. (2024). Automatic assessment of text-based responses in post-secondary education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100206.
  22. Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1), Article 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072.
  23. Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. Int J Educ Integr 20, 2 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4.
  24. Kacperski, C., Ulloa, R., Bonnay, D., Kulshrestha, J., Selb, P., & Spitz, A. (2025). Characteristics of ChatGPT users from Germany: Implications for the digital divide from web tracking data. PLoS ONE, 20(1), e0309047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309047.
  25. Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225.
  26. Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
  27. Lewandowski, M., Łukowicz, P., Świetlik, D. and Barańska-Rybak, W., (2024). ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 dermatological knowledge level based on the Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 49(6), pp.686–691. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llad255.
  28. Mogavi, R. H., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H. S., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L. E., & Hui, P. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027.
  29. Ngo, T. N., & Hastie, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module. English for Specific Purposes, 77, 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.09.001.
  30. Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024). Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices. Discover Education, 3(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4.
  31. OpenAI. (2022). About. OpenAI. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://openai.com/about/
  32. Parker, L., Carter, C., Karakas, A., Loper, A. J., & Sokkar, A. (2024). Graduate instructors navigating the AI frontier: The role of ChatGPT in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100166.
  33. Parveen, K., Phuc, T. Q. B., Alghamdi, A. A., Hajjej, F., Obidallah, W. J., Alduraywish, Y. A., & Shafiq, M. (2024). Unraveling the dynamics of ChatGPT adoption and utilization through Structural Equation Modeling. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74406-4.
  34. Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024). Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse. J Acad Ethics 22, 89– 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6.
  35. Radtke, A., & Rummel, N. (2025). Generative AI in academic writing: Does information on authorship impact learners’ revision behavior? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100350.
  36. Rudolph, J., Ismail, M. F. B. M., & Popenici, S. (2024). Higher education’s generative artificial intelligence paradox: The meaning of chatbot mania. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/54fs5e77.
  37. Shorey, S., Mattar, C., Lanz-Brian Pereira, T., & Choolani, M. (2024). A scoping review of ChatGPT’s role in healthcare education and research. Nurse Education Today, 135, 106121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106121.
  38. Vorontsova, A., Tarasenko, S., Duranowski, W., Durasiewicz, A., Soss, J., & Bilovol, A. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of the economic effects of using artificial intelligence and ChatGPT tools in higher education institutions. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.08.
  39. Wang, L., & Ren, B. (2024). Enhancing academic writing in a linguistics course with generative AI: An empirical study in a higher education institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329.
  40. Watermeyer, R., Phipps, L., Lanclos, D. & Knight, C. (2024). Generative AI and the Automating of Academia. Postdigit Sci Educ 6, 446–466 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00440-6.
Language: English
Page range: 3360 - 3376
Published on: Jul 24, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Alexandra Constantin, Silvia-Elena Iacob, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.