Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sex-Dependent Individual Differences and the Correlational Relationship Between Proprioceptive and Verbal Tests Cover

Sex-Dependent Individual Differences and the Correlational Relationship Between Proprioceptive and Verbal Tests

Open Access
|Nov 2014

References

  1. 1. Gironell A., Liutsko L., Muinos R., Tous J.M. (2012). Differences based on fine motor behaviour in Parkinson's patients compared to an age matched control group in proprioceptive and visuo-proprioceptive test conditions. Anuario de Psicologia 42(2), 183-197.
  2. 2. Liutsko L. (2014). Age and sex differences in proprioception (fine motor precision). Scholars' Press.
  3. 3. Liutsko L., Tous J.M. (2014). Sex and cultural differences in proprioception based on fine motor performance. Perso- nality and Individual Differences 60(Supplement), S29. DOI: 10.1016/j paid. 2013.07.050.
  4. 4. Mira E. (1923). Somatic reactions of mental work. Doctoral thesis. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, [in Spanish]
  5. 5. Luria A.R. (1932). The nature of human conflicts. New York: Liveright Publishers.
  6. 6. Mira E. (1958). Myokinetic psychodiagnosis (M. K. P.). New York: Logos.
  7. 7. Tous Ral J.M., Muinos R., Tous Lopez O., Tous Rovirosa J.M. (2012). Proprioceptive diagnostics of temperament and character. Barcelona:UniversidaddeBarcelona. [inSpanish]
  8. 8. Liutsko L. (2013). Proprioception as a basis for individual differences. Psycholog}' in Russia: State of the Art 6(3), 107-119. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2013.0310.10.11621/pir.2013.0310
  9. 9. Tous J.M. (2008). Propioceptive diagnosis of temperament and characterDP-TC. Barcelona: Lab. Mira y Lopez, Depart- ment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treat- ments, University of Barcelona. DP-TC software, [in Spanish]
  10. 10. Liutsko L. (2012). The book review “Propioceptive diagnosis of temperament and character” (Tousetal. 2012). Anuario de Psicologia42(3), 421-422. [inSpanish]
  11. 11. Tous J.M., Viade A., Muinos R. (2007). Structural validity of lineograms of myokinetic psychodiagnosis, revised and digitalised (PMK-RD). Psicothema 19(2), 350-356. [in Spa- nish]
  12. 12. Muinos R. (2008). Miokinetic Psychodiagnosis: Development, description and confirmatory factorial analysis. Doctoral thesis, University of Barcelona, Barcelona. [inSpanish]
  13. 13. Liutsko L., Muinos R., Tous J. (2012). Relationship between emotional intelligence based on the proprioceptive information and academic performance in secondary school pupils, l" National Congress of Emocional Intelligence, 8-10 November 2012 (p. 30), Barcelona.
  14. 14. Liutsko L., Tous J.M. (2013). Quantitative and qualitative proprioceptive analysis of individual differences (description of Multiple sclerosis case study). Acta Neuropsychologica 11(3), 315-323. DOI: 10.5604/17307503.1084555.
  15. 15. Liutsko L., Tous J.M., Muinos R. (2012). The effects of proprioception on memory: a study of proprioceptive errors and results from the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure in a healthy population. Acta Neuropsychologica 10(4), 489-497. DOI: 10.5604/1730 75 03/103 02 08.
  16. 16. Liutsko L., Muinos R., Tous J.M. (2014). Age-related differences in proprioceptive and visuo-proprioceptive function in relation to fine motor behaviour. European Journal of Age- ing 11(3), 221-232. DOI: 10.1007/sl0433-013-0304-6.
  17. 17. Berezin F.B., Varric L.D., Gorelova E.S. (1976). Psychophysiological studies of migrant and indigenous population of the Far Northeast. Human adaptation to the conditions of the North. Petrozavodsk, [in Russian]
  18. 18. Miroshnikov M.P. (1963). Diagnostic meaning of psychomotricity and its study with use of miokinetic test. In L. Gissen (Ed.), Psycholog}'andpsychohigienein sport, C6., M. (pp. 15-32). [in Russian], 19. Ezhov S.N., Krivoshchekov S.G. (2004). Features of psycho- motor responses and interhemispheric relationships at various stages of adaptation to a new time zone. Human Physio- logy3Q(2), 172-175.10.1023/B:HUMP.0000021645.62494.0c
  19. 20. Draganova O.A. (2007). Psychopisiological markers of personal tolerance in adolescent period. Doctoral thesis, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, [in Rus- sian]
  20. 21. Tous J.M., Munos R., Liutsko L. (2014, in press). Personality differences of applicants for the gun license (proprioceptive and verbal tests). Los Anales de Psicologia 30(3). DOI: 10.6018/ analesps.30.3.171121.
  21. 22. Hromov A.B. (2000). The five-factor personality questionnaire. Manual. Kurgan: Kurgan State University, [in Russian]
  22. 23. Liutsko L., Tous-Ral J.M. (2012). Personality traits based on fine motor individual behaviour. In 4lh Russian Scientific Conference Psychology of Individuality, 22-24 November (p. 322), Moscow: Logos.
  23. 24. Sigmundsson II., Ilaga M., Hopkins B. (2007). Sex differences in perception: exploring the integration of sensory information with respect to vision and proprioception. Sex Roles 57,181-186.10.1007/s11199-007-9228-y
  24. 25. Rosenbaum D.A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology. The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behaviour. American Psychologist 60(4), 308-317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2014-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2082-8799 | Journal ISSN: 1899-1998
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 146
Submitted on: Jan 2, 2014
|
Accepted on: Jun 30, 2014
|
Published on: Nov 20, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 Liudmila Liutsko, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.