Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theory-Inspired Rather than Theory-Based Criticism: Towards a Semeiocritical Method for the Interpretation of Literature Cover

Theory-Inspired Rather than Theory-Based Criticism: Towards a Semeiocritical Method for the Interpretation of Literature

By: Khaled Besbes  
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Eliot, T. S. 2011 [1917]. The Waste Land and Other Poems. New York, NY: Broadway View Press.
  2. Barthes, Roland. 1970. S/Z. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  3. Bauerlein, Mark. 2007. Review of Theory’s Empire. In John Holbo (ed.), Framing Theory’s Empire, 1–6. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
  4. Birns, Nicholas. 2010. Theory after theory: An intellectual history of literary theory from 1950 to the early 21st century. Peterborough, Ont. & Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press.
  5. Bové, Paul. 1992. In the wake of theory. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  6. Chandler, Daniel. 1995. Semiotics for beginners. https://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/ (accessed 1 January 2019).
  7. Conway, Christopher. 2007. Essentializing theory: A testimonial. In John Holbo (ed.) Framing theory’s empire, 111–113. West Lafayette, IN.: Parlor Press.
  8. Culler, Jonathan D. 1975. Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge.
  9. Culler, Jonathan D. 1981. The pursuit of signs: Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.10.2307/3684090
  10. Culler, Jonathan D. 2007. The literary in theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  11. Cunningham, Valentine. 2002. Reading after theory. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Davis, Colin. 2004. After post-structuralism: Reading, stories and theory. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Docherty, Thomas. 1996. After theory (2nd edn). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  14. Dubreuil, Laurent. 2011. Literature after theory, or: the intellective turn. In Jane Elliott & Derek Attridge (eds), Theory after ‘theory’, 237–248. London: Routledge.
  15. Eagleton, Terry. 1983. Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis, MN & London: University of Minnesota Press.
  16. Eagleton, Terry. 2003. After theory. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  17. Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  18. Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
  19. Elam, Keir. 1980. The semiotics of theatre and drama. London & New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203993309
  20. Felski, Rita. 2015. The limits of critique. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001
  21. Fogarty, Sorcha. 2005. Binary oppositions. In Hugo Azerad, Edward Forman, David Houston Jones, Nigel Saint, Tim Unwin & David Williams (eds), The Literary Encyclopedia. Volume 1.5.2.07: Postwar and Contemporary French Writing and Culture, 1945–present.https://www.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?pec=true&UID=122 (accessed 1 January 2019).
  22. Good, Graham. 2001. Humanism betrayed: Theory, ideology and culture in the contemporary university. Montreal & Kingston: Mc Gill-Queen’s University Press.
  23. Holbo, John (ed.). 2007. Framing Theory’s Empire. West Lafayette, IN.: Parlor Press.
  24. Iser, Wolfgang. 1974. The implied reader. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801815690
  25. Knapp, Steven & Walter Benn Michaels. 1982. Against theory. Critical Inquiry, 8(4). 723–742.
  26. Leitch, Vincent B. 2014. Literary criticism in the 21st century: Theory renaissance. London: Bloomsbury.
  27. Mayer, John T. 1991. The Waste Land and Eliot’s poetry notebook. In Ronald Bush (ed.), T. S. Eliot: The modernist in history, 67–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. McCann, Sean. 2007. Theory’s Empire–wrestling the fog bank. In John Holbo (ed.), Framing Theory’s Empire, 61–68. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
  29. McQuillan, Martin, Graeme Macdonald, Robin Purves & Stephen Thomson (eds). 1999. Post-theory: New directions in criticism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  30. Olsen, Stein Haugrom. 1987. The end of literary theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051198349810.1017/CBO9780511983498
  31. Patai, Daphne & Will H. Corral. 2005. Theory’s Empire: An anthology of dissent. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  32. Payne, Michael & John Schad (eds). 2003. Life.after.theory. London: Continuum.
  33. Punday, Daniel. 2003. Narrative after deconstruction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  34. Schad, John. 2003. Preface. What are we after? In Michael Payne & John Schad (eds), Life.after.theory, ix–xi. London: Continuum.
  35. Selden, Raman, Peter Widdowson & Peter Brooke (eds). 2005. A reader’s guide to contemporary literary theory (5th edn). London: Pearson Longman.
  36. Stevens, Anne H. 2015. Literary theory and criticism: An introduction. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.
  37. Tyson, Lois. 2014. Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide (3rd edn). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315760797
  38. Wallen, Jeffrey. 2007. The death and discontents of literary theory. In John Holbo (ed.), Framing Theory’s Empire, 133–134. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2019-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 41
Published on: Jul 30, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Khaled Besbes, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.