Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantified Analyses of Aggression Pattern in a Captive Population of Musk Deer (Moschus Sifanicus) Cover

Quantified Analyses of Aggression Pattern in a Captive Population of Musk Deer (Moschus Sifanicus)

Open Access
|Jul 2012

References

  1. Altmann J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-267.
  2. Andersen I. L., Nævdal E., Bakken M., Bøe KE. (2004). Aggression and group size in domesticated pigs, Sus scrofa: when the winner takes it all and the loser is standing small. Anim. Behav., 68 (4): 965-975.
  3. Aryal A., Subedi A. (2011). Conservation and potential habitat of Himalayan musk deer Moschus chrysogaster in the protected areas of Nepal. Int. J. Conserv. Sci., 2 (2): 127-141.
  4. Aryal A., Raubenheimer D., Subedi S., Kattel B. (2010). Spatial habitat overlap and habitat preference of Himalayan musk deer Moschus chrysogaster in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 2 (3): 217-225.
  5. Barroso F. G., Alados C. L., Boza J. (2000). Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 69: 35-53.
  6. Bornet H. L. I., Morgan C. A., Lawrence A. B., Mann J. (2000). The effect of group housing on feeding patterns and social behavior of previously individually housed growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 70: 127-141.
  7. Bro-Jørgensen J. (2002). Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99 (14): 9290-9293.
  8. Cassinello J., Pieters I. (2000). Multi-male captive groups of endangered dama gazelle: social rank, aggression, and enclosure effects. Zoo Biol., 191 (2): 121-129.
  9. Clutton-Brock T. H. (1982). The function of antlers. Behaviour, 78: 108-125.
  10. Eccles T. R., Shackleton D. M. (1986). Correlates and consequences of social status in female bighorn sheep. Anim. Behav., 34: 1392-1401.
  11. Estevez I., Andersen I. L., Nævdal E. (2007). Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 103: 185-204.
  12. Green M. J. B. (1986). The distribution, status and conservation of the Himalayan musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster). Biol. Conserv., 35: 347-375.
  13. Green M. J. B. (1987). Scent-marking in the Himalayan musk deer. J. Zool., 1: 721-737.
  14. Heitor F., do Mar Oom M., Vicente L. (2006). Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses: Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours. Behav. Process., 73 (3): 231-239.
  15. Homes V. (1999). On the scent: Conserving musk deer - the uses of musk and Europe's role in its trade. TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
  16. Kaufmann J. H. (1983). On the definition and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biol. Rev., 58: 1-20.
  17. Kim T., Zuk M. (2000). The effects of age and previous experience on social rank in female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus spadiceus. Anim. Behav., 60: 239-244.
  18. Komers P. E., Pelabon C., Stenstrom D. (1997). Age at first reproduction in fallow deer: age-specific versus dominance-specific behaviors. Behav. Ecol., 8: 456-462.
  19. Kondo S., Hurnik J. F. (1990). Stablization of social hierarchy in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 27: 287-297.
  20. Mattiangeli V., Mattiello S., Verga M. (1999). The fighting technique of male fallow deer (Dama dama): an analysis of agonistic interactions during the rut. J. Zool., 249, 3: 339-346.
  21. Meng X., Yang Q. F. Z., Xia L., Wang P., Jiang Y., Bai Z., Li G. (2002). Preliminary studies on the activity during summer, autumn and winter season in captive Alpine musk deer. Acta Theriol. Sin., 22: 87-97.
  22. Meng X., Yang Q., Xia L., Feng Z., Jiang Y., Wang P. (2003). The temporal estrous patterns of female alpine musk deer in captivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 82: 75-85.
  23. Meng X., Zhou C., HuJ., Li C., Meng Z., Feng J., Zhou Y., Zhu Y. (2006). The musk deer farming in China. Anim. Sci., 82: 1-6.
  24. Meng X., Zhao C., Hui C., Luan X. (2011). Behavioral aspects of captive alpine musk deer during non-mating season: gender differences and monthly patterns. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 24 (5): 707-712.
  25. Parry-Jones R., Wu J. Y. (2001). Musk deer farming as a conservation tool in China. TRAFFIC, East Asia, Hong Kong.
  26. Sheng H. (1992). Deer of China (in Chinese with English abstract). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai.
  27. Sheng H., Ohtaishi N. (1993). Editors. Deer of China: Biology and Management. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  28. Shrestha M. N. (1998). Animal welfare in the musk deer. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 59: 245-250.
  29. Syme G. J., Syme L. A. (1979). Social structure in farm animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  30. Wittemyer G., Getz W. M. (2007). Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta Africana. Anim. Behav., 73 (4): 671-681.
  31. Yang Q., Meng X., Feng Z., Xia L. (2003). Conservation status and causes of decline of musk deer in China. Biol. Conserv., 109: 333-342.
  32. Zhang B. (1979). The farming of musk deer in China (in Chinese). Agriculture Press, Beijing.
  33. Zhang B. (1983). Musk deer: their capture, domestication and care according to Chinese experience and methods. Unasylva, 35: 16-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10220-012-0035-1 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 413 - 421
Published on: Jul 24, 2012
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2012 Xiuxiang Meng, Andrew Sih, Haitao Li, Nicholas Cody, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.