Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Determining whether Community Health Workers are ‘Deployment Ready’ Using Standard Setting Cover

Determining whether Community Health Workers are ‘Deployment Ready’ Using Standard Setting

Open Access
|Nov 2018

References

  1. World Health Organization. Strengthening the performance of community health workers in primary health care: report of a WHO Study Group [meeting held in Geneva from 2 to 9 December 1987]; 1989.
  2. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G, et al. Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related Millennium Development Goals: A systematic review, country case studies and recommendations for scaling up. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance; 2010.
  3. Lehmann U and Sanders D. The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  4. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
  5. Perry HB, Zulliger R and Rogers MM. Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35: 399421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354
  6. Rich ML, Miller AC, Niyigena P, et al. Excellent clinical outcomes and high retention in care among adults in a community-based HIV treatment program in rural Rwanda. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2012; 59(3): e35e42. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824476c4
  7. Torpey KE, Kabaso ME, Mutale LN, et al. Adherence support workers: A way to address human resource constraints in antiretroviral treatment programs in the public health setting in Zambia. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5): e2204. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002204
  8. Marcos Y, Phelps BR and Bachman G. Community strategies that improve care and retention along the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV cascade: A review. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2012; 15(4). DOI: 10.7448/IAS.15.4.17394
  9. Satti H, Motsamai S, Chetane P, et al. Comprehensive approach to improving maternal health and achieving MDG 5: Report from the mountains of Lesotho. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042700
  10. Kok M, Dieleman M, Taegtmeyer M, et al. Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? Health Policy Plan. 2014: 121.
  11. Glenton C, Colvin CJ, Carlsen B, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: Qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414
  12. Schneider H, Okello D and Lehmann U. The global pendulum swing towards community health workers in low-and middle-income countries. Hum Resources Health. 2016; 14(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-016-0163-2
  13. Crigler L, Hill K, Furth R, et al. Community Health Worker Assessment and Improvement Matrix. Bethesda, MD: USAID Health Care Improvement Project; 2013.
  14. Amaya K, Alezuyo C, Bainomugisha B, et al. Community-based family planning best practices manual; 2011.
  15. Workman GM, Ribeiro RC, Rai SN, et al. Pediatric cancer knowledge: Assessment of knowledge of warning signs and symptoms for pediatric cancer among Brazilian community health workers. Journal of Cancer Education. 2007; 22(3): 181185. DOI: 10.1007/BF03174334
  16. Kalyango JN, Rutebemberwa E, Alfven T, et al. Performance of community health workers under integrated community case management of childhood illnesses in eastern Uganda. Malaria Journal. 2012; 11(1): 282. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-282
  17. Gaziano TA, Abrahams-Gessel S, Denman CA, et al. An assessment of community health workers’ ability to screen for cardiovascular disease risk with a simple, non-invasive risk assessment instrument in Bangladesh, Guatemala, Mexico, and South Africa: An observational study. The Lancet Global Health. 2015; 3(9): e556e563. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00143-6
  18. Abrahams-Gessel S. An examination of the ability of community health workers to effectively conduct community-based screening for cardiovascular disease in South Africa, Guatemala, and Mexico. Boston University; 2016.
  19. Bajpai N and Dholakia R. Improving the Performance of Accredited Social Health Activists in India: Working Paper No. 1. Mumbai: Columbia University; 2011.
  20. Ariff S, Soofi SB, Sadiq K, et al. Evaluation of health workforce competence in maternal and neonatal issues in public health sector of Pakistan: An assessment of their training needs. BMC Health Services Research. 2010; 10(1): 319. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-319
  21. Cusimano MD. Standard setting in medical education. Academic Medicine. 1996; 71(10): S112. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199610000-00062
  22. Bandaranayake RC. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37. Medical Teacher. 2008; 30(9–10): 836845. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802402247
  23. Cizek G and Bunch M. Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985918
  24. General Medical Council. Theme 5: Developing and implementing curricula and assessments. 2016; http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/27394.asp. Accessed April 25, 2016.
  25. Angoff W. Scales, norms and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike R, (ed.), Educational Measurement. 1971; 508600. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  26. Ebel RL. Procedures for the analysis of classroom tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 1954; 14: 352364. DOI: 10.1177/001316445401400215
  27. Fowell S, Fewtrell R and McLaughlin P. Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. Do discussion and iteration have an influence? Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2008; 13(1): 1124. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-006-9027-1
  28. Krippendorff K. Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability (1-25-2011). Pennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 2011.
  29. Wainer H and Thissen D. True score theory: The traditional method. In: Wainer H and Thissen D (eds.), Test Scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001.
  30. Roberts C, Newble D, Jolly B, et al. Assuring the quality of high-stakes undergraduate assessments of clinical competence. Medical teacher. 2006; 28(6): 535543. DOI: 10.1080/01421590600711187
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2369 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Nov 5, 2018
Published by: Levy Library Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Celia Taylor, Basimenye Nhlema, Emily Wroe, Moses Aron, Henry Makungwa, Elizabeth L Dunbar, published by Levy Library Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.