Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis Cover

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns.

#CDCGrandrounds#VitalSigns
Total number of original tweets in the corpus6,962*15,015
Time FrameAugust 18, 2011 to October 25, 2016March 19, 2013 to October 31, 2016
English tweets, n (%)6875 (98.75)13401 (89.25)
Number of unique users10555154
Tweets with 0 URL links (%)4695 (67.44)5019 (33.43)
Tweets with 1 URL links (%)2118 (30.42)8873 (59.09)
Tweets with 2 URL links (%)146 (2.10)1113 (7.41)
Tweets with 3 URL links (%)3 (0.04)10 (0.07)
Number of cycles in the sample5842
Number of original tweets per cycle, frequency
Range6–349151–1628
Median (Inter-quartile range)119 (75–157.5)256 (218.75–306.75)
Mean (standard deviation)119.5172 (74.17056)368.125 (322.4237)

[i] *We excluded 4 #CDCGrandRounds tweets that were posted on April 21, 2011. These 4 tweets were not included in any of the cycles of the #CDCGrandRounds corpus. For the frequency of the cycles of #VitalSigns, we excluded Cycle 1 and Cycle 42 here.

Table 2

Top 10 users (Twitter handles) and top 10 URL domains in the corpora of #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns respectively.

#CDCGrandRoundsN = 6,962 tweets#VitalSignsN = 15,015 tweets
Twitter handleFrequency (%)Twitter handleFrequency (%)
@CDCgov1381 (19.8)@RedneckJournal759 (5.05)
@CDC_eHealth882 (12.7)@Pirate_Journal467 (3.11)
@CDCInjury349 (5.0)@CDCgov389 (2.59)
@CDCChronic212 (3.0)@CommFdnsCanada260 (1.73)
@MillionHeartsUS211 (3.0)@DrFriedenCDC245 (1.63)
@CDC_Cancer138 (2.0)@LdnCommFdn203 (1.35)
@DrFriedenCDC136 (2.0)@HamCommFdn113 (0.75)
@CDCSTD135 (1.9)@CDC_eHealth112 (0.75)
@CDC_NCBDDD126 (1.8)@GoldenComFdn109 (0.73)
@CDC_HIVAIDS102 (1.5)@Oxehealth90 (0.60)
#CDCGrandRoundsN = 2,419 URL links#VitalSignsN = 11,129 URL links
URL domainFrequency (%)URL domainFrequency (%)
www.cdc.gov1424 (58.87)Twitter.com2670 (23.99)
Twitter.com398 (16.45)www.cdc.gov2058 (18.49)
www.youtube.com160 (6.61)www.redneckjournal.com658 (5.91)
Storify.com34 (1.41)www.piratejournal.com467 (4.20)
www.onlinevideoservice.com25 (1.03)www.instagram.com416 (3.74)
Wm.onlinevideoservice.com21 (0.87)www.youtube.com319 (2.87)
Paper.li18 (0.74)www.vitalsignscanada.ca157 (1.41)
www.facebook.com12 (0.50)www.facebook.com133 (1.20)
Millionhearts.hhs.gov10 (0.41)www.whizart.com130 (1.17)
www.hhs.gov9 (0.37)Soundcloud.com102 (0.92)
URL links not resolved54 (2.23)URL links not resolved406 (3.65)
Table 3

Prevalence ratio of retweet frequency in the corpora of #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns tweets for predictor variables in univariable and multivariable negative binomial regression models.

Univariable regressionMultivariable regression
Prevalence ratio (95% CI)P-valuePrevalence ratio (95% CI)P-value
#CDCGrandRounds
Hashtag count0.8208 (0.7790, 0.8657)<0.0011.0784 (1.0302, 1.1292)<0.001
Mention count0.6673 (0.6271, 0.7105)<0.0010.8613 (0.8152, 0.9100)<0.001
URL link count1.7273 (1.6045, 1.8608)<0.0011.7773 (1.6729, 1.8890)<0.001
Log(follower count)*1.3876 (1.3709, 1.4045)<0.0011.4332 (1.4111, 1.4557)<0.001
Log(friend count)*0.7996 (0.7711, 0.8296)<0.0010.9082 (0.8755, 0.9422)<0.001
Log(status count)*1.5522 (1.4939, 1.6130)<0.0010.8538 (0.8213, 0.8878)<0.001
Log(favorite count)*0.9424 (0.9214, 0.9637)<0.0011.0805 (1.0579, 1.1035)<0.001
#VitalSigns
Hashtag count0.6866 (0.6654, 0.7085)<0.0010.9688 (0.9472, 0.9908)0.005
Mention count0.7411 (0.7114, 0.7726)<0.0011.1748 (1.1404, 1.2104)<0.001
URL link count3.7244 (3.4586, 4.0113)<0.0011.2155 (1.1587, 1.2752)<0.001
Log(follower count)*1.7855 (1.7642, 1.8073)<0.0012.0256 (1.9957, 2.0563)<0.001
Log(friend count)*0.8634 (0.8309, 0.8975)<0.0010.8583 (0.8376, 0.8795)<0.001
Log(status count)*1.1712 (1.1324, 1.2106)<0.0010.6579 (0.6441, 0.6719)<0.001
Log(favorite count)*1.1475 (1.1188, 1.1766)<0.0011.1205 (1.1043, 1.1370)<0.001

[i] *To perform the logarithmic transformation, the frequency of follower count, friend counts, status count and favorite count were added 0.5 respectively to avoid the situation of having log(0). CI, confidence interval.

Figure 1

Prevalence ratio (PR, with 95% confidence intervals) of the effect of attaching a photo or video on retweet count for #VitalSigns over different cycles.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2381 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Nov 5, 2018
Published by: Levy Library Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Ashley M. Jackson, Lindsay A. Mullican, Jingjing Yin, Zion Tsz Ho Tse, Hai Liang, King-Wa Fu, Jennifer O. Ahweyevu, Jimmy J. Jenkins III, Nitin Saroha, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung, published by Levy Library Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.