Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From Print form to Digital Communication: the One-way Journey of Academic Research Cover

From Print form to Digital Communication: the One-way Journey of Academic Research

By: Rosa Lorés  
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/.
  2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475–509. doi: 10.1177/0741088393010004001.
  3. Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004.
  4. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis. In S. Barab, R. Kling, J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016.
  5. Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet [online]. http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
  6. Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent. In D. Tannen, A. M. Tester (Eds.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 1–25). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  7. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/.
  8. Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York: Routledge.
  9. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluation in Texts: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
  11. InterGedi. Retrieved from www.intergedi.unizar.es.
  12. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/swll.5.
  13. iWeb corpus. Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/iweb/help/iweb_overview.pdf
  14. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
  15. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203619728.
  16. Lorés, R. (2020). Science on the web: The exploration of European research websites of energy-related projects as digital genres for the promotion of value. Discourse, Context & Media, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100389.
  17. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2018). Online conference announcements as spaces for disciplinary communication. English Text Construction, 11(2), 256–284. doi: 10.1075/etc.00011.lor.
  18. Lorés-Sanz, R., & Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2020). New concepts, different approaches: Tackling e-visibility in research project websites. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 15, 83–98.
  19. Miller, C. (2014). Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later. Letras & Letras, 31(3), 56–72.
  20. Pascual, D., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lorés, R. (2020). Looking into international research groups’ digital discursive practices: Criteria and methodological steps in the compilation of the EUROPRO digital corpus. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 87–102. doi: 10.32714/ricl.08.02.05.
  21. Petroni, S. (2011). Language in the Multimodal Web Domain. Roma: Aracne Editrice.
  22. Preacher, K. J. (2001). Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org. Accessed 20 December 2019.
  23. Räisänen, C. (1999). The Conference Forum as a System of Genres. Gothenberg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  24. Sancho-Guinda, C. (2015). Genres on the move: Currency and erosion of the genre moves construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 73–87. doi: 10.1016/j. jeap.2015.07.001.
  25. Tannen, D., & Trester, A. M. (Eds.) (2013). Discourse 2.0.: Language and New Media. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  26. The Linguist List. Retrived from http://www.linguistlist.org/.
  27. Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.) (2014). Evaluation in Context. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  28. Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (Eds.) (2011). Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: O.U.P.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36145/DoC2021.04 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0402
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 63
Published on: Nov 20, 2022
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Rosa Lorés, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.