Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
SOSAS Study in Rural India: Using Accredited Social Health Activists as Enumerators Cover

SOSAS Study in Rural India: Using Accredited Social Health Activists as Enumerators

Open Access
|Mar 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Location of Panchkula District and Nanakpur’s three subcenters. Clusters interviewed in each subcenter are listed, as well as the number of households surveyed.

Figure 2

Hierarchy of health care facilities in rural India. The interaction between villages, private and public health care facilities, and ASHAs is indicated, along with the number of individuals served at each level of care [27].

Table 1

Demographic data for surveyed individuals based on current surgical need.

CharacteristicTotal population N = 93No current need N = 28Current need N = 65p-value*
N (%)
Age (years)35 (26, 50)33 (25, 49)46.5 (31, 60)0.034§
SexFemale80 (86.0)58 (89.2)22 (78.6)0.174
EducationNone35 (37.6)22 (33.8)13 (46.4)0.251
Some58 (62.4)43 (66.1)15 (53.6)
LiteracyYes55 (59.1)40 (61.5)15 (53.6)0.473
OccupationUnemployed/Homemaker71 (76.3)51 (78.5)20 (71.4)0.464
Employed outside22 (23.7)14 (21.5)8 (28.6)

[i] * Current need vs. no current need using Pearson’s chi-squared test.

Median (IQR).

§ Kruskal-Wallis test.

Table 2

Anatomic location of conditions with current surgical need.

Anatomic locationN (%)
Face, head, neck2 (7)
Chest1 (4)
Back1 (4)
Abdomen3 (11)
Groin4 (14)
Extremities17 (60)
TOTAL28 (100)
Table 3

Predictors for accessing surgical care by facility level and current surgical need.

Facility levelAccess variableNo current needCurrent needp-value*
N (%)
PrimaryTransport typeOn foot/carried7 (11.3)2 (8.0)0.313
Personal21 (33.9)4 (16.0)
Public22 (35.5)13 (52.0)
Don’t go12 (19.4)6 (24.0)
Travel time (min)30 (15, 60)30 (15, 60)0.873§
Transport wait time (min)0 (0, 15)0 (0, 15)0.966§
Cost (Indian rupee)0 (0, 10)10 (0, 10)0.182§
Availability ofYes/NA34 (85.0)14 (77.8)0.501
transport moneyNo6 (15.0)4 (22.2)
SecondaryTransport typeOn foot/carried0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0.284
Personal18 (30.0)4 (16.0)
Public30 (50.0)17 (68.0)
Don’t go12 (20.0)4 (16.0)
Travel time (min)30 (30, 60)60 (30, 60)0.0495§
Transport wait time (min)15 (0, 30)15 (0, 30)0.929§
Cost (Indian rupee)20 (0, 25)20 (20, 20)0.730§
Availability ofYes/NA29 (78.4)14 (77.8)0.960
transport moneyNo8 (21.6)4 (22.2)
TertiaryTransport typeOn foot/carried2 (3.2)0 (0.0)0.225
Personal20 (31.8)4 (15.4)
Public18 (28.6)12 (46.2)
Don’t go23 (36.5)10 (38.5)
Travel time (min)60 (45, 60)90 (60, 150)0.0626§
Transport wait time (min)5 (0, 30)12.5 (0, 45)0.742§
Cost (Indian rupee)10 (0, 35)30 (0, 35)0.305§
Availability ofYes/NA29 (85.3)13 (92.9)0.471
transport moneyNo5 (14.7)1 (7.1)

[i] * Current need vs. no current need using Pearson’s chi-squared test.

Median (IQR).

§ Kruskal-Wallis test.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2340 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Mar 14, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Srivarshini Cherukupalli, Manisha B. Bhatia, Marissa A. Boeck, Kevin J. Blair, Neeraja Nagarajan, Shailvi Gupta, Leah C. Tatebe, Sristi Sharma, Ashish Bhalla, Benedict C. Nwomeh, Mamta Swaroop, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.