Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bridging the Gap: Including Patient Voices in Short-Term Medical Mission Evaluations Cover

Bridging the Gap: Including Patient Voices in Short-Term Medical Mission Evaluations

Open Access
|Jun 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Cross-sectional Survey Administered in the Dominican Republic.

Table 1

Patient Demographics.*

Number (%)
MaleFemaleTotal
37 (32%)80 (68%)117 (100%)
Age
      18–240 (0%)4 (3%)4 (3%)
      25–443 (2%)15 (13%)18 (15%)
      45–6416 (14%)31 (26%)47 (40%)
      65+18 (15%)30 (26%)48 (41%)
Patient Status
      New Patient2 (2%)20 (17%)22 (19%)
      Returning Patient35 (30%)60 (51%)95 (81%)
Education Level
      None6 (5%)12 (10%)18 (15%)
      Primary (1–6)16 (14%)30 (26%)46 (40%)
      Intermediate (7–8)6 (5%)11 (9%)17 (14%)
      High (9–12)6 (5%)16 (14%)22 (19%)
      Some College2 (2%)7 (6%)9 (8%)
      College Degree0 (0%)2 (2%)2 (2%)
      Graduate Degree1 (1%)2 (2%)3 (3%)

[i] * Percentages represented out of N = 117.

Figure 2

Perceived Efficiency of Clinic Wait Time.

Table 2

Perceived Efficiency of Clinic Wait Time.*

Wait time perceptionsFrequency (%)
LongerAs ExpectedShorter
Age
      18–244 (3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
      25–4410 (9%)5 (4%)3 (3%)
      45–6416 (14%)20 (17%)11 (9%)
      65+18 (15%)19 (16%)11 (9%)
      Total48 (41%)44 (38%)25 (21%)
Patient status
      New patient10 (9%)4 (3%)8 (7%)
      Returning patient38 (32%)40 (34%)17 (15%)
Longer than expected station wait time?YesNo
42 (36%)75 (64%)
Which station took longer?TriageConsultorioPharmacy
19 (16%)22 (19%)3 (3%)

[i] * Percentages represented out of N = 117.

Table 3

Survey Responses Regarding Provider Communication.*

Frequency (%)
Did your physician take the time to listen to you?Strongly DisagreeDisagreeDisagree More or LessAgreeStrongly Agree
1 (1%)1 (1%)2 (2%)41 (35%)72 (62%)
How well did you understand your doctor/interpreter?Very wellSo soNot very well
      No Education17 (15%)1 (1%)0 (0%)
      Primary43 (38%)3 (3%)0 (0%)
      Intermediate15 (13%)2 (2%)0 (0%)
      High School20 (17%)2 (2%)0 (0%)
      Some College9 (8%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
      College Degree2 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
      Graduate Degree3 (3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Total109 (93%)8 (7%)0 (0%)
Were there any issues that the doctor/team did not address todayYesNo
9 (8%)108 (92%)

[i] * Percentages represented out of N = 117.

Figure 3

Responses to survey question “What do you value most about this clinic?”*

* Numbers add to more than 117 because respondents were able to choose more than one option.

Table 4

Survey Responses Regarding Quality and Community Impact.*

Frequency (%)
How does this clinic compare to your regular doctor’s office?BetterSameWorse
82 (70%)34 (29%)1 (1%)
Have you deferred local care waiting for this clinic?YesNo
57 (49%)60 (51%)

[i] * Percentages represented out of N = 117.

Figure 4

Representation of Medication Quiz Scores within Age Groups.

Table 5

Survey Responses Regarding Meeting Patient Needs: Following Instructions and Medication Quiz Score (stratified by age, education, and patient status).*

Frequency (%)
How many of the instructions given to you can you follow?AllMostNone
88 (75%)28 (24%)1 (1%)
Average medication quiz score
18–2424–4445–6465+All
Average score based on age100%88.42%95.08%79.48%91%
# of respondents in each age group scoring 100%4 (3%)14 (12%)39 (33%)29 (25%)86 (74%)
Average score based on education levelNo EducationPrimaryIntermediateHigh SchoolSome CollegeCollege DegreeGraduate Degree
90%90%86%92%98%100%100%
Average Score Based on Patient StatusNew PatientReturning Patient
82.28%92.82%

[i] * Percentages represented out of N = 117.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2431 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Jun 18, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Diana Morales, Wendy Clay, Rebecca Khamishon, Rachel Zaragoza, Reem Eldnaf, Alison Trautman Nagy, Michael Ong, Jiro Morales, Mark Ryan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.