Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Personalized E-Coaching in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Cover

Personalized E-Coaching in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open Access
|Jul 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

CONSORT flow diagram for the HAPPY London study.

Table 1

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics for both groups.

Clinical ValuesE-coaching group (n = 205)SOC group (n = 197)P value
Age (years)65.1(6.3)65.9(4.8)0.15
Male sex, no. (%)127(62.0)126(64.0)0.75
University education, no. (%)109(53)97(49)0.42
Smoking history, no. (%)
    Non-smoker104(50.7)80(40.6)0.053
    Ex-smoker86(42.0)101(51.3)0.08
    Light (<10 cigarettes/day)9(4.4)9(4.6)1
    Moderate (11–19)6(2.9)3(1.5)0.53
    Heavy (>20)04(2.0)0.12
Ethnicity, no. (%)
    White182(88.8)172(87.3)0.76§
    Asian20(9.8)14(7.1)0.76§
    Black Afro-Caribbean1(0.5)5(2.5)0.76§
    Other2(1.0)6(3.0)0.76§
Medical History
Rheumatoid Arthritis, no. (%)8(3.9)3(1.5)0.25
BP medication, no. (%)105(51.2)83(42.1)0.08
Cholesterol medication, no. (%)98(47.8)84(42.6)0.40
Diabetes, no. (%)35(17.1)22(11.2)0.12
Atrial fibrillation, no. (%)9(4.4)11(5.6)0.75
Family History CAD, no. (%)75(36.6)60(31)0.25
Risk Scores
QRISK2*, 10-year risk, %16.5(12.7; 23.1)16.5(12.6; 21.1)0.56
Framingham risk score, 10-year risk, %16(9)17.8(10)0.54
Risk Stratification
High risk, no. (%)73(36)62(31)0.38
QRISK2 for high risk*, 10-year risk, %25.7(22.2; 31.2)26.3(21.8; 31.2)0.99
Mod risk (n)132(64)135(69)0.38
QRISK2 for mod*, 10-year risk, %13.9(11.8; 16.2)13.7(11.6; 16.7)0.95
High risk or diabetes, no. (%)79(39)67(34)0.4
Systolic BP, mmHg132.5(13.3)132.3(14.8)0.88
Diastolic BP, mmHg79.2(9.2)80(8.6)0.34
Weight, Kg80.7(18.4)79.7(16)0.56
BMI, Kg/m228.1(5.6)27.4(4.4)0.16
Hip circumference, cm104.7(10.3)103.6(8.2)0.25
Waist circumference, cm95.8(15.2)95.4(12)0.81
Total Cholesterol, mmol/L4.9(1.1)5.1(1.1)0.09
HDL, mmol/L1.6(0.5)1.6(0.4)0.95
LDL, mmol/L2.8(1)2.9(1)0.10
Triglyceride*, mmol/L1.1(0.8; 1.5)1.3(0.8; 1.5)0.31
Glucose*, mmol/L5.5(5.1; 6.0)5.5(5.1; 5.9)0.71
hsCRP*, mg/L1.2(0.7; 2.5)1.3(0.7; 2.4)0.76
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 sqm82.9(20.1)81.9(17.9)0.58
Physical activity, minutes per day70.8(75.6)64.9(91.9)0.48
Lifestyle score, out of 10, 10 being best score6.9(1.3)6.8(1.3)0.22
Surrogate Markers
PWV, m/s8.5(1.7)8.9(1.6)0.027*
CIMT (combined right and left), mm0.705(0.13)0.736(0.13)0.02*
Quality of Life
Self-rated health state*, best health score 10080(65–90)80(65–90)0.21
EQ-5D-3L VAS value*, best quality of life score 1)0.76(0.73; 01.0)0.76(0.69; 1.0)0.39

[i] Results presented as mean (SD) or *median (interquartile range), unless stated otherwise.

§ white vs. non-white.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; PWV, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EQ-5D-3L VAS, Euroqol, 5 dimension, 3 level visual analogue scale – validated questionnaire; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; IQR, inter quartile range; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Mod, moderate; pd, per day; QOL, quality of life.

Figure 2

Change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity over six months.

Table 2

Comparison of change over six months between intervention group and SOC group.

Clinical ValuesE-coaching group n = 194SOC group n = 183Mean difference between groups over six months (95% CI)p-value
Follow-upMean change over 6 monthsFollow-upMean change over 6 months
Primary Endpoint
PWV,8.3 (1.4)–0.168.6 (1.7)–0.250.09 (–0.39; 0.22)0.56
Secondary Endpoints
Systolic BP, mmHg129.5 (13.6)–3.18130.7 (14.7)–1.688–1.5 (–4.2; 1.2)0.27
Diastolic BP, mmHg76.7 (9.1)–2.3778 (8.7)–2.076–0.29 (–1.6; 1.1)0.67
Weight, kg78.9 (18.1)–1.2279 (15.8)–0.763–0.45 (–1.0; 0.1)0.10
BMI, kg/m227.4 (5.3)–0.4227.1 (4.4)–0.247–0.17 (–0.4; 0)0.07
Hip circumference, cm102.2 (9.9)–2.19101.8 (8.2)–1.809–0.38 (–1.2; 0.5)0.37
Waist circumference, cm92.7 (14.7)–2.5593.4 (12)–2.048–0.5 (–1.5; 0.5)0.31
Total Cholesterol, mmol/L4.8 (1)–0.164.9 (1)–0.1970.04 (–0.1; 0.2)0.60
HDL, mmol/L1.6 (0.5)–0.031.6 (0.4)–0.017–0.01 (–0.1; 0)0.64
LDL, mmol/L2.6 (0.9)–0.102.8 (0.9)–0.1420.04 (–0.1; 0.2)0.56
Triglyceride, mmol/L1.2 (0.8)–0.081.2 (0.6)–0.1130.03 (–0.1; 0.1)0.56
Glucose, mmol/L5.6 (1.3)–0.295.5 (1.1)–0.266–0.03 (–0.2; 0.2)0.77
HsCRP, mg/L2.3 (5.9)–0.262.2 (5.4)0.004–0.27 (–1.9; 1.3)0.75
eGFR, mL/min/1.73sqm)82.3 (17)–0.6483 (20.2)1.225–1.87 (–4.8; 1.1)0.22
Alcohol per week, units7.9 (9.4)–0.787.7 (8.2)–1.0810.3 (–0.7; 1.3)0.54
Physical activity, minutes per day98 (145.5)25.1074.2 (100.3)8.44816.65 (–10.3; 43.6)0.23
Lifestyle score, best score 107.7 (1.2)0.747.5 (1.3)0.6590.08 (–0.1; 0.3)0.45
CIMT (left and right), mm0.72 (0.14)0.0140.75 (0.13)0.0150.02 (–0.017; 0.015)0.91
QRISK2 score, 10-year risk, %19.2 (8.5)0.1418.9 (8.6)0.010.24 (–0.4; 0.6)0.63
Expected QRISK2 at 6 months#, 10-year risk, %19.6 (8.1)19.3 (8.8)
Framingham risk score, 10-year risk, %16.1 (8.9)–1.2316.6 (9.5)–1.370.14 (–0.9; 1.2)0.79
Self-rated health state (best health 100)*85 (75; 90)4.8184 (69; 90)5.58–0.77 (–6.5; 4.9)0.79
EQ-5D-3L VAS value (best value 1)*0.76 (0.7; 1.0)–0.000.76 (0.70; 1.0)0.01–0.01 (–0.02; 0.05)0.44
Total logins to study Website, n12.89.1<0.001

[i] Results presented as mean (SD) or *median (interquartile range), unless stated otherwise.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EQ-5D-3L VAS, Euroqol, 5 dimension, 3 level visual analogue scale – validated questionnaire; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; IQR, inter quartile range; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Mod, moderate; n, number; PWV, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; QOL, quality of life.

# Naturally expected due to older age only if other factors unchanged. QRISK increases with increasing age.

Corrected when extreme outlier excluded (a single reading of 27 m/s which was very different to a subsequent visit for the same patient and compared to all other readings).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2496 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Jul 12, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Mohammed Y. Khanji, Armida Balawon, Redha Boubertakh, Leonard Hofstra, Jagat Narula, Myriam Hunink, Francesca Pugliese, Steffen E. Petersen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.