Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Ocean Pollution – A Complex Mixture.

Figure 2

Areas considered suitable for Vibrio cholerae [50].

Source: Escobar et al., (2015) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.028) CC BY 4.0.

Figure 3

Total global mercury releases and relevant historical factors, 1510–2010.

Source: Street et al., (2019) (https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab281f) CC BY 3.0.

Figure 4

Geographic differences in methylmercury concentrations of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares).

Source: Reprinted from Nicklish et al., Mercury levels of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) are associated with capture location. Environmental Pollution 2017: 87–93, doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.070 with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 5

Cumulative Plastic Production since 1960. Calculated as the sum of annual global polymer resin, synthetic fiber, and plastic additive production. Most of this plastic still exists.

Source: Our World in Data (https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution), CC BY 4.0).

Figure 6

Global Chemical Production and Capacity Index (%) 1987–2020.

Source: The pH Report, American Chemistry Council.

Figure 7

Impact of geographic variation on risk-based fish consumption advisories. Ranges of risk-based consumption limits for 11 sites, calculated in meals per month and based on multiple contaminant exposure with cancerogenic health endpoints, including total PCBs (n = 209), toxaphene and dieldrin. The red hollow spheres to the left of each box plot display the individual fish values. Letters in parenthesis represent subgroups of the sample population with means that were significantly different from each other using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Heart Association (AHA) recommended minimum monthly fish consumption levels and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) threshold for unrestricted (>16) fish meals per month are shown as dashed lines. Note: GOM, Gulf of Mexico, IO, Indian Ocean; NCS, North China Sea; NEAO, Northeast Atlantic Ocean; NEPO, Northeast Pacific Ocean; NPO, Northern Pacific Ocean; NWAO, Northwest Atlantic Ocean; NWPO, Northwest Pacific Ocean; SCS, South China Sea; SEPO, Southeast Pacific Ocean; SWPO, Southwest Pacific Ocean.

Source: Nicklisch et al. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP518.

Table 1

Major Oil Spills [299].

SpillYearDescription
VLCC Metula Oil Spill, Chile1974A very large crude carrier hit a shoal in the Straits of Magellan and released nearly 200,000 tons of light Arabian crude oil.
Amoco Cadiz Oil Spill, France1978A very large crude carrier clipped shallow rocks off the coast of Brittany. The resulting oil slick polluted 200 miles of the French coast and significantly harmed wildlife (mollusks, crustaceans, birds).
Atlantic Empress Oil Spill, Trinidad1979Occurred 10 miles off the coast of Trinidad and Tobago. An estimated 90 million gallons of oil were released into the Atlantic Ocean.
Ixtoc Oil Spill, Mexico1979Spill occurred as a result of an explosion. 140 million gallons of oil were released into the Gulf of Mexico.
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Alaska, USA1989Released 37,000 metric tons of crude oil into Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA. Considered the worst oil spill worldwide in terms of environmental damage.
Persian Gulf War Oil Spill1991Between 252 and 336 million gallons of oil were released into the Persian Gulf during the Gulf War.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Texas, USA2010134 million gallons of crude oil were released into the Gulf of Mexico following an explosion and fire on a drilling platform.
Guarello Island, Patagonia, Chile201940,000 liters of diesel fuel released into the Straits of Magellan from a mining operation.
Figure 8

Major Oil Spills, 1967–2010. From: World Ocean Review 3, maribus gGmbH, Hamburg 2015.

Source: Bücker et al. 2014 [314]. See also ITOPF 2019 [315].

Figure 9

Frequency of Bottom-Water Hypoxia (‘Dead Zones’), Gulf of Mexico, 1985–2014.

Source: Rabalais et al., 2019, CC BY 4.0 [327].

Figure 10

Geographical Distribution of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Events, 1970 and 2017.

Source: US National Office for HABs, Woods Hole, MA.

Figure 11

Trends in conditions favorable to Vibrio outbreaks in selected world regions [411].

Source: Reprinted from Watts et al. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. Lancet 392: 2479–2514, 2018, with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 12

Sea surface temperature and relative risk of clinically notified cases of Vibrio infection, Sweden, 2006–2014 [416].

Source: Semenza et al. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2198.

Figure 13

Seasonal abundance of Vibrio species, Neuse River Estuary, NC, USA, 2003–2017. (Autoregressive integrated moving average of mean monthly abundance at a mid-water station). Dots are actual measurements. Red line represents model abundance. Blue lines are 95% confidence intervals.

Source: Froelich et al. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215254, Creative Commons, license CC BY 4.0.

Table 2

Optimal Temperature and Salinity Fecal-Oral Pathogens in Sea-Water [445].

PathogenRelated DiseasesSalinity (ppt)Temp (°C)Notes
Vibrio sppVibriosis5–2515–30Vibrio species naturally thrive in warm waters with moderate salinity
Campylobacter jejuni Campylobacteriosis0–0.530–45
Shigella Shigellosis0–204–37Frequent outbreaks in US
E coli O157:H7Bloody diarrhea0–344–37Frequent outbreaks in US
Legionella spLegionnaire’s Disease0–0.525–47High incidence in US
Typically found in freshwater, but can also survive in marine environments

Source: CF MacKay, Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

Figure 14

Global changes in maximum fish catch potential.

Source: IPCC.

Table 3

European Ocean Monitoring Programs.

  • Data from the European Space Agency Copernicus Sentinel-3 satellite Ocean and Land Color Instruments (OLCI) are used in near real-time to make initial water quality assessments and quickly alert managers to potential problems and emerging threats related to cyanobacteria [544].

  • The IOC International Oceanographic Data Exchange Programme (IODE) hosts the Harmful Algae Event Data Base (HAEDAT) containing and summarizing complex quality-controlled, regularly updated information on HAB events worldwide. These curated open access databases are the base of the Global HAB Status report supported by IOC-UNESCO, ICES, PICES and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [323].

  • The International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) facilitates rapid information exchange across borders during events that threaten food safety [545].

  • The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed allows rapid information sharing to protect food supplies and document foodborne outbreaks across Europe [546].

Table 4

United States Ocean Monitoring Programs.

  • CDC created the One Health HABs System (OHHABS) in 2016 to allow US states to report on both human and animal HAB-related illness and information about the blooms themselves [547]. Data collected through OHHABS will enable updating of case definitions for HAB-related illness, treatment regimens, and clinical analyses.

  • The CDC’s Environmental Public Health Tracking Program [547] is collaborating with OHHABS to geographically track HAB events and link these events to illness cases and outbreaks.

  • CDC is working with the American Association of Poison Centers to identify outbreaks of HAB-related disease using the National Poison Data System, which records data from every call made to U.S. poison centers. An algorithm identifies potential outbreaks [548].

  • EPA created the Cyanobacteria Assessment Network (CyAN) to support the management and use of U.S. lakes and reservoirs [549].

  • The Food and Drug Administration has established the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) program [550]. Elements of this programs are: 1) classification of areas for safe shellfish harvesting; 2) water quality monitoring; 3) marine biotoxin management; 4) monitoring of procedures for processing, shipping, and handling of live shellfish; 5) establishment of laboratory methods for monitoring microbiological contaminants and marine biotoxins; and 6) enforcement of shellfish safety regulations. These programs have been effective in minimizing human illnesses from consumption of toxic shellfish while allowing fisheries industries to persist in regions threatened by recurrent HABs.

Figure 15

Concentrations of PCBs in archived herring gull eggs from three locations on the North German coast, 1988–2008 [208]

Source: Fleidner et al. (2012), https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-7, Creative Commons, license CC BY 2.0.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2831 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Dec 3, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Philip J. Landrigan, John J. Stegeman, Lora E. Fleming, Denis Allemand, Donald M. Anderson, Lorraine C. Backer, Françoise Brucker-Davis, Nicolas Chevalier, Lilian Corra, Dorota Czerucka, Marie-Yasmine Dechraoui Bottein, Barbara Demeneix, Michael Depledge, Dimitri D. Deheyn, Charles J. Dorman, Patrick Fénichel, Samantha Fisher, Françoise Gaill, François Galgani, William H. Gaze, Laura Giuliano, Philippe Grandjean, Mark E. Hahn, Amro Hamdoun, Philipp Hess, Bret Judson, Amalia Laborde, Jacqueline McGlade, Jenna Mu, Adetoun Mustapha, Maria Neira, Rachel T. Noble, Maria Luiza Pedrotti, Christopher Reddy, Joacim Rocklöv, Ursula M. Scharler, Hariharan Shanmugam, Gabriella Taghian, Jeroen A. J. M. van de Water, Luigi Vezzulli, Pál Weihe, Ariana Zeka, Hervé Raps, Patrick Rampal, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.