Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Farmers in South Africa: Mixed-Method Assessment Cover

Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Farmers in South Africa: Mixed-Method Assessment

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Algorithm used in current program.

Table 1

Loss To Attrition.

T1T2T3
N = 403N = 114N = 403
Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)
   Yes403 (100%)13 (11%)87 (21.6%)
      VIA Positive124 (30.8%)4 (3.5%)7 (8.0%)
           Cryotherapy114 (92%)
      VIA Negative279 (69.2%)9 (7.9%)80 (92%)
      Ineligible0 (0%)1 (0.9%)
   No0 (0%)33 (29%)79 (19.6%)
  Loss to Follow-Up68 (60%)237 (58.8%)
Pap Smear
   Yes183 (45.4%)30 (26.3%)96 (23.8%)
      Pap Positive49 (12.2%)11 (36.7%)14 (14.6%)
      Pap Negative134 (33.3%)19 (63.3%)77 (80.0%)
   No199 (49.4%)21 (18.4%)57 (14.1%)
   Loss to Follow-Up21 (5.2%)63 (55.3%)248 (61.5%)

[i] * VIA is the abbreviation for Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid.

Time 1 (T1) is program implementation, Time 2 (T2) is 6 month follow-up for those who received cryotherapy at T1, Time 3 (T3) is 1-year follow-up for all those who were screened at T1.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.37 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Apr 15, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Molly Lieber, Omara Afzal, Kathryn Shaia, Adrienne Mandelberger, Christine Du Preez, Ann Marie Beddoe, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.