Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Decolonizing Global Health Research: Perspectives from US and International Global Health Trainees Cover

Decolonizing Global Health Research: Perspectives from US and International Global Health Trainees

Open Access
|Feb 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of Respondents (n = 61).

CHARACTERISTICALL (N = 61)HIC (N = 36)LMIC (N = 25)P VALUE
Gender±
    Female35 (58.3%)¥27 (75.0%)8 (33.3%)0.001a
    Male25 (41.7%)¥9 (25.0%)16 (66.7%)
Training Stage
    Post-doctoral45 (73.8%)28 (77.8%)17 (68.0%)0.393a
    Pre-doctoral16 (26.2%)8 (22.2%)8 (32.0%)
Degree Status at Time of UJMT Program
    Already had MD28 (45.9%)15 (41.7%)13 (52.0%)0.095b
    Already had PhD9 (14.6%)4 (11.1%)5 (20.0%)
    Pursuing MD7 (11.5%)7 (19.4%)0 (0.0%)
    Pursuing PhD17 (27.9%)10 (27.8%)7 (28.0%)
Area of Study at time of UJMT Program
    Basic Science12 (19.7%)10 (27.8%)2 (8.0%)0.099b
    Secondary Data Analysis13 (21.3%)9 (25.0%)4 (16.0%)0.399a
    Clinical Trial11 (18.0%)8 (22.2%)3 (12.0%)0.500b
    Public Health/Health Education30 (49.2%)19 (52.8%)11 (44.0%)0.500a
    Implementation Science11 (18.3%)2 (5.6%)9 (36.0%)0.005b
Prior Experiences in Global Health Training
    Never13 (21.3%)2 (5.6%)11 (44.0%)<0.001b
    1–226 (42.6%)17 (47.2%)9 (36.0%)
    3–514 (23.0%)13 (36.1%)1 (4.0%)
    More than 58 (13.1%)4 (11.1%)4 (16.0%)

[i] ± Total n in this row equals 60 – one participant did not answer about gender.

a Chi-square test.

b Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2

Participants’ Self-reported Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Decolonizing Global Health.

ITEMALL
(N = 61)
HIC
(N = 36)
LMIC
(N = 25)
P VALUE
Overall Knowledge of Decolonization of Global Health
    Never heard of it5 (8.2%)0 (0.0%)5 (20.0%)0.019b
    Know a little45 (73.8%)29 (80.6%)16 (64.0%)
    Know a lot11 (18.0%)7 (19.4%)4 (16.0%)
“I am supportive of the current movement toward decolonization of global health.”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1.000b
    Neutral4 (6.6%)2 (5.6%)2 (8.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree57 (93.4%)34 (94.4%)23 (92.0%)
“I am worried that the current movement toward decolonization of global health will do more harm than good.”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree45 (73.8%)26 (72.2%)19 (76.0%)0.274b
    Neutral9 (14.8%)4 (11.1%)5 (20.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree7 (11.5%)6 (16.7%)1 (4.0%)
“I feel excited because decolonization will give more opportunities for people in LMICs to succeed in global health research.”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0.430b
    Neutral7 (11.5%)3 (8.3%)4 (16.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree54 (88.5%)33 (91.7%)21 (84.0%)
“I feel defensive like I am being accused of doing something wrong.”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree46 (75.4%)29 (80.6%)17 (68.0%)0.126b
    Neutral13 (21.3%)5 (13.9%)8 (32.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree2 (3.3%)2 (5.6%)0 (0.0%)
“I feel hopeful that decolonization will actually reduce global health inequalities”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree2 (3.3%)2 (5.6%)0 (0.0%)0.106b
    Neutral14 (23.0%)11 (30.6%)3 (12.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree45 (73.8%)23 (63.9%)22 (88.0%)
“I feel guilty because I personally benefitted from colonialism.”
    Strongly Disagree/Disagree29 (47.5%)12 (33.3%)17 (68.0%)0.001a
    Neutral16 (26.2%)9 (25.0%)7 (28.0%)
    Agree/Strongly Agree16 (26.2%)15 (41.7%)1 (4.0%)

[i] a Chi-square test.

b Fisher’s exact test.

Table 3

Main categories of responses in defining what decolonizing means.

LMIC RESPONDENTS
(N = 20)
HIC RESPONDENTS
(N = 33)
TOTAL
Actively eliminating power imbalances7 (35%)14 (42%)21
Prioritizing local needs4 (20%)7 (21%)11
Promoting local leadership5 (25%)5 (15%)10
Providing equitable opportunities for all3 (15%)6 (18%)9
Ensuring programs are culturally appropriate1 (5%)1 (3%)2
Table 4

Perceptions of the Impact of Historical Colonialism on Aspects of Global Health.

WHAT DO YOU THINK THE IMPACT OF COLONIALISM HAS BEEN ON…All
(N = 61)
HIC
(N = 36)
LMIC
(N = 25)
P VALUE
….the total amount of funding available for global health today
    Negative23 (37.7%)12 (33.3%)11 (44.0%)0.602a
    Neutral13 (21.3%)9 (25.0%)4 (16.0%)
    Positive25 (41.0%)15 (41.7%)10 (40.0%)
…which research questions get asked in global health.
    Negative35 (57.4%)24 (66.7%)11 (44.0%)0.012a
    Neutral9 (14.8%)7 (19.4%)2 (8.0%)
    Positive17 (27.9%)5 (13.9%)12 (48.0%)
…. which research questions get prioritized for funding in global health.
    Negative40 (65.6%)27 (75.0%)13 (52.0%)0.088a
    Neutral3 (4.9%)2 (5.6%)1 (4.0%)
    Positive18 (29.5%)7 (19.4%)11 (44.0%)
…developing collaborative relationships in global health research.
    Negative31 (50.8%)25 (69.4%)6 (24.0%)<0.001b
    Neutral8 (13.1%)5 (13.9%)3 (12.0%)
    Positive22 (36.1%)6 (16.7%)16 (64.0%)
…the data/statistical analyses used in global health research.
    Negative19 (31.2%)11 (30.6%)8 (32.0%)<0.001a
    Neutral27 (44.3%)22 (61.1%)5 (20.0%)
    Positive15 (24.6%)3 (8.3%)12 (48.0%)
authorship decisions on global health papers.
    Negative39 (63.9%)27 (75.0%)12 (48.0%)0.092b
    Neutral11 (18.0%)5 (13.9%)6 (24.0%)
    Positive11 (18.0%)4 (11.1%)7 (28.0%)
equal career advancement opportunities for all people in global health.
    Negative41 (67.2%)28 (77.8%)13 (52.0%)0.060b
    Neutral5 (8.2%)3 (8.3%)2 (8.0%)
    Positive15 (24.6%)5 (13.9%)10 (40.0%)
global health research, overall.
    Negative35 (57.4%)24 (66.7%)11 (44.0%)0.129b
    Neutral6 (9.8%)4 (11.1%)2 (8.0%)
    Positive20 (32.8%)8 (22.2%)12 (48.0%)

[i] a Chi-square test.

b Fisher’s exact test.

Figure 1

Perceptions of the Impact of Colonialism on Several Aspects of Global Health (*** indicates statistically significant findings).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3961 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 13, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 7, 2023
Published on: Feb 6, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Matthew DeCamp, Limbanazo Matandika, Lameck Chinula, Jorge L. Cañari-Casaño, C. Hunter Davis, Emily Anderson, Marlena McClellan, Benjamin H. Chi, Valerie A. Paz-Soldan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.