Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Outcomes of Invasive and Noninvasive Ventilation in a Haitian Emergency Department Cover

Outcomes of Invasive and Noninvasive Ventilation in a Haitian Emergency Department

Open Access
|Oct 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Patient demographics and triage characteristics.

CHARACTERISTICOVERALLINTUBATIONNIPPV
N = 46N = 27 (58.7%)N = 23 (50.0%)
Age, mean ± SD31.41 ± 21.4227.52 ± 20.7737.43 ± 22.86
    Age <1 year, n (%)3 (6.5%)3 (11.1%)0 (0.0%)
    Age 1–4 years, n (%)2 (4.3%)2 (7.4%)1 (4.3%)
    Age 5–17 years, n (%)9 (19.6%)4 (14.8%)5 (21.7%)
    Age 18–24 years, n (%)4 (8.7%)2 (7.4%)2 (8.7%)
    Age 25–34 years, n (%)7 (15.2%)7 (25.9%)1 (4.3%)
    Age 35–44 years, n (%)7 (15.2%)2 (7.4%)5 (21.7%)
    Age 45–54 years, n (%)9 (19.6%)5 (18.5%)5 (21.7%)
    Age >55 years, n (%)5 (10.9%)2 (7.4%)4 (17.4%)
Female, n (%)27 (58.7%)15 (55.6%)14 (60.9%)
Comorbiditiesa,bn = 41n = 23n = 22
    Any comorbidity, n (%)21 (51.2%)9 (39.1%)13 (59.1%)
        Diabetes3 (7.3%)3 (13.0%)0 (0.0%)
        Kidney disease2 (4.9%)0 (0.0%)2 (9.1%)
        Hypertension3 (7.3%)1 (4.3%)2 (9.1%)
        Congestive heart failure8 (19.5%)0 (0.0%)8 (36.4%)
        Asthma4 (9.8%)3 (13.0%)2 (9.1%)
        Tuberculosis1 (2.4%)1 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)
        Other1 (2.4%)1 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)
Number of comorbidities, mean ± SD0.54 ± 0.550.39 ± 0.500.64 ± 0.58
SATS triage levela, n (%)n = 41n = 23n = 20
    Red (highest priority)30 (73.2%)17 (73.9%)15 (75.0%)
    Orange9 (22.0%)5 (21.7%)4 (20.0%)
    Yellow2 (4.9%)1 (4.3%)1 (5.0%)
    Green (lowest priority)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Visit due to trauma, n (%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Triage vitals
    Systolic blood pressuren = 33n = 17n = 18
        mmHg, mean ± SD133.52 ± 39.65120.24 ± 26.60144.78 ± 44.96
        Patient hypotensivec, n (%)6 (18.2%)4 (23.5%)2 (11.1%)
    SpO2n = 42n = 24n = 22
        %, mean ± SD85.12 ± 18.0584.54 ± 21.7085.00 ± 13.64
        SpO2 <90%, n (%)20 (47.6%)10 (41.7%)12 (54.5%)

[i] SATS, South African Triage Scale; SpO2, oxygen saturation.

a Excludes patients with missing data.

b No patients were reported to have comorbid HIV, epilepsy, or stroke.

c Hypotension was defined as SBP <100 for age >12 years, <80 for ages 1–12, and <70 for <1 year old.

Table 2

Presenting diagnosis and indications for advanced respiratory support.

CHARACTERISTICOVERALLINTUBATIONNIPPV
N = 46N = 27 (58.7%)N = 23 (50.0%)
Presumed diagnosis at time of respiratory supporta, n (%)
    Cardiovascular16 (34.8%)4 (14.8%)13 (56.5%)
        Cardiogenic pulmonary edema12 (26.1%)1 (3.7%)11 (47.8%)
        Cardiogenic shock3 (6.5%)0 (0.0%)3 (13.0%)
        Pulmonary embolism1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (4.3%)
        Hypovolemic shock3 (6.5%)3 (11.1%)1 (4.3%)
        Hypertensive emergency2 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)2 (8.7%)
    Respiratory10 (21.7%)5 (18.5%)6 (26.1%)
        Severe asthma6 (13.0%)4 (14.8%)3 (13.0%)
        Acute respiratory distress syndrome2 (4.3%)1 (3.7%)1 (4.3%)
        Pulmonary hemorrhage1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (4.3%)
        COPD0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
    Infectious13 (28.3%)12 (44.4%)3 (13.0%)
        Pneumonia or pulmonary sepsis7 (15.2%)6 (22.2%)3 (13.0%)
        Bacterial infection (unspecified)2 (4.3%)2 (7.4%)0 (0.0%)
    Hematological2 (4.3%)2 (7.4%)0 (0.0%)
    Neurological2 (4.3%)2 (7.4%)0 (0.0%)
    Endocrine3 (6.5%)3 (11.1%)0 (0.0%)
    Other3 (6.5%)2 (7.4%)1 (4.3%)
Indication for advanced respiratory supporta, n (%)
    Hypoxia11 (40.7%)15 (65.2%)
    CO2 retention4 (14.8%)0 (0.0%)
    Respiratory distress2 (7.4%)8 (34.8%)
    Respiratory arrest8 (29.6%)
    Cardiac arrest2 (7.4%)
    Airway protection12 (44.4%)
    Airway obstruction3 (11.1%)
    Other1 (3.7%)0 (0.0%)

[i] COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CO2, carbon dioxide.

a Multiple presumed diagnoses and indications for respiratory support could be selected for a patient.

Table 3

Pre-NIPPV monitoring and NIPPV success.

CHARACTERISTICaNIPPV
N = 23
Last vitals prior to NIPPV
    Systolic blood pressure, mean ± SD (n = 17)123.24 ± 61.82
        Patient hypotensiveb, n (%)4 (23.5%)
    SpO2 (%), mean ± SD88.96 ± 8.90
        SpO2 <90%, n (%)13 (56.5%)
On monitoring prior to NIPPV, n (%)23 (100.0%)
    SpO2 monitoring, n (%)22 (95.7%)
    Blood pressure monitoring, n (%)15 (65.2%)
    Cardiac monitoring, n (%)4 (17.4%)
Diagnostics and findings prior to NIPPV
    Chest X-ray, n (%)5 (21.7%)
        Bilateral infiltrates (n = 3)2 (66.7%)
        Pulmonary edema (n = 3)1 (33.3%)
    Ultrasound, n (%)15 (65.2%)
        B lines (n = 11)7 (63.6%)
        Pleural effusion (n = 11)2 (18.2%)
        Cardiac finding (n = 11)2 (18.2%)
    Blood gas obtained, n (%)7 (30.4%)
NIPPV type, n (%)
    CPAP1 (4.3%)
    BiPAP22 (95.7%)
Patient respiratory status 30 minutes following NIPPV, n (%)
    Improved16 (69.6%)
    Unchanged or worsened7 (30.4%)
SpO2 <90% prior to NIPPV, n (%)13 (56.5%)
    Achieved SpO2 >90% after NIPPV, n (%)11 (84.6%)
Patient required intubation, n (%) (n = 20)4 (20.0%)
NIPPV discontinued during time in ED, n (%) (n = 19)2 (10.5%)

[i] SpO2, oxygen saturation; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; BiPAP, bi-level positive airway pressure.

a For characteristics with missing information, the number of patients with available information is noted in parentheses.

b Hypotension was defined as SBP <100 for age >12 years, <80 for ages 1–12, and <70 for <1 year old.

Table 4

Pre-intubation management and intubation characteristics and complications.

CHARACTERISTICaINTUBATION
N = 27
    Preoxygenation before intubation, n (%) (n = 26)26 (100.0%)
    Nasal cannula2 (7.7%)
    Non-rebreather mask4 (15.4%)
    Simple face mask4 (15.4%)
    BiPAP2 (7.7%)
    Bag valve mask, passive2 (7.7%)
    Bag valve mask, active9 (34.6%)
    Other3 (11.5%)
Last vitals prior to intubation
    Systolic blood pressure, mean ± SD (n = 17)132.06 ± 40.70
        Patient hypotensiveb, n (%)3 (17.6%)
    SpO2 (%), mean ± SD (n = 22)94.50 ± 7.95
        SpO2 <90%, n (%)3 (13.6%)
    Blood gas obtained, n (%)10 (37.0%)
        pH, mean ± SD (n = 7)6.99 ± 0.49
        CO2, mean ± SD (n = 7)52.73 ± 23.68
Formal difficult airway assessment completed, n (%)13 (48.1%)
Difficult airway anticipatedc,d, n (%)10 (37.0%)
    Number of risk factors for difficult airwaye, mean ± SD0.89 ± 1.60
Operator on initial attempt
    EM intern1 (3.7%)
    EM second-year resident16 (59.3%)
    EM third-year resident10 (37.0%)
    EM-trained attending0 (0.0%)
Operator on successful attempt (if 1st attempt unsuccessful)
    Same as initial attempt2 (7.4%)
    EM intern or second-year resident1 (3.7%)
    EM third-year resident6 (22.2%)
    EM-trained attending2 (7.4%)
First-pass success, n (%) (n = 26)15 (57.7%)
    Among second-year residents9 (60.0%)
    Among third-year residents6 (60.0%)
Total number of attempts, mean ± SD1.75 ± 0.94
Overall intubation success, n (%) (n = 26)26 (100.0%)
Any induction agent administeredf, n (%) (n = 22)19 (86.4%)
    Ketamine16 (72.7%)
    Midazolam2 (9.1%)
    Propofol1 (4.5%)
    Fentanyl1 (4.5%)
Any paralytic agent administeredg, n (%) (n = 22)15 (68.2%)
    Succinylcholine10 (45.5%)
    Vecuronium5 (22.7%)
Both induction and paralytic agents administered, n (%) (n = 21)15 (71.4%)
Lowest O2 saturation during intubation (%), mean ± SD (n = 23)93.61 ± 7.33
    Lowest O2 saturation <90%, n (%)4 (17.4%)
Any method of intubation confirmationh, n (%) (n = 21)21 (100.0%)
    Auscultation21 (100.0%)
    Tube condensation13 (61.9%)
    Radiography2 (9.5%)
    CO2 detector0 (0.0%)
Any complicationi, n (%) (n = 26)2 (7.7%)
    Bleeding1 (3.8%)
    Hypoxia (SpO2<90%)1 (3.8%)

[i] BiPAP, bi-level positive pressure ventilation; SpO2, oxygen saturation; CO2, carbon dioxide.

a For characteristics with missing information, the number of patients with available information is noted in parentheses.

b Hypotension was defined as SBP <100 for age >12 years, <80 for ages 1–12, and <70 for <1 year old.

c Difficult airway was defined as an abnormal LEMON assessment, if LEMON assessment was completed; if assessment was not completed, difficult airway included Mallampati Class III/IV; spinal immobilization; or obese body habitus.

d The LEMON method is an airway assessment defined by the following criteria: Look, Evaluate, Mallampati, Obesity or obstruction, and Neck mobility.

e Risk factors included external evaluation, 3-3-2, Mallampati score (3 or 4), obesity, and neck immobility/spinal immobilization.

f No providers reported using lorazepam, etomidate, or morphine for induction.

g Rocuronium is not available for use at HUM.

h Multiple methods of confirmation could be selected.

i No providers reported complications of direct airway injury, cardiac arrest, cricothyroidotomy, dental trauma, hypotension, or laryngospasm.

Figure 1

Flowchart of patients presenting with respiratory failure to the HUM ED.

a Patient remained in the ED for 3 days prior to stabilization and transfer to the general ward.

Table 5

Bivariate analysis of factors associated with survival to discharge.

NIPPVINTUBATION
nSURVIVED TO DISCHARGEDID NOT SURVIVE TO DISCHARGEP VALUEanSURVIVED TO DISCHARGEDID NOT SURVIVE TO DISCHARGEP VALUEa
N = 12N = 11N = 6N = 21
Age
    Age <5 yearsn = 11 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0.328n = 51 (20.0%)4 (80.0%)0.895
    Age 5–18 yearsn = 52 (40.0%)3 (60.0%)0.538n = 41 (25.0%)3 (75.0%)0.885
    Age >18 yearsn = 179 (52.9%)8 (47.1%)0.901n = 184 (22.2%)14 (77.8%)1.000
Female gendern = 146 (42.9%)8 (57.1%)0.265n = 155 (33.3%)10 (66.7%)0.121
Comorbidities
    Congestive heart failuren = 82 (25.0%)6 (75.0%)0.035
    Asthman = 22 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0.176n = 33 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)0.002
High priority triage acuitybn = 1910 (52.6%)9 (47.4%)0.305n = 224 (18.2%)18 (81.8%)0.639
Presumed diagnosis
    Cardiovascularn = 134 (30.8%)9 (69.2%)0.019n = 41 (25.0%)3 (75.0%)0.885
    Respiratoryn = 65 (83.3%)1 (16.7%)0.076n = 54 (80.0%)1 (20.0%)<0.001
    Infectiousn = 32 (66.7%)1 (33.3%)0.590n = 121 (8.3%)11 (91.7%)0.121
On SpO2 monitoring prior to NIPPVn = 2212 (54.5%)10 (45.5%)0.286
Trial of NIPPV before intubationn = 74 (57.1%)3 (42.9%)0.010
Initial operator first- or second-year residentn = 173 (17.6%)14 (82.4%)0.456

[i] SpO2, oxygen saturation.

a P-values were calculated using chi-squared tests.

b High priority triage acuity includes red and orange triage levels. Excludes patients who had missing data on South African Triage Scale triage level.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4009 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 17, 2023
Published on: Oct 19, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Anna P. Fang, Marie Cassandre Edmond, Regan H. Marsh, Manouchka Normil, Nivedita Poola, Sherley Jean Michel Payant, Pierre Ricot Luc, Natalie Strokes, Manise Calixte, Linda Rimpel, Shada A. Rouhani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.