Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Validation of a Practical Approach to Blood Pressure Measurement: Secondary Analysis of Data from a Nationally Representative Survey in India Cover

Validation of a Practical Approach to Blood Pressure Measurement: Secondary Analysis of Data from a Nationally Representative Survey in India

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) and validity of practical BP measurement approach in identifying high BP (≥140/90) compared to standard approach.

Sample sizePrevalence of high BP in % (95% Confidence interval)Practical approach compared to standard (Percentages [95% CI])
Standard ApproachPractical approachSensitivitySpecificityFalse positivityFalse negativity
All372,11015.5
(15.2, 15.7)
14.9
(14.7, 15.1)
85.4
(84.9, 85.8)
98.0
(97.9, 98.1)
11.3
(10.9, 11.7)
2.7
(2.6, 2.7)
Men55,89621.5
(20.9, 22.1)
20.8
(20.3, 21.4)
87.3
(86.3, 88.2)
97.4
(97.1, 97.6)
10.0
(9.2, 10.8)
3.4
(3.2, 3.7)
Women316,21414.4
(14.2, 14.6)
13.8
(13.6, 14.0)
84.9
(84.4, 85.4)
98.1
(98.0, 98.2)
11.6
(11.2, 12.1)
2.5
(2.4, 2.6)
30–44 years285,41513.2
(13.0, 13.5)
12.7
(12.5, 12.9)
83.7
(83.1, 84.3)
98.2
(98.1, 98.3)
12.5
(12.0, 12.9)
2.5
(2.4, 2.6)
45–54 years86,69522.6
(22.2, 23.1)
22.0
(21.6, 22.5)
88.6
(87.9, 89.2)
97.4
(97.2, 97.6)
9.1
(8.5, 9.8)
3.3
(3.1, 3.5)
Table 2

Crosstabulation of different grades of hypertension stratified by Practical and Standard blood pressure measurement approaches (N = 372,110).

Practical approachNStandard Approach (percentage [95% CI])
BP < 140/90140–159/90–99160–179/100–109>180/110
BP < 140/90314,22197.3 (97.2, 97.4)2.5 (2.5, 2.6)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)0 (0, 0)
140–159/90–9942,14115.3 (14.8, 15.8)81.7 (81.2, 82.3)2.9 (2.7, 3.2)0 (0, 0.1)
160–179/100–10911,3240.1 (0.1, 0.2)20.1 (19.0, 21.3)76.3 (75.1, 77.5)3.4 (2.8, 4.0)
180/1104,4240 (0, 0.1)0.7 (0.4, 1.2)15.9 (14.4, 17.5)83.4 (81.8, 85.0)
Table 3

Comparison of prevalence and validity of other various blood pressure (BP) measurement approaches against the Standard approach.

High BP prevalenceSensitivitySpecificityFalse positivity rateFalse negativity rateNo. of BP per person*
Percentages [95% Confidence interval]
Standard15.5 (15.2, 15.7)3.0
Practical14.9 (14.7, 15.1)85.4 (84.9, 85.8)98.0 (97.9, 98.1)11.3 (10.9, 11.7)2.7 (2.6, 2.7)1.4
AHA/JNC-8/NPCDCS19.2 (19.0, 19.5)93.4 (93.1, 93.7)94.3 (94.2, 94.4)25.1 (24.6, 25.6)1.3 (1.2, 1.3)2.0
Johns Hopkins University18.1 (17.8, 18.3)94.1 (93.8, 94.4)95.9 (95.8, 96.0)19.5 (19.0, 20.0)1.1 (1.1, 1.2)1.6
NICE14.6 (14.3, 14.8)84.5 (84.0, 85.0)98.2 (98.1, 98.3)10.5 (10.1, 10.9)2.8 (2.7, 2.9)1.4

[i] * Average number of BP measurements per person per visit.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1085 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 18, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 15, 2021
Published on: Dec 22, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Roopa Shivashankar, Bhawna Sharma, Andrew E. Moran, Anupam Khungar Pathni, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.