Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Age-standardized mean non-HDL cholesterol (mmol/L–1) across the world from the NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Reproduced from NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol. Nature 582, 73–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2338-1 licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

a, Age-standardized mean non-HDL cholesterol in women in 1980. b, Age-standardized mean non-HDL cholesterol in women in 2018. c, Age-standardized mean non-HDL cholesterol in men in 1980. d, Age-standardized mean non-HDL cholesterol in men in 2018.

Figure 2

Events avoided based on baseline absolute risk and absolute lowering of LDL-C (Duality of risk and LDL-C lowering as determinants of benefit from lipid lowering therapies). Adapted from CTT Lancet 2012 The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: Meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials [87].

Figure 3

Benefit of reducing cumulative exposure to LDL on the lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Panel A shows the effect of reducing LDL by 50% from a population median of 3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dl) resulting in an absolute difference of 1.75 mmol/L (67.7 mg/dL) on the lifetime risk of experiencing a major atherosclerotic cardiovascular event (defined as fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization) if LDL lowering is started at ages 30, 40, 50 or 60 years and continued up to age 80 years as compared to either no LDL reduction of lifelong exposure to the same magnitude of lower LDL. Panel B shows the effect on the lifetime risk of experiencing a major atherosclerotic cardiovascular event up to age 80 years from reducing LDL by 33% beginning at age 40 years, or by 50% beginning at age 55 years. Greater benefits are observed if LDL-C lowering is begun at an earlier age.

Table 1

Potential LDL-C reductions achievable through different combinations of lipid lowering treatments.

EXPECTED LDL CHOLESTEROL REDUCTION
PATIENT TYPESTATIN TOLERANTSTATIN INTOLERANCE
Achieveable Reductions≥60%≥80%≥35%≥60%
Potential CombinationsRosuvastatin 20–40 + Ezetimibe 10Rosuvastatin 20–40 + Alirocumab/Evolocumab
(+ Ezetimibe 10)
Ezetimibe 10 + Bile acid abs
Atorvastatin 40–80 + Ezetimibe 10Atorvastatin 40–80 + Alirocumab/Evolocumab (+ Ezetimibe 10)Ezetimibe 10 +
Alirocumab/Evolocumab
Rosuvastatin 5–10 +
Alirocumab/Evolocumab
Atorvastatin 10–20 + Alirocumab/Evolocumab
Rosuvastatin 5–10 + InclisiranAtorvastatin 40–80 + Inclisiran (+ Ezetimibe 10)Bempedoic acid 180 +
Ezetimibe 10
Atorvastatin 10–20 + InclisiranRosuvastatin 20–40 + Inclisiran
(+ Ezetimibe 10)
Bempedoic acid 180 +
Ezetimibe 10 +
Evolocumab, Alirocumab or inclisiran
Atorvastatin 20 +
Ezetimibe 10 +
Bempedoic acid 180
Ezetimibe 10 +
Inclisiran

[i] Reproduced from Ray KK Eur Heart J, ehab718 [76]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab718

Figure 4

Selected WHF member survey responses (based on responses from 38 countries from all WHO regions) © World Heart Federation.

Table 2

Recommendations for population strategies, tests and therapies which should be available globally to manage lipids and ASCVD risk.

LICLMICHIC
Population strategies
(e.g., food labelling/regulation; tobacco legislation)
YYY
Screening
    • Population strategy (e.g., all before 10/reverse cascade)
    • Individual Lipids (TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C)
    • Lp(a)
    • apo B
    • Imaging for risk stratification
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Reshaping Healthcare Systems
e.g., Digital Solutions for data generation informing policy, disease management, decision support tools
YYY
Access to therapies
    General (primary or secondary prevention including HeFH and HoFH)
    Generic high-intensity statins (essential medication)
    Generic statin-ezetimibe combination
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Statin intolerant patients
    Ezetimibe
    Bempedoic acid/bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe
YY
Y
Y
Y
ASCVD or HeFH *
    PCSK9 Mab
    Inclisiran
(Based on LDL-C level and/or risk)
Y
Y
(Based on LDL-C level and/or risk)
Y
Y
HoFH-
    Apheresis
    Lomitapide
    Evinacumab
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Icosapent ethyl esterYY
Fibrates
(as TG lowering therapies for prevention of pancreatitis)
YYY

[i] ** In LIC industry and governments should reach agreement on significantly discounted costs so that that those with inherited lipid disorders are not disenfranchised.

Figure 5

Actionable solutions to address cholesterol control as a means to reduce ASCVD © World Heart Federation.

Table 3

Five focus areas to implement actionable solutions to address cholesterol control as a means to reduce ASCVD.

FOCUS AREA 1: IMPROVE AWARENESSFOCUS 2: ROLL OUT POPULATION-BASED APPROACHES TO PREVENT ASCVD AND REDUCE POPULATION LEVEL CHOLESTEROL EXPOSURE THROUGHOUT THE LIFE-COURSE
Health professionals
  • Conduct awareness and education campaigns to ensure that health professionals:

    • are aware of the continuous graded association between cholesterol blood levels and ASCVD risk: There is no normal cholesterol level, but adequate values based on ASCVD risk.

    • shift focus to the impact of cumulative long-term exposure to cholesterol and risk of ASCVD [52].

    • change to lifetime risk estimation rather than 10-year risk only [37, 77].

    • realise the importance of screening for elevated cholesterol including FH and Lp(a) in early life.

  • Ensure multi-professional teams provide consistent and understandable information to patients [78].

  • Provide tools showing the safety of cholesterol lowering drugs and low cholesterol levels including early use of combination therapies.

  • Adapt evidence-based risk evaluation and guideline recommendations to local needs [78, 79].

Patients and general populations [78]

  • Promote advocacy through greater interaction of patient organisations with healthcare professionals and policy makers.

  • Implement a more inclusive approach in guidelines development, partnering in advocacy an policy influencing, clinical trials design and involvement in regulatory and the technical assessment process.

  • Implement campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of screening for elevated cholesterol including FH and Lp(a).

  • Provide educational programs/tools about lifelong exposure to cholesterol as cause of ASCVD overall. This includes differentiating between different needs among women and men, at different stage of life – childhood, adolescent, family planning phase – specially women [52].

  • Develop educational tools for patients as reliable resources to counterbalance misinformation, e.g., websites; social media; apps.

  • Develop tools to increase adherence to therapy (education, apps, text messaging).

  • Support food reformulation efforts, in particular regarding eliminating artificial trans-fat.

    • Follow WHO recommendations to enact a mandatory 2% limit on industrially produced TFAs in foods or to ban PHOs. The WHO’s REPLACE action package and technical support in country should be leveraged by policymakers to protect their populations from the health harms of TFAs [80].

  • Fully implement the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), in particular: raising tobacco taxes, introducing comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising and sponsorship, placing large health warnings on packaging and legislating for smoke-free environments.

  • Deliver education on healthy dietary patterns with focus on reducing consumption of ultra-processed unhealthy fat containing foods.

  • Generate additional resources at national level, by enforcing adequate taxation policies on unhealthy commodities such as non-alcoholic beverages (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverages), tobacco and alcohol, and allocating these revenues for advancing the prevention and control of NCDs [81].

FOCUS 3: REINFORCE ASCVD RISK ASSESSMENT AND POPULATION SCREENING TO REDUCE UNDER-DIAGNOSIS OF GENETIC DYSLIPIDAEMIASFOCUS 4: IMPLEMENT SYSTEM-LEVEL APPROACHES TARGETING SPECIFICALLY HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS
General population
  • Develop simplified locally-adapted guidelines [79] for whom and how to screen for ASCVD risk based on a total risk approach (consider previous ASCVD, family history and or presence of other risk factors like smoking, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, etc.) [77].

  • Provide risk stratification tools in easy-to-use formats (apps; websites).

  • Focus on lifetime rather than 10-year risk estimation to guide pharmacological therapy [37, 77].

  • Set up point-of-care testing with inexpensive and easy-to-use technologies (e.g., cholesterol test strips).

Screening for FH and Lp(a)

  • Develop and implement national policies for mandated screening; or adjust paediatric guidelines to promote routine universal screening and cascade screening [70]; as well as all guidelines to promote reverse cascade screening.

  • Governments are encouraged to consider, in particular universal child-parent screening and cascade testing of first- and second-degree relatives [70, 82].

  • Provide funds for genetic testing of FH [83].

  • Create care pathways for sign-posting and directing referrals to lipid clinics or tertiary facilities for patients with severe forms of FH like HoFH or HeFH patients refractory to standard lipid lowering therapies.

Allocate sufficient resources for screening and diagnosis throughout the life-course, and risk stratification beginning in childhood on a fair basis, in the best interests of the child, similar to other genetic conditions.

  • Ensure the affordability of essential cholesterol lipid lowering medicines [84]:

    • Ensure affordability of statin and non-statin therapies through free or subsidized drug provision, reducing taxes on pharmaceuticals.

    • Include LLTs, esp. statins, into essential medication packages [68].

    • Ensure the availability of generic potent lipid lowering drugs with WHO, particularly for low- and middle-income countries.

    • Ensure the use of generic statin+ ezetimibe single-pill combination therapies for potent cholesterol reduction, lessen therapy inertia, reduce pill burden, and cope with fear of possible adverse events of high-dose statins.

    • Guarantee access to PCSK9 lowering therapies for cases of severe hypercholesterolemia such as FH and or established ASCVD where cholesterol levels remain well above recommended local goals. Reducing the taxation of these medications, extending patent protection could make these affordable for health care systems.

    • Include a list of essential discounted medications, therapies for severe dyslipdaemia such as HoFH.

    • Provide recommendations towards funding prioritization for prevention and creation of national cardiovascular health programs with the inclusion of cholesterol awareness, testing, and management, and novel therapies accessibility.

  • Reduce complexity of local guidelines to promote first line use of generic potent cholesterol lowering combination therapies (statin + ezetimibe) for those at highest risk.

  • Support the use of polypills (combination pill including aspirin, a beta-blocker, a statin and an ACE inhibitor) among certain high-risk groups (e.g., post-MI, diabetics [85, 86]) reducing cost and promoting adherence.

  • Support the engagement of pharmacists and non-physician health workers in patient support and counselling about drugs benefits, possible adverse events to increase adherence to drug therapy.

  • Foster the use of novel technologies such as apps or text messaging to support patient adherence and cholesterol goal attainment.

  • Develop and implement the use of smart decision support tools at the level of the healthcare system especially in those LMICs where EMR are available or being developed [79].

  • Entering into carefully selected public-private collaborations.

FOCUS 5: ESTABLISH NATIONAL/REGIONAL SURVEILLANCE OF CHOLESTEROL AND ASCVD OUTCOMES
  • Monitor whether patients take recommended medications to reduce cholesterol and control other risk factors, and also if they renew their prescriptions.

    • Use of apps and internet-based resources linking patients, pharmacies, and health care professionals.

    • Creation of health care practitioner monitoring groups (pharmacists; nurses) to help patients with self-care.

  • Monitor whether patients attain cholesterol goals as recommended.

    • Use of apps and internet-based resources.

  • Collect epidemiological data to provide data-driven policies and assess the impact of care -this includes collection of surveillance data on cholesterol levels, ASCVD rates and dietary patterns.

  • Develop reliable health information systems to monitor health behaviours, risk factors, and morbidity and mortality.

  • Implement the WHO Global Monitoring Framework.

  • Reach agreement among governments and intergovernmental agencies upon implementing international standards.

  • Monitor stock outages for essential medicines such as statins.

FOCUS 5: ESTABLISH NATIONAL/REGIONAL SURVEILLANCE OF CHOLESTEROL AND ASCVD OUTCOMES
  • Financially support the development of FH registries to quantify current practices, identify knowledge-practice gaps, publish metrics for monitoring and standardizing care, identify areas for future resource deployment, dissemination and defining best practices as well as facilitating FH awareness and screening.

  • Developing local patient-centred approaches including patient platforms for data entry and education should be considered, ensuring optimal privacy and confidentiality.

  • Resolving aspects related to various insurance and genetic discrimination – stop penalizing, start incentivising adherence and other good behaviours.

Figure 6

Redesigning healthcare strategies to focus on the burden of atherosclerosis throughout the life-course (panel A), with different population approaches using different ‘treatment’ strategies across different age ranges and hence the absolute numbers targeted (Panel B). Low-cost large scale forward thinking provides benefits in the longer term for those at high lifetime risk but low short-term risk and higher cost lower scale provide near time benefits in those at highest short-term risk. Panel C shows the current healthcare expenditure (exemplar) as a proportion of treating the consequences of ASCVD versus prevention of ASCVD and Panel D shows healthcare expenditure if current focus is shifted to prevention (exemplar). © World Heart Federation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1154 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 25, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2022
Published on: Oct 14, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Kausik K. Ray, Brian A. Ference, Tania Séverin, Dirk Blom, Stephen J. Nicholls, Mariko H. Shiba, Wael Almahmeed, Rodrigo Alonso, Magdalena Daccord, Marat Ezhov, Rosa Fernández Olmo, Piotr Jankowski, Fernando Lanas, Roopa Mehta, Raman Puri, Nathan D. Wong, David Wood, Dong Zhao, Samuel S. Gidding, Salim S. Virani, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Fausto Pinto, Pablo Perel, Raul D. Santos, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.