Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors and Barriers on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Willingness to Use among the Community: A 2016–2021 Systematic Review and Data Synthesis Cover

Factors and Barriers on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Willingness to Use among the Community: A 2016–2021 Systematic Review and Data Synthesis

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

PFO strategy in developing research question.

Population (P)Community adults, age 19 years and above
Prognostic Factors (F)The factors or barriers that could influence the outcome (community willingness to perform CPR and using an AED)
Outcome (O)Community willingness to perform CPR and using an AED
Figure 1

Flow diagram of the searching process.

Table 2

Results of the quality assessment.

STUDYRESEARCH DESIGNQA1QA2QA3QA4QA5NUMBER OF CRITERIA FULFILLEDINCLUSION IN THE REVIEW
Bylow et al. [21]QN (R)YYYYY5/5
Cheskes et al. [22]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Fan et al. [23]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Hawkes et al. [24]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Krammel et al. [25]QN (NR)YNYCY3/5
Lee et al. [26]QN (NR)YYYYY5/5
Liaw et al. [27]QN (NR)YYYNY4/5
Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Post et al. [30]QN (NR)YYYYY5/5
Qian et al. [31]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Shams et al. [32]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5
Son et al. [33]QN (DC)YYYYY5/5

[i] Notes: QL = Qualitative; QN (R) = Quantitative randomized controlled trials; QN (NR) = Quantitative non-randomized; QN (DC) = Quantitative descriptive; MX = Mixed-Method; Y = Yes; N = No; C = Can’t tell.

Table 3

A summary of the studies included in this study.

FIRST AUTHOR (YEAR)COUNTRY, PERIOD OF STUDYSTUDY COVERAGESAMPLE SIZE AND POPULATIONINTERVENTIONCOMPARISONFACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH WILLINGNESSBARRIERS
Bylow (2019)
Sweden, 2014–2016
BLS (CPR and AED)1,231
Public in the community
Basic life support training interventionTo compare the effectiveness of two BLS training intervention, self-learning training or traditional instructor-led trainingTrainingNot applicable
Cheskes (2016)
Canada, 1 week
CPR428
Adults living in Canada
Not applicableChest-compression-only CPR (CCO-CPR) compared to traditional CPR with mouth-to-mouth (MTM) ventilationsGender, type of CPR trainingLack of knowledge, fear of litigation, lack of skill confidence
Fan (2016)
Hong Kong, 2 November–15 December 2015 (excluding Saturdays and public holidays)
AED401
All pedestrians in the vicinity of a mass transit railway (MTR) station in six locations across different districts of Hong Kong
Not applicableComparison of first aiders with non–first aidersTrainingNot applicable
Hawkes (2019)
United Kingdom, May 2017
CPR and PAD2,084
UK adults
Not applicableCCO-CPR, CPR, and Public Access Defibrillator (PAD) trainingAge, gender, occupation, marital status, training, length of time since last training, confidence in performing CPRNot applicable
Krammel (2018)
Austria, August–September 2014
BLS (CPR and AED)501
Residents of Vienna (Austria)
Not applicableComparison of gender and age-specific aspects of awareness and knowledgeAge, genderNot applicable
Lee (2021)
South Korea, February 2012, December 2016, and December 2018
AED3,069
Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea
Not applicable973 in the 2012 survey (first group), 1,095 in the 2016 survey (second group), and 1,001 in the 2018 survey (third group)Gender, length of time since last training, legal obligation, awareness of how to use an AEDLack of knowledge, fear of litigation, injuring victim due to using AED, not interested in AED
Liaw (2020)
Malaysia, February–November 2018
CPR and AED184
Employees from UNIMAS, Malaysia
Training program on how to use the AED and perform CPRTo determine the effectiveness of the training program, to improve the perception of using AED and performing CPR (‘pre-test’ vs. ‘post-test’)Training, perception, confidence behaviorFear of disease transmission, injuring victim due to performing CPR, injuring own self due to performing CPR, injuring victim due to using AED, injuring own self due to using AED
Pei-Chuan Huang (2019)
Taiwan, April–June 2013
CPR1,073
Public in Taiwan
Not applicableNot applicableGender, training, legal obligationFear of legal responsibilities, injuring victim due to performing CPR
Pei-Chuan Huang (2021)
Taiwan, April–June 2013
AED1,073
Public in Taiwan
Not applicableNot applicableGender, training, attitudeFear of legal responsibilities, lack of skill confidence, injuring victim due to using AED
Post (2019)
United States
CPR and AED769
Coaches of high school teams and club teams with high school-aged athletes in 3 sports (basketball, soccer, and volleyball)
High school coaches were required to undergo annual CPR/AED trainingEmergency preparedness and training existed between coaches of high school teams and coaches of high school-aged club teamsTrainingNot applicable
Qian (2021)
People’s Republic of China, October–December 2020
BLS (CPR and AED)2,812
Urban residents in Nantong City
NoneResidents with first aid experience and residents without first aid experienceAge, education level, occupation, trainingFear of legal responsibilities, fear of disease transmission, injuring victim due to performing CPR, performing MTM artificial respiration, concern that peoples around them will complain, unwillingness to touch strangers
Shams (2016)
Lebanon, 1 March–30 June 2015
CPR and AED948
University students in Lebanon
Not applicableNot applicableSocial grade, training, confidence in performing CPRLack of knowledge, fear of disease transmission, injuring victim due to performing CPR, poor hygiene of victim, presence of vomit or blood
Son (2017)
South Korea, 3–14 February 2012
CPR and AED1,000
Adults aged 19 years or above living in Daegu metropolitan city.
Not applicableType of CPR education, total no. of CPR education sessions attended, period from the last CPR education session,
AED training included in CPR education
Age, gender, education level, type of CPR training, length of time since last training, number of times trained, confidence in performing CPR, legal obligationNot applicable
Table 4

Factors analysed in each of the included studies.

FACTORSAUTHORFACTORS INFLUENCING WILLINGNESS TO PERFORM CPR/USE AN AEDSTRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION/SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
Socio-demographics
AgeYounger ageHawkes et al. [24]aged 18 to 34 years are less likely to phone EMS compared with those aged ≥35 years
  • – OR: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.30–0.69)

aged 18 to 34 years were significant indicators had undergone any type of training and training in CPR, both in the past 5 years.
  • – OR 1.63 (95% CI: 1.27–2.08)

Krammel et al. [25]age <45 years are highest willingness to perform CPR compared to 45 years and above
  • – (<45: 40% vs. >45: 31%; OR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.57 ± 0.92]; p = 0.027)

age <45 years are highest willingness to use AED compared to 45 years and above
  • – (<45: 57% vs. >45: 54%; OR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.54 ± 0.85]; p = 0.001)

Qian et al. [31]18–29 years
  • – 2.53 ± 0.52 (p < 0.001)

Son et al. [33]the rates of willingness to perform CPR decreased with older age
  • – 20 to 29 years (64.6%), 50 to 59 years (59.8%), 60 years or above (38.6%)

GenderMaleSon et al. [33]male respondents reported a willingness to perform CPR
  • – 67.5% among male respondents

Lee et al. [26]willingness to use AEDs were male
  • – AOR, 1.39 (95% CI: 1.10–1.75

Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]men were more likely to perform CPR than women
  • – OR: 2.34, p = 0.005

Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]men were more likely use AED
  • – OR: 2.37, p = 0.007

Hawkes et al. [24]women were less likely than men to go and get an AED, and use an AED
  • – go and get an AED (OR: 0.80) (95% CI: 0.66–0.97)

  • – use an AED (OR: 0.63) (95% CI: 0.51–0.78)

Krammel et al. [25]female individuals reported a significantly lower willingness to initiate CPR and to use an AED device
  • – initiate CPR (male: 40% vs. female: 25%; OR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.39 ± 2.98]; p < 0.001)

  • – use an AED device (male: 58% vs. female: 44%; OR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.26 ± 2.53]; p = 0.002)

WomenCheskes et al. [22]women were more likely indicate a willingness to perform CPR
  • – OR: 2.3, 95% CI [1.4, 3.8]

Education LevelHigher education levelSon et al. [33]college graduates or respondents with a higher level of education.
  • – 68.9% of 560 college graduates or respondents with a higher level of education (p < 0.001)

Qian et al. [31]postgraduate and above
  • – willingness to rescue 2.50±0.53 (p < 0.001)

  • – willingness to rescue under professional guidance 2.83 ± 0.40 (p < 0.001)

  • – willingness to rescue after learning BLS 2.73 ± 0.47 (p < 0.001)

Social grade/OccupationShams et al. [32]earning higher income
  • – p = 0.009

Hawkes et al. [24]social grade A, B, or C1*
  • – OR: 1.70 (95% CI: 1.17–2.47)

Qian et al. [31]different type of occupation
  • – p < 0.0001

Marital statusMarriedHawkes et al. [24]married or living as married is a predictive factor to perform CO-CPR, CPR and were more likely to go and get an AED
  • – perform CO-CPR (OR: 1.30) (95% CI: 1.07–1.57)

  • – perform CPR (OR: 1.35) (95% CI: 1.10–1.66

  • – go and get an AED (OR: 1.4) (95% CI: 1.10–1.80

Training
Type of CPR trainingInterest to participate in CPR training course and belief that the public should participate in CPR training coursesPei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]those who expressed interest in attending a course
  • – OR: 2.79, p = 0.001

those who believed that the public should participate in CPR training courses
  • – OR: 2.84, p = 0.048

Interest to participate in an AED training course and belief that the public should learn how to use AEDsPei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]those who expressed interest to participate in a training course
  • – OR: 3.14, p = 0.001

those who believed that the public should learn how to use AEDs
  • – OR: 5.06, p < 0.001

Previous CPR trainingShams et al. [32]previous CPR training were significant predictors of willingness to perform CPR in the event of a cardiac arrest
  • – OR: 1.627 (95% CI: 1.018–2.600) (p = 0.042)

First aid experience and without first aid experienceQian et al. [31]those with first aid experience were more willing to attempt rescue than those without first aid experience
  • – 66.72% of 445 respondent with first aid experience were more willing to attempt rescue (p < 0.001)

First aiders with and without AED trainingFan et al. [23]those with AED training were also more likely to commence CPR and were more likely to try to locate an AED and apply it
  • – perform CPR (47.4% vs 8.0%, p < 0.001)

  • – try to locate an AED (53.3% vs 17.4%, p < 0.001)

  • – apply AED (41.6% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001)

Instructor-led training and self-learning trainingBylow et al. [21]instructor-led training resulted in a statistically significant higher total score, self-assessed knowledge, and willingness to act immediately compared to self-learning training
  • – median 61 vs 59, p < 0.0001

Didactic plus practise group and didactic only groupSon et al. [33]the rate of CPR willingness in the didactic plus practice group was significantly higher than that in the didactic only group
  • – 79.9% vs 63.9%

didactic plus practise group found to be significantly associated with CPR willingness compared to didactic only group
  • – AOR: 3.38 (95% CI: 2.3-5.0)

CCO-CPR and traditional CPR with MTM ventilationCheskes et al. [22]the proportion of respondents willing to provide CCO-CPR was significantly greater than the proportion of respondents willing to perform traditional CPR with MTM ventilations
  • – the unknown OHCA victim (61.5% vs 39.7%, p < 0.001), stranger (55.1% vs 38.8%, p < 0.001) and unkempt/homeless individual (47.9% vs 28.5%, p < 0.001)

High school coaches and club coachesPost et al. [30]high school coaches having greater levels of emergency preparedness for immediate medical care during practices and competitions than club sport coaches
  • – 58.6% high school coaches had trained in three categories CPR training, AED training or first-aid training compared with 23.9% of club coaches (X2 = 84.9, P < .001).

CCO-CPR, CPR and PAD trainingHawkes et al. [24]having ever trained in CPR (CO-CPR and/or CPR) was the most important factor in the willingness of an individual to call EMS
  • – OR 9.18 (95% CI: 4.39–19.23)

having ever trained in CPR (CO-CPR and/or CPR) was the most important factor in the willingness of an individual to perform CPR
  • – OR: 5.39 (95% CI: 4.29–6.76)

training in defibrillator use ever were the most significant predictive factors for an individual’s willingness to go and get or use an AED
  • – OR: 2.62 (95% CI: 1.71–4.01)

Length of time since last trainingLee et al. [26]CPR training experience in the previous 2 years were associated with willingness to use AEDs
  • – AOR: 1.80 (95% CI: 1.43–2.28)

Son et al. [33]Interval of less than 6 months
  • – AOR was 4.47 (95% CI: 1.29-15.52) for intervals shorter than 6 months

AED training was included in CPR education
  • – AOR for CPR willingness was 5.98 (95% CI: 2.30-15.53)

Hawkes et al. [24]training in CPR in the past 5 years
  • – OR: 1.37 (95% CI: 1.04–1.80)

training in AED in the past 5 years
  • – OR: 2.26 (95% CI: 1.32–3.89)

  • – use an AED 5.20 (95% CI: 3.07–8.82)

Number of times trainedSon et al. [33]group receiving CPR education on 4 or more occasions
  • – AOR: 7.68 (95% CI: 3.21-18.35)

AttitudePositive attitudePei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]“belief that the public should learn how to use AEDs” were the independent factors associated with a higher willingness among bystanders to use AEDs
  • – OR: 5.06, p < 0.001

Perceived normsSocial pressureLee et al. [26]perception of “awareness of how to use an AED”
  • – AOR: 4.40 (95% CI: 3.26–5.93)

Liaw et al. [27]perception of “using AED is important for unresponsive victims”
  • – z = 4.32, p < 0.001

perception of “AED practice drills should be performed on a regular basis”
  • – z = – 2.41, p = 0.02

Self-efficacyPerceptions of their capacity to engage in the behaviour with a predictable resultShams et al. [32]confident in one’s ability to apply an AED, or perform CPR.
  • – perform CPR (OR: 1.93) (95% CI: 1.285–2.898) (p = 0.002)

  • – apply an AED (OR: 1.761) (95% CI: 1.021–3.036) (p = 0.042)

Son et al. [33]confidence in performing CPR
  • – 95.3% of 85 respondents (p < 0.001)

Hawkes et al. [24]having witnessed an arrest was associated with a greater likelihood to perform CPR and to use an AED
  • – to perform CPR (OR: 1.53) (95% CI: 1.17–2.01)

  • – to use an AED (OR: 1.61) (95% CI: 1.23–2.12)

Liaw et al. [27]increase the confidence to perform CPR, use AED, identify victims with no signs of life, and the willingness to perform CPR and AED without hesitancy
  • – increase the confidence to perform CPR (z = – 8.56, p< 0.001)

  • – use AED (z = – 8.93, p < 0.001)

  • – identify victims with no signs of life (z = – 7.88, p < 0.001)

  • – and the willingness to perform CPR and AED without hesitancy (z = – 8.91, p < 0.001)

Legal obligationSon et al. [33]increased the respondent’s willingness to perform CPR in South Korea under Korean EMS laws
  • – 66.9% of 130 respondents reported their willingness, (p = 0.017)

Lee et al. [26]increased the respondent’s willingness to use AEDs in South Korea under Korean EMS laws
  • – AOR: 1.45 (95% CI: 1.13–1.86)

Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]increased the respondent’s willingness to perform CPR in Taiwan under limited Good Samaritan immunity
  • – 85.4% of 916 respondent is reported their willingness

[i] Notes: *High managerial, administrative, or professional; B: intermediate managerial, administrative, or professional; C1: supervisory, clerical, and junior managerial, administrative, or professional.

Table 5

Barriers analysed in each of the included studies.

BARRIERSSTUDIES
Lack of knowledgeCheskes et al. [22]; Shams et al. [32]; Lee et al. [26]
Fear of litigation/legal responsibilitiesCheskes et al. [22]; Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]; Lee et al. [26]; Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]; Qian et al. [34]
Lack of skill confidenceCheskes et al. [22]; Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]
Fear of disease transmissionShams et al. [32]; Liaw et al. [35]; Qian et al. [34]
Injuring victim due to performing CPRShams et al. [32]; Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28]; Liaw et al. [35]; Qian et al. [34]
Injuring own self due to performing CPRLiaw et al. [35]
Injuring victim due to using AEDLiaw et al. [35]; Lee et al. [26]; Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29]
Not interested in AEDLee et al. [26]
Injuring own self due to using AEDLiaw et al. [35]
Poor hygiene of victimShams et al. [32]
Presence of vomit or bloodShams et al. [32]
Performing mouth-to-mouth artificial respirationQian et al. [34]
Concern that peoples around them will complainQian et al. [34]
Unwillingness to touch strangersQian et al. [34]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1255 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 7, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 11, 2023
Published on: Aug 25, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Amsyar Daud, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi, Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Mohammad Fadhly Yahya, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.