Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Rheumatic Heart Disease Patients Undergoing Surgical Valve Procedures in Uganda Cover

Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Rheumatic Heart Disease Patients Undergoing Surgical Valve Procedures in Uganda

Open Access
|Nov 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Central Illustration – General characteristics of surgical valve procedures in the Uganda national RHD registry and a needs assessment to increase access to surgical management of RHD in Uganda.

*: Clinical complications of RHD include heart failure, arrhythmias, stroke and systemic embolism, infective endocarditis. RHD: Rheumatic Heart Disease; SSA: sub-Saharan Africa; PVT: Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis; WOCBP: Women of Child Bearing Potential; INR: International Normalized Ratio.

Table 1

General characteristics of surgical valve procedures.

VOLUME OF PROCEDURES
Total number of procedures367
Total number of patients359
Female (n = 359 patients)215 (59.9%)
AGE AT TIME OF SURGERY, YEARS (n = 367 PROCEDURES)
5–1025 (6.8%)
11–20180 (49.1%)
21–3079 (21.5%)
31–4044 (12.0%)
41–5031 (8.4%)
51–605 (1.4%)
61–703 (0.8%)
TYPE OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE (n = 367)
MV Replacement127 (34.6%)
MV Replacement and TV Repair68 (18.5%)
MV and AV Replacement57 (15.5%)
MV and AV Replacement, TV Repair33 (9.0%)
AV Replacement33 (9.0%)
MV Repair31 (8.5%)
MV Repair and TV Repair9 (2.5%)
AV Replacement and MV Repair4 (1.1%)
AV Repair2 (0.5%)
Mitral Commissurotomy2 (0.5%)
MV, AV, and TV Replacement1 (0.3%)
TYPES OF PROSTHETIC VALVES USED IN VALVE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURES (n = 323 PROCEDURES)
Mechanical Valve312 (96.6%)
Bioprosthetic Valve11 (3.4%)
SURVIVAL STATUS (n = 359 PATIENTS)
Alive307 (85.5%)
Dead47 (13.1%)
Unknown Status5 (1.4%)
SPONSORING ENTITY (n = 367 PROCEDURES)
Charity Efforts286 (77.9%)
Patient/Family Out-of-Pocket Payment69 (18.8%)
Employer10 (2.7%)
Medical Insurance2 (0.5%)
COUNTRIES (AND CENTERS) WHERE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED (n = 367 PROCEDURES)
Uganda (Uganda Heart Institute)115 (31.4%)
Sudan (Salaam Center)188 (51.2%)
India (multiple centers)46 (12.5%)
Other Countries18 (4.9%)

[i] MV: Mitral valve; TV: Tricuspid Valve; AV: Aortic valve; Unknown status was assigned to patients who had not been seen in any RHD registry clinic for more than 1 year and had been unreachable on phone for more than 6 months.

Figure 2

Number of surgical procedures by year and country where they were performed.

*Patients were operated upon before inception of the Uganda national RHD registry, but were enrolled into the registry upon its inception in 2009. They continue to receive care under the registry with all clinical outcomes registered prospectively.

Table 2

Description of known deaths following valve replacement surgery.

MORTALITY AFTER VALVE REPLACEMENT (n = 45)
Females, n (%)27 (60%)
Patients with mechanical valves, n (%)44 (98%)
Patients with bioprosthetic valves, n (%)1 (2%)
Time from operation to death, n (%)
Surgical mortality*14 (31%)
Late mortality#
• Within 12 months13 (29%)
• 13–24 months5 (11%)
• 25–36 months5 (11%)
• >36 months8 (18%)
Causes of death¶
Surgical mortality*, n (%)14 (31%)
Post-operative hemorrhagic shock1
Post-operative cardiac and/or multi-organ-failure13
Late mortality#, n (%)31 (69%)
Heart Failure10
Major Bleeding (VKA-related)2
Confirmed prosthetic valve thrombosis2
Suspected prosthetic valve thrombosis2
Venous thrombo-embolism1
Acute reaction to BPG1
Acute Kidney Injury1
Severe Malaria1
Homicide1
Sudden unexpected death4
Unknown (unclear or total lack of history surrounding the death)6

[i] BPG: Benzyl Benzathine Penicillin; *Surgical mortality: death prior to hospital discharge OR within 30 days of surgery; #Late mortality: death after hospital discharge OR after 30 days of surgery; Causes of death: most causes of death were confirmed from hospital records; Sudden unexpected death based on verbal autopsy with a family member; Verbal autopsy attempted but unfruitful or inconclusive.

Table 3

Mortality following double valve replacement and other surgical procedures by country where operations were performed.

DOUBLE VALVE REPLACEMENT‡OTHER SURGICAL PROCEDURES¶
SURGICAL MORTALITY*UGANDA (n = 26)ABROAD (n = 65)P-VALUEUGANDA (n = 89)ABROAD (n = 187)P-VALUE
2 (7.7%)2 (3.1%)0.6867 (7.9%)3 (1.6%)0.024
Late Mortality#UGANDA (n = 24)ABROAD (n = 63)P-VALUEUGANDA (n = 82)ABROAD (n = 184)P-VALUE
4 (16.7%)7 (11.1%)0.4867 (8.5%)15 (8.2%)0.916

[i] * Surgical mortality: death prior to hospital discharge OR within 30 days of surgery; #Late mortality: death after hospital discharge OR after 30 days of surgery; ‡‘Double valve replacement procedures’ included replacement of the mitral and aortic valve, with or without tricuspid valve intervention; ¶‘Other surgical procedures’ included single valve replacement procedures with or without repair, valve repair-only procedures, and surgical commissurotomy procedures.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival or freedom from re-operation in registry patients undergoing valve replacement versus valve repair.

Valve repair and mitral commissurotomy, n = 43 (41 valve repairs, 2 mitral valve commissurotomies); Valve replacement, n = 314. This analysis excluded 1 valve repair and 4 valve replacement patients who had unknown outcomes.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1260 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 26, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 7, 2023
Published on: Nov 14, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Joselyn Rwebembera, Andrew Y. Chang, Samalie M. Kitooleko, Gloria Kaudha, Sarah de Loizaga, Miriam Nalule, Kenneth Ahabwe, Wanzhu Zhang, Emmy Okello, Pranava Sinha, Tom Mwambu, Craig Sable, Andrea Beaton, Chris T. Longenecker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.