Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical Outcome of Rheumatic Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement Surgery in Indonesia; A Comparison with Non-Rheumatic Aetiology Cover

Clinical Outcome of Rheumatic Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement Surgery in Indonesia; A Comparison with Non-Rheumatic Aetiology

Open Access
|Jan 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Flow chart of patients’ recruitment based on the aetiology of mitral valve disease and the surgical approach.

Table 1

Basic characteristics of MV surgery patients based on aetiology and surgical approach.

VARIABLESRHEUMATIC HEART DISEASENON-RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE
TOTAL
n = 814
MITRAL REPAIR
n = 167
MITRAL REPLACE
n = 647
TOTAL
n = 568
MITRAL REPAIR
n = 353
MITRAL REPLACE
n = 215
Demography
Age43 (18–70)41 (18–69)43 (18–70)54 (18–78)*54 (18–78)53 (18–73)
Female515 (63.3%)112 (67.1%)403 (62.3%)182 (32%)*121 (34.3%)61 (28.4%)
Body Mass Index21.9 (13.6–43.4)22.1 (13.6–39.7)21.8 (14.0–43.4)23.1 (12.9–39.1)*23.5 (12.9–39.1)22.2(14.5–39.1)‡
Preoperative Comorbidities
Atrial Fibrillation587 (72.1%)106 (63.5%)481 (74.3%)†180 (31.7%)*106 (30%)74 (34.4 %)
DM with Insulin, n (%)6 (0.7%)1 (0.6%)5 (0.8%)6 (1.1%)4 (1.1%)2 (0.9%)
COPD, n (%)5 (0.6%)0 (0%)5 (0.8%)2 (0.4%)0 (0%)2 (0.9%)
Hypertension81 (10%)14 (8.4%)67 (10.4%)179 (31.5%)*117 (33.1%)62 (28.8%)
CKD (CCL< 50 ml/m2)119 (14.6%)26 (15.6%)93 (14.4%)146 (25.7%)*80 (22.7%)66 (30.7%)‡
NYHA fc III-IV402 (49.4%)76 (45.5%)326 (50.4%)254 (44.7%)151 (42.8%)103 (47.9%)
Infective Endocarditis22 (2.7%)5 (3%)17 (2.6%)44 (7.7%)*10 (2.8%)34 (15.8%)‡
Concomitant Cardiac Surgery/Intervention
CABG27 (3.3%)6 (3.6%)21 (3.2%)93 (16.4%)*48 (13.6%)45 (20.9%)
Aortic Valve Surgery238 (29.2%)46 (27.5%)192 (29.7%)40 (7%)*18 (5.1%)22 (10.2%)‡
Tricuspid Valve Surgery472 (58%)82 (49.1%)390 (60.3%)†141 (24.8%)*60 (17%)81 (37.7%)‡
≥3 surgical procedures134 (16.5%)25 (15%)109 (16.8%)16 (2.8%)*4 (1.1%)12 (5.6%)‡
History of PTMC13 (1.6%)3 (1.8%)10 (1.5%)0 (0%)*0 (0%)0 (0%)
CPB time106 (41–390)109 (44–251)105.5 (41–390)100 (10–515)*95 (10–261)110 (45–515)‡
Aox time80 (5–319)78 (5–225)80.5 (27–319)76 (12–467)*72.50 (12–235)82 (25–467)‡
Cardiac condition (echo parameters)
LVEF (%)60 (20–82)60 (22–80)60 (20–82)66 (25–89)*67 (27–89)65 (25–82)‡
TAPSE (mm)18 (6–37)19 (8–36)18 (6.0–37.0)†23 (5.3–40)*24.0 (6.2–39.4)22 (5.3–40)
TVG41 (0–156)37 (0–100)42 (0–156)31 (0–111)*30 (0–108)33 (0–111)‡
Mitral stenosis342 (42%)69 (41.3%)273 (42.2%)0 (0%)*0 (0%)0 (0%)
Mitral regurgitation166 (20.4%)52 (31.1%)114 (17.6%)†568 (100%)*353 (100%)215 (100%)
Mixed mitral valve disease306 (37.6%)46 (27.5%)260 (40.2%)†0 (0%)*0 (0%)0 (0%)
Risk Assessment for Mortality
Euroscore II2.0 (0.5–19.5)1.9 (0.5–19.5)2.1 (0.5–16.2) †1.6 (0.5–21.3)*1.4 (0.5–14.0)2.2 (0.5–21.3)‡

[i] DM: diabetes mellitus, COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, CKD: chronic kidney disease, NYHA fc: New York Heart Association functional class, CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, PTMC: percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy, CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass, AoX: aortic cross-clamp, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, TVG: tricuspid valve gradient.

*Comparing RHD and non-RHD, p < 0.05.

†Comparing repair and replacement in RHD, p < 0.05.

‡Comparing repair and replacement in non-RHD repair, p < 0.05.

Figure 2

The echocardiographic pictures of rheumatic mitral valve disease pre (above picture) and post repaired (below picture).

Figure 3

The echocardiographic pictures of rheumatic mitral valve disease pre (above picture) and post replacement with mechanical prosthetic valve (below picture).

Table 2

Outcome following mitral valve surgery based on aetiology and surgical approach.

VARIABLESRHEUMATIC HEART DISEASENON-RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE
TOTAL
n = 814
MITRAL REPAIR
n = 167
MITRAL REPLACE
n = 647
TOTAL
n = 568
MITRAL REPAIR
n = 353
MITRAL REPLACE
n = 215
Early outcome
30-day mortality71 (8.7%)14 (8.4%)57 (8.8%)25 (4.4%)*12 (3.4%)13 (6.0%)
30-day reoperation15 (1.8%)4 (2.4%)11 (1.7%)9 (1.6%)6 (1.7%)3 (1.4%)
Late outcome
Late all-cause mortality136 (16.7%)22 (13.2%)114 (17.6%)92 (16.2%)46 (13%)46 (21.4%)‡
Late MV reoperation3 (0.4%)0 (0%)3 (0.5%)5 (0.9%)4 (1.1%)1 (0.5%)

[i] MV: mitral valve.

* Comparing RHD and non-RHD, p < 0.05.

† Comparing repair and replacement in RHD, p < 0.05.

‡ Comparing repair and replacement in non-RHD repair, p < 0.05.

Table 3

Factors associated with 30-day mortality after rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

VARIABLEUNIVARIATEMULTIVARIATE
OR95%CIp-VALUEOR95%CIp-VALUE
Age > 60 Years2.821.25–6.380.018*
Female0.600.37–0.980.0560.550.33–0.910.020*
BMI > 25.0 kg/m20.530.28–1.040.0820.530.27–1.040.064
Atrial Fibrillation2.861.40–5.860.004*2.861.39–5.890.004*
Hypertension0.990.44–2.241.00
NYHA fc III–IV1.751.06–2.890.036*
Infective Endocarditis1.050.24–4.581.00
Concomitant AVR1.260.75–2.120.454
Concomitant TVr1.370.82–2.280.276
Concomitant CABG2.480.91–6.770.078
≥3 surgical procedures1.410.77–2.570.346
History of PTMC1.930.42–8.880.316
LVEF < 30%1.760.21–14.780.473
TAPSE < 17 mm1.470.90–2.390.155
TVG ≥ 50 mmHg0.910.55–1.510.811
Mitral Stenosis1.470.90–2.390.154
Mitral Regurgitation0.700.36–1.360.358
Mixed MV Disease0.840.50–1.400.574
Mitral valve Repair0.950.51–1.750.984
Euroscore II > 43.321.70–6.490.001*3.861.93–7.74<0.0001*

[i] BMI: body mass index, AVR: Aortic Valve Replacement, TVr: Tricuspid Valve repair, CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, PTMC: percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy, LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, TVG: Tricuspid Valve Gradient. Data were analysed using the Chi-Square Test and Logistic Regression for the multivariate analysis. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Table 4

Factors associated with 30-day mortality after non-rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

VARIABLEUNIVARIATEMULTIVARIATE
OR95%CIp-VALUEOR95%CIp-VALUE
Age > 60 Years3.361.48–7.610.005*3.061.24–7.530.015*
Female0.520.19–1.400.271
BMI > 25.0 kg/m20.170.04–0.720.012*0.220.05–0.950.042*
Atrial Fibrillation4.111.78–9.490.001*3.061.25–7.480.014*
COPD22.581.37–372.040.086
CKD (CCL < 50 ml/m2)2.381.05–5.360.057
NYHA fc III-IV2.280.99–5.250.0752.651.06–6.650.038*
Infective Endocarditis1.040.24–4.551.000
Concomitant AVR1.870.53–6.520.409
Concomitant TVr2.961.32–6.650.012*
Concomitant CABG2.070.84–5.100.160
≥3 surgical procedures16.835.54–51.11<0.001*15.574.46–54.31<0.001*
TAPSE < 17 mm1.310.44–3.930.548
TVG ≥ 50 mmHg1.750.74–4.160.300
Mitral valve Repair0.550.25–1.220.200
Euroscore II > 43.861.36–10.950.020*

[i] BMI: body mass index, AVR: Aortic Valve Replacement, TVr: Tricuspid Valve repair, CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, PTMC: percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy, LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, TVG: Tricuspid Valve Gradient. Data were analysed using the Chi-Square Test and Logistic Regression for the multivariate analysis. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Table 5

Factors associated with late mortality in patients with rheumatic MV surgery.

VARIABLEUNIVARIATEMULTIVARIATE
HR95%CIp-VALUEHR95%CIp-VALUE
Age > 60 Years2.721.56–4.74<0.001*2.171.23–3.810.007*
Female0.570.41–0.80<0.001*0.580.41–0.830.002*
BMI > 25.0 kg/m20.910.61–1.350.633
Atrial Fibrillation3.271.91–5.59<0.001*3.422.0–5.87<0.001*
DM with Insulin. n (%)1.990.49–8.030.335
Hypertension0.960.54–1.700.881
NYHA fc III-IV1.781.25–2.540.001*1.621.13–2.320.008*
Infective Endocarditis0.740.24–2.320.602
Concomitant AVR1.591.13–2.250.008*1.601.12–2.280.010 *
Concomitant TVr1.030.74–1.450.850
Concomitant CABG1.190.49–2.910.702
≥3 surgical procedures1.561.04–2.350.031*
History of PTMC1.970.73–5.320.1822.700.99–7.390.053
LVEF < 30%2.170.54–8.790.276
TAPSE < 17 mm1.340.96–1.880.086
TVG ≥ 50 mmHg0.930.65–1.320.687
Mitral Stenosis1.220.87–1.700.258
Mitral Regurgitation0.850.55–1.320.470
Mixed mitral Valve Disease0.910.64–1.290.586
Mitral valve Repair0.770.49–1.220.266
Euroscore II > 4.02.561.59–4.12<0.001*2.081.26–3.440.004*

[i] BMI: body mass index, AVR: Aortic Valve Replacement, TVr: Tricuspid Valve repair, CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, PTMC: percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy, LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, TVG: Tricuspid Valve Gradient. Data were analysed by Cox Regression. *Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).

Table 6

Factors associated with late mortality in patients with non-rheumatic MV surgery.

VARIABLEUNIVARIATEMULTIVARIATE
HR95%CIp-VALUEHR95%CIp-VALUE
Age > 60 Years1.861.19–2.900.006*1.500.95–2.380.085
Female0.550.33–0.910.020*0.560.33–0.940.029*
BMI > 25.0 kg/m20.680.42–1.070.097
Atrial Fibrillation2.751.82–4.14<0.001*2.311.51–3.52<0.001*
COPD3.500.49–25.190.214
CKD (CCL < 50 ml/m2)1.921.26–2.920.002*1.581.01–2.480.046*
NYHA fc III-IV2.121.38–3.270.001*2.271.47–3.53<0.0001*
Infective Endocarditis0.380.12–1.180.0940.370.11–1.180.092
Concomitant AVR1.860.99–3.490.054
Concomitant TVr1.861.20–2.870.005*
Concomitant CABG1.661.03–2.670.039*
≥3 surgical procedures6.063.03–12.13<0.001*3.971.93–8.18<0.001*
TAPSE < 17 mm1.861.13–3.090.016*
TVG ≥ 50 mmHg1.150.71–1.880.566
Mitral valve Repair0.580.38–0.870.009*0.650.42–0.990.047*
Euroscore II > 42.761.53–4.960.001*

[i] BMI: body mass index, AVR: Aortic Valve Replacement, TVr: Tricuspid Valve repair, CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, PTMC: percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy, LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, TVG: Tricuspid Valve Gradient. Data were analysed by Cox Regression. *Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).

Figure 4

Cumulative survival, comparison between MVr and MVR in the RHD group.

Figure 5

Cumulative survival, comparison between MVr and MVR in the non-RHD group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1285 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 5, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 18, 2023
Published on: Jan 11, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Amiliana Mardiani Soesanto, Estu Rudiktyo, Amin Tjubandi, Rina Ariani, Fadhila Nafilah Azzahra, Mochammad Faisal Adam, Ario Soeryo Kuncoro, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.