Pilot Study of Intelligent Office Blood Pressure Measurement Model in Shanghai, China, 2022
References
- National Bureau of Statistics of China.
Communiqué of the Seventh National Population Census (No. 5) . China: NBS of China; 2021. Available from:http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202105/t20210510_1817190.html - Zhang WL, Cai J. STEP to blood pressure management of elderly hypertension: evidence from Asia. Hypertension Research. 2022; 45(4): 576–582. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00875-7
- Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang L, Wang X, Hao G, Zhang Z, et al. Status of hypertension in China: Results from the China Hypertension Survey, 2012–2015. Circulation. 2018; 137(22): 2344–2356. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380
- Jung MH, Kim GH, Kim JH, Moon KW, Yoo KD, Rho TH, et al. Reliability of home blood pressure monitoring: in the context of validation and accuracy. Blood Press Monit. 2015; 20(4): 215–220. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000121
- Padwal R, Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, Olsen MH, Delles C, Etyang A, et al. Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group. J Hypertens. 2019; 37(9): 1737–1745. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002112
- Wang Y, Chen L, Fu C, Wang Y, An D, Zhang J, et al. Associations between various attended automated office blood pressure estimations and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: Minhang study. J Hypertens. 2020; 38(6): 1072–1079. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002384
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Technical Management Specification of the Auto-Measuring Device for Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in Community-based Health Management for Non-communicable Diseases. T/SMA 0012–2020. Shanghai: Shanghai Metrology Association; 2020.
- Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-A report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019; 16(3): 182–241. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.014
- Meng L, Zhao D, Pan Y, Ding W, Wei Q, Li H, et al. Validation of Omron HBP-1300 professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016; 16: 9. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0177-z
- Cheng MN, Wang YH, Yan QH, Yao HH, Shi Y. Epidemic status of hypertension among residents aged 18 years and older of Shanghai in 2013. China J Hypertens. 2017; 25(5): 451–455.
http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.16439/j.cnki.1673-7245.2017.05.013 - Kottke TE, Anderson JP, Zillhardt JD, Sperl-Hillen JM, O’Connor PJ, Green BB, et al. Association of an automated blood pressure measurement quality improvement program with terminal digit preference and recorded mean blood pressure in 11 Clinics. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(8):
e2229098 . DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29098 - Gozdecki L, Kramer H, Thomas M, Gardezi K, Tarlov E, Hughes A, et al. Protocol to improve hypertension management in a VA outpatient clinic. J Hum Hypertens. 2023; 37(1): 50–55. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00650-0
- Drawz PE, Agarwal A, Dwyer JP, Horwitz E, Lash J, Lenoir K, et al. Concordance between blood pressure in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial and in routine clinical practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180(12): 1655–1663. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5028
- Cheng RZ, Bhalla V, Chang TI. Comparison of routine and automated office blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit. 2019; 24(4): 174–178. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000392
- Parker RA, Paterson M, Padfield P, Pinnock H, Hanley J, Hammersley VS, et al. Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1):
e019431 . DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019431 - Wang Y, Wang Y, Gu H, Qain Y, Zhang J, Tang X, et al. Use of home blood pressure monitoring among hypertensive adults in primary care: Minhang community survey. Blood Press Monit. 2014; 19(3): 140–4. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000035
- Foti KE, Appel LJ, Matsushita K, Coresh J, Alexander GC, Selvin E. Digit preference in office blood pressure measurements, United States 2015–2019. Am J Hypertens. 2021; 34(5): 521–530. DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa196
- Ayodele OE, Sanya EO, Okunola OO, Akintunde AA. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012; 23(2): 85–9. DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2011-045
- Graves JW, Bailey KR, Grossardt BR, Gullerud RE, Meverden RA, Grill DE, et al. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: Evidence for the need of continued observation. Am J Hypertens. 2006; 19(6): 567–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.04.004
- Greiver M, Kalia S, Voruganti T, Aliarzadeh B, Moineddin R, Hinton W, et al. Trends in end digit preference for blood pressure and associations with cardiovascular outcomes in Canadian and UK primary care: A retrospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):
e024970 . DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024970 - Wang Y, Wang Y, Qain Y, Zhang J, Tang X, Sun J, et al. Longitudinal change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with hypertension in primary care clinics: Minhang study. Blood Press Monit. 2015; 20(2): 74–8. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000092
- Alsanjari ON, de Lusignan S, van Vlymen J, Gallagher H, Millett C, Harris K, et al. Trends and transient change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recording: Studies of sequential and longitudinal collected primary care data. Int J Clin Pract. 2012; 66(1): 37–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02781.x
- NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021; 398(10304): 957–980. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1
- Ma J, Tang X, Zhao J, Zhang J, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Intelligent Assist Office Blood Pressures (IOBP) versus awake ambulatory monitoring and conventional auscultatory office readings in Chinese primary medical institutions. Hypertens Res; 2024. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01687-7
- Kjeldsen SE, Mancia G. The un-observed automated office blood pressure measurement technique used in the SPRINT Study Points to a standard target office systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017; 19(1): 3. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-017-0700-y
- Myers MG, Asmar R, Staessen JA. Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century. J Clin Hypertens. 2018; 20(7): 1104–1107. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13276
- Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure – 15 years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens. 2016; 18(8): 721–4. DOI: 10.1111/jch.12820
- O’Brien E, Dolan E, Stergiou GS. Achieving reliable blood pressure measurements in clinical practice: It’s time to meet the challenge. J Clin Hypertens. 2018; 20(7): 1084–1088. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13323
- Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunström M, Burnier M, Grassi G, Januszewicz A, et al. 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J Hypertens. 2023; 41(12): 1874–2071. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1344 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 11, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 13, 2024
Published on: Aug 21, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2024 Guoli Wu, Qinghua Yan, Fernando Martínez-García, Dinesh Neupane, Yuheng Wang, Fei Wu, Cui Wu, Barbara Lee Smith, Yan Shi, Minna Cheng, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.