Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Consort diagram with the total number of participants and losses, number of clusters, monitoring and analysis of study groups.

Table 1

Comparison between students who completed the study protocol and losses.

Variable*Students with complete data (3 time points) (N = 1301)Losses (n = 751)p-value
Sex (female)677 (52)395 (53)0.807
Group0.651
Expository classes (G1)651 (50)357 (48)
Worked Example (G2)650 (50)394 (52)
Schooling<0.001
Elementary school478 (37)145 (19)
Highschool823 (63)606 (81)
Father educational level†0.279
Elementary school (complete or incomplete)528 (44)285 (42)
Highschool (complete or incomplete)319 (27)168 (25)
Superior88 (7)61 (9)
Not informed256 (22)163 (24)
Mother educational level†<0.001
Elementary school (complete or incomplete)532 (43)285 (42)
Highschool (complete or incomplete)441 (35)168 (25)
Superior87 (7)61 (9)
Not informed186 (15)163 (24)
Father income0.429
Up to 1 minimum wage164 (13)106 (15)
1–2 minimum wages220 (18)133 (19)
3–4 minimum wages58 (5)34 (5)
≥5 minimum wages21 (2)17 (3)
Not informed754 (62)400 (58)
Mother income0.456
Up to 1 minimum wage335 (27)189 (27)
1–2 minimum wages201 (16)135 (19)
3–4 minimum wages31 (3)23 (3)
≥5 minimum wages13 (1)9 (1)
Not informed661 (53)361 (50)

[i] * Values expressed as absolute numbers and percentages for each group.

† Father educational level: total answers 1868 (1191 in the group with complete data and 677 in the loss group).

Mother educational level: total answers 1923 (1246 in the group with complete data and 677 in the loss group).

‡ Father income: total answers 1907 (1217 in the group with complete data and 690 in the loss group).

Mother income: total answers 1958 (1241 in the group with complete data and 717 in the loss group).

Figure 2

Proportions of correct answers in the pre-test, immediate and late post-tests for the conventional and experimental groups (primary outcome).

Figure 3

Overall proportions of correct answers by question for children in elementary and high school.

Appendix Figure 1

Proportions of correct answers by individual question for the conventional and experimental groups.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.347 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2019
Accepted on: May 13, 2020
Published on: Jun 17, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Kaciane K. B. Oliveira, Bruno R. Nascimento, Andrea Z. Beaton, Maria Carmo P. Nunes, José Luiz P. Silva, Lara C. Rabelo, Márcia M. Barbosa, Cássio M. Oliveira, Mariana D. Mata, Waydder Antônio A. Costa, Augusto F. Pereira, Craig A. Sable, Antonio L. P. Ribeiro, On behalf of the PROVAR investigators, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.