Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Meta-Analysis of the Incidence, Prevalence, and Correlates of Atrial Fibrillation in Rheumatic Heart Disease Cover

Meta-Analysis of the Incidence, Prevalence, and Correlates of Atrial Fibrillation in Rheumatic Heart Disease

Open Access
|May 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic heart disease by WHO region.

Figure 2

Meta-analysis of the incidence of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic heart disease.

Table 1

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the global population with rheumatic heart disease.

Prevalence, %95% Confidence intervalN StudiesN ParticipantsHeterogeneityP Egger testP value comparisonMeta-regression
I2, %P valueR2, %P value for testing of moderators
Global32.828.1–37.76943,05999.0<0.0001<0.0001
· Low risk of bias studies34.725.3–44.8204,81998.0< 0.00010.257
By WHO region50.4<0.0001
· Europe50.143.1–57.1168,50397.3<0.00010.010<0.0001
· Western Pacific45.936.9–55.1113,88096.4<0.00010.467
· Eastern Mediterranean33.623.0–45.2102,36196.6<0.00010.863
· Americas25.113.6–38.8664492.7<0.00010.127
· South-East Asia22.917.1–29.31822,46198.9<0.00010.001
· Africa12.68.5–17.571,86787.9<0.00010.703
By level of human development index57.6<0.0001
· Very high45.438.7–52.31810,49897.8<0.00010.120<0.0001
· High41.935.5–48.3225,03295.0<0.00010.760
· Medium21.116.6–26.02326,00698.5<0.00010.015
· Low13.28.2–19.461,52389.8<0.00010.092
By endemic status24.50.0001
· Endemic area22.818.5–27.33328,60598.5<0.00010.002<0.0001
· Non-endemic area42.838.1–47.63614,45496.8<0.00010.205
By surgery valvular intervention status3.90.025
· Before valvular intervention28.422.7–34.44027,69099.0<0.00010.00050.026
· After valvular intervention39.331.8–47.02915,36998.8<0.00010.008
Type of valvular interventions
- Valve replacement60.348.6–71.5460387.0<0.00010.7010.0001
- Valvuloplasty39.530.6–48.8103,12295.7<0.00010.503
- Valvulotomy28.219.8–37.3119,46798.5<0.00010.107
By age group35.0<0.0001
· Children and adolescents7.61.9–16.8249687.80.004NA<0.0001
· Children, adolescents, and adults20.514.2–27.51523,60999.2<0.00010.073
· Adolescents and adults26.217.3–36.361,77494.2<0.00010.027
· Adults39.734.4–45.14617,18098.0<0.00010.021
By study period7.00.026
· Before 200038.230.2–46.53527,82599.4<0.0001< 0.00010.022
· 2000 or after27.322.7–32.23415,23497.4<0.00010.196

[i] R2: amount of heterogeneity accounted for; NA: not applicable.

Table 2

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the global population with rheumatic heart disease according to clinical presentation.

Prevalence, %95% Confidence intervalN StudiesN ParticipantsHeterogeneityP Egger testP value comparison
I2, %P value
Severity overall
· Severe valvular disease30.824.0–38.23214,04998.6<0.00010.0270.009
· Moderate/mild valvular disease20.717.1–24.61454NANANA
Severe valvular disease by valve
· Severe mitral disease30.423.6–37.6183,62794.7<0.00010.1650.038
· Severe aortic disease6.30.0–26.923960.50.112NA
Mitral valve disease
· Mixed mitral disease65.642.5–85.4444994.7<0.00010.4610.011
· Mitral stenosis33.928.5–39.44217,22198.1<0.00010.005
· Mitral regurgitation21.67.8–39.7688096.6<0.00010.528
Aortic valve disease
· Mixed aortic disease3.60.8–8.11110NANANA0.694
· Aortic stenosis5.00.0–20.2120NANANA
· Aortic regurgitation5.80.6–14.4318058.30.0910.398

[i] NA: not applicable.

Figure 3

Panel A. Comparison of mean age between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel B. Comparison of tricuspid valve involvement between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel C. Comparison of previous cerebrovascular event* between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel D. Comparison of advanced heart failure** between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel E. Highly sensitive C reactive protein concentration (mg/dL).

Figure 4

Panel A. Comparison of systolic pulmonary artery pressure between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel B. Comparison of right atrium pressure between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel C. Comparison of left atrium diameter between RHD patients with and without AF; Panel D. Comparison of left ventricle ejection fraction between RHD patients with and without AF.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.807 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 16, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 16, 2020
Published on: May 18, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Jean Jacques Noubiap, Ulrich Flore Nyaga, Aude Laetitia Ndoadoumgue, Jan René Nkeck, Anderson Ngouo, Jean Joel Bigna, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.