Noninvasive Assessment of the Fractional Flow Reserve with the CT FFRc 1D Method: Final Results of a Pilot Study
By: Daria Gognieva, Yulia Mitina, Timur Gamilov, Roman Pryamonosov, Yuriy Vasilevskii, Sergey Simakov, Fuyou Liang, Sergey Ternovoy, Natalya Serova, Ekaterina Tebenkova, Valentin Sinitsyn, Ekaterina Pershina, Sergey Abugov, Gaik Mardanian, Narek Zakarian, Vardan Kirakosian, Vladimir Betelin, Dmitry Shchekochikhin, Abram Syrkin and Philippe Kopylov
References
- Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms. Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 19: 1889–1997. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
- Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve from Anatomic CT Angiography. JAMA. 2012; 12: 1237–1245. DOI: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274
- Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. The NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. The NXT Trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 12: 1145–1155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043
- Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients with Suspected Coronary Disease. The PLATFORM Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 5: 435–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057
- Benton MS, Tesche C, De Cecco NC, et al. Noninvasive Derivation of Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography. A Review. Thorac Imaging. 2018; 33(2): 88–96. DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000289
- Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Baumann S, et al. Coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve: Machine learning algorithm versus computational fluid dynamics modeling. Radiology. 2018; 288(1): 64–72. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171291
- Simakov SS, Gamilov TM, Kopylov FY, et al. Evaluation of the hemodynamic significance of stenosis in multiple lesions of the coronary vessels using mathematical modeling. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2016; 162(7): 128–132. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-016-3558-0
- Gognieva D, Gamilov T, Pryamonosov R, et al. One-Dimensional Mathematical Model-Based Automated Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve in a Patient with Silent Myocardial Ischemia. Am J Case Rep. 2018; 19: 724–728. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.908449
- Pershina ES, Sinitsin VE, Mershina EA, et al. Non-invasive FFR derived from standard acquired coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets (FFRCT) for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD): First data of clinical use. Comparison with invasive measurement. Medical Visualization. 2018; (2): 47–55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-2018-2-47-55
- Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(3): 307–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010
- Gaur S, Taylor CA, Jensen JM, et al. FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in nonculprit lesions of patients with recent STEMI. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017; 10: 424–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.05.019
- Gamilov T, Kopylov P, Simakov S. Computational simulations of fractional flow reserve variability. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. 2016; 112: 499–507. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39929-4_48
- Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Value of a Novel Noninvasive Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Method Versus Standard Coronary Angiography for Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014 114: 1303–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.064
- Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Computed from Noninvasive CT Angiography Data: Diagnostic Performance of an On-Site Clinicianoperated Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm. Radiology. 2015; 274: 674–83. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140992
- Ko BS, Cameron JD, Munnur RK, et al. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: 663–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.07.005
- Kruk M, Wardziak Ł, Demkow M, et al. Workstation-based calculation of CTAbased FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9(6): 690–699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.019
- Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 18(4): 432–440. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew094
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.837 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2020
Published on: Jan 4, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2021 Daria Gognieva, Yulia Mitina, Timur Gamilov, Roman Pryamonosov, Yuriy Vasilevskii, Sergey Simakov, Fuyou Liang, Sergey Ternovoy, Natalya Serova, Ekaterina Tebenkova, Valentin Sinitsyn, Ekaterina Pershina, Sergey Abugov, Gaik Mardanian, Narek Zakarian, Vardan Kirakosian, Vladimir Betelin, Dmitry Shchekochikhin, Abram Syrkin, Philippe Kopylov, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.