Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Psychosocial Risk Factors in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Time to Screen Beyond Anxiety and Depression Cover

Psychosocial Risk Factors in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Time to Screen Beyond Anxiety and Depression

Open Access
|Feb 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Psychocardiogram (Set of questionnaires).

Risk factorPsychometric assessmentTime to administer (min)Clinical cut-off usedCronbach-α
DepressionHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 7 items (depression)5Sum score >10.839
AnxietyHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 7 items (anxiety)5Sum score >10.826
Anger/HostiiityMinnesota Multiphasic Personality inventory (MMPI)-2; 23 items (cynicism subscaie)5Z-score > 1 SD.898
Type D PatternDS 14; 14 items (7 items Negative Affectivity (NA); 7 items Social Inhibition (SI))5NA s 10 andSI > 10.869 (NA), .880 (SI)
Vital ExhaustionMaastricht Vital Exhaustion Questionnaire; 9 items5Sum Score s 11.836
Lack of Social SupportENRICHED Social Support Instrument (ESSI); 7 items10Sum Score < 18.911
Chronic Work StressEffort-Reward Imbalance (ERI); 23 items (6 items Effort (E); 11 items Reward (R); 6 items Overcommitment (OC))5E/R*0.545454 > 1 Z-Score > 1 SD.843 (E) .920 (R) .827 (OC)
Figure 1

Screening procedure.

Table 2

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients included in the study (n = 609).

VariablePatients (%)
Age* (years)60.7 ± 10.9
Male gender,84.9
Main diagnosis,
Heart failure12
Coronary artery disease (CAD)82.7
CAD and peripheral artery disease (PAD)5.3
CR program,
CHF11.9
DiaFit2.4
Women1.5
PAD5.2
Seniors13.1
Standard65.9
Affected vessels,
No affected vessels2
One-vessel disease34.8
Two-vessel disease23.1
Three-vessel disease33.1
N/A7
Figure 2

Screening process.

Figure 3

Percentage of patients with elevated scores per scale (n = 474).

Table 3

Sample characteristics of patients stratified by their participation in a psychological counseling with regard to identified psychosocial risk factors.

VariableFollowing invitation discussion of the PCG-ProfileP Value*
Yes (n = 120)No (n = 107)
Age, M ± SD, y59.4 ± 10.160.3 ± 11.3.569
Male gender, %78.388.8.035
Affected vessels, %.076
One-vessel disease35.340.2
Two-vessel disease28.415.5
Three-vessel disease36.244.3
LVEF < 40%, %20.816.8.441
Acute coronary syndrome, %63.362.3.868
Depression score, M ± SD6.2 ± 3.67.0 ± 4.3.155
Anxiety score, M ± SD7.6 ± 3.97.7 ± 4.0.777
Vital exhaustion score, M ± SD10.7 ± 4.810.2 ± 5.3.504
Social support score, M ± SD26.7 ± 6.826.2 ± 7.1.582
Effort-reward-imbalance score, M ± SD0.7 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.3.053
Overcommitment score, M ± SD15.4 ± 4.115.2 ± 4.5.826
Hostility score, M ± SD10.1 ± 6.412.0 ± 6.2.028
Type D personality, %50.052.4.722

[i] M: Mean.

SD: Standard Deviation * P < 0.005.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.896 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 7, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 14, 2021
Published on: Feb 19, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Cristina Mesa-Vieira, Johannes Grolimund, Roland von Känel, Oscar H. Franco, Hugo Saner, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.