Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Delivery Model for Chronic Patients with Multi-Morbidity in the Basque Country Cover

Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Delivery Model for Chronic Patients with Multi-Morbidity in the Basque Country

Open Access
|Aug 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Primary care nurses. Proposals for improvement.

ThemesRankingCoefficient of variationSpontaneity
Shared health record5.000.05
Team work between specialised care, primary care and social services (protocols, care, discussion, etc)5.000.07
Motivation, commitment, and the taking on of responsibility among professionals5.000.04
More resources4.670.114
Efforts to improve communication with patients4.220.164
More information for staff about the model and continuity of the model4.220.22
Remote consultations between clinicians4.220.21
Assigned clinicians3.890.243
Project champion, to manage conflicts and resistance in the integrated health organization3.630.311
Data on clinical outcomes by doctor’s list3.560.251
Videoconferences3.110.411
Table 2

Hospital nurses. Proposals for improvement.

ThemesRankingCoefficient of variationSpontaneity
Internists to take on their role as case managers4.860.081
Unification of criteria for action (establishment of protocols for actions, etc.)4.860.084
Greater commitment from all levels of care4.860.083
Reinstatement of the figures of the advanced practice nurse case manager and liaison nurse in primary care, or taking on of corresponding functions by a primary care nurse4.860.083
More staff, to avoid work overload4.570.173
Differentiation of the tasks of each professional4.570.122
Information technology tools to simplify record-keeping4.000.142
Simpler model, based on protocols, that cover more patients (beyond those with multiple health problems)3.860.311
Grouping patients with multiple chronic health problems on specific doctor’s lists3.290.291
Table 3

General practitioners. Proposals for improvement.

ThemesRankingCoefficient of variationSpontaneity
Development of protocols and standardisation of healthcare with shared goals, deprescribing5.000.0015
Commitment of the internist: he/she should be a clinical leader and really want the role4.860.085
Joint training – criteria for stability/instability Communication, communication and communication4.710.164
Establishment of flexible mechanisms to facilitate communication across the organisation (setting aside time, regular meetings between levels of care, joint meetings)4.710.17
Definition of tasks and roles4.570.129
Strengthening the role of patients and their families within the programme for patients with multiple chronic diseases4.140.094
Real development of information technology tools and electronic health records with automatic reminders and prompts4.140.172
Development of the skills of primary care nurses for monitoring patients with multiple chronic diseases4.140.172
Coordination with hospital-at-home services4.140.262
Encouragement of a greater involvement of general practitioners in the project4.140.171
Integration with social services4.000.141
Minimisation of unnecessary hospitalisation at home3.860.231
Up-to-date records of patients with multiple chronic diseases in the integrated health organisation, discharge criteria3.710.201
Liaison nurse pursuing the goals of specialised and primary care3.710.201
Management prioritisation of programs, so that they can be addressed properly3.570.151
Access by primary care staff to records of hospital follow-up of patients with multiple chronic diseases3.140.291
Table 4

Internal medicine specialists. Proposals for improvement.

ThemesRankingCoefficient of variationSpontaneity
More resources tailored to needs4.250.245
Listening to clinicians from the organisation at the planning stage4.000.272
Definition of priorities [defining roles in a realistic way, distinguishing care of patients with multiple chronic diseases from routine practice)3.750.374
Official recognition within the organisation of the model and the professionals involved3.750.311
Implementation of equivalent models in all the integrated healthcare organisations3.750.241
Strengthening the interaction between levels of care: joint sessions, communication3.250.141
Sharing of data on the results of the project3.250.391
Being realistic about the expected results3.000.361
Greater commitment by “some” general practitioners2.880.291
Inclusion of internists on the hospital-at-home team2.750.321
Improvement in the provision of care in the emergency department and its relationship with the hospital-at-home service2.630.351
Encouragement of remote consultations between clinicians2.500.371
Prioritisation of programs: “everybody complies with a clear business plan”2.000.401
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1975 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 5, 2014
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2016
Published on: Aug 19, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 María Luz Jauregui, Carmen Silvestre, Pedro Valdes, Idoia Gaminde, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.