Table 1
Keywords and research databases used in systematic searches.
| Keywords | Databases (from 2000 – week 3 to July 2017) |
|---|---|
| “Family Physician” | MEDLINE (OVID) |
| “General Practice” | CINAHL (OVID) |
| “Primary Care” | EMBASE |
| “Dietitians” | Epistemonikos |
| “Laboratory staff” | PSYCHINFO |
| “Medical laboratory personnel” | Web of Science |
| “Medical secretaries” | |
| “Nurses” | |
| “Nutritionists” | |
| “Occupational therapists” | |
| “Physical therapists” | |
| “Social workers” | |
| “Pharmacists” |

Figure 1
Search flow for multiprofessional collaboration in primary care involving general practitioners experiences.
Table 2
Study design and distribution of participants.
| Mixed methods* (N = 6) | Qualitative (N = 10) | Quantitative (N = 3) | Total (N = 19) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPs/physicians | 334 | 61 | 1,663 | 2,058 |
| Nurses§ | 1,017 | 68 | 789 | 1,874 |
| CPWs | 519 | 519 | ||
| Physiotherapists | 28 | 28 | ||
| Secretaries/lab. assistants | 21 | 21 | ||
| Patients | 474 | 179 | 554 | 1,207 |
[i] GP: General practitioner; CPW: Child protection worker.
* One study did not report the distribution of responders among GPs, HCNs and municipal case managers (n = 32) (35).
§ Includes HCNs, managers in homecare services and cancer coordinators.
Table 3
Organisational, processual, relational and contextual facilitators of MPC in primary care.
Organisational facilitators of multi-professional collaboration
|
Processual facilitators of multi-professional collaboration
|
Relational and contextual facilitators of multi-professional collaboration
|
