Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A new model of care collaboration for community-dwelling elders: findings and lessons learned from the NORC-health care linkage evaluation Cover

A new model of care collaboration for community-dwelling elders: findings and lessons learned from the NORC-health care linkage evaluation

Open Access
|May 2011

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Community chronic care model.

Table 1. 

Description of funded linkage communities

NORC-SSP siteNORC communityStaffingNORC health care partner (existing)Linkage focal point (new)
Mid-ManhattanA coalition of a public housing complex and a moderate-income cooperative on Manhattan’s Upper West Side where more than 800 of the approximately 3200 residents are seniors. Senior residents are primarily Black and Hispanic (76% combined). NORC-SSP established in 2000Two and a half full-time social workers, one full-time nurseLocal hospitalEmergency Department of local hospital partner, and local pharmacies
Lower ManhattanA public housing project on Manhattan’s Lower East Side with 27 buildings, 3000 residents, 860 of whom are seniors. The senior population is diverse: 59% Hispanic; 22% Asian; 14% White; 5% Black. NORC-SSP established in 1993Four full-time social workers, one part-time nurse (3 day/week)Certified home care agencyLocal primary care clinic
QueensA moderate income garden apartment cooperative in northeast Queens, home to more than 4000 residents, 1000 of whom are seniors. Senior residents are overwhelmingly White. NORC-SSP established in 2000Two full-time social workers, and a 75% time nurse (4 days/week)Local hospitalCommunity physicians affiliated with local hospital partner
BrooklynA large, primarily low-income rental housing complex in an isolated part of southern Brooklyn, with 46 buildings, 14,000 residents, 2700 of whom are seniors. The senior population is diverse: 44% Black; 41% White; 15% Hispanic and a growing Russian population. NORC-SSP established in 2000Three full-time social workers, one full-time nurseLocal hospitalCommunity physicians
Table 2. 

Primary linkage interventions: systematic sharing of information

NORC-SSP siteTarget conditionDescription of systematic sharing of information
Mid-ManhattanTransition from ED to community• Daily email list of ED discharges within the NORC-SSP catchment area
• Electronic medication record housed by and updates by local pharmacies
Lower ManhattanDiabetes• Shared Electronic Patient Database with diagnostic, treatment and appointment information
QueensFalls• Consultation letter from NORC-SSP to PCPs with results from the Hartford Falls Risk Assessment Protocol and recommendations for treatment and/or referral
BrooklynDepression• Shared Client Passport with results from the Hamilton Depression Screening Protocol and notes on all medical and social work visits
Table 3. 

Increased awareness of partner services

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• Seventy-one percent of ED staff correctly identified the NORC program, its services and client eligibility
• One hundred percent of ED staff correctly reported the MyMeds program purpose
• Eighty-six percent of ED staff correctly identified MyMeds partners
• Ninety-three percent ED docs were able to correctly report how to identify a MyMeds member
Lower ManhattanSeventy-four percent of primary care physicians working in diabetes at the primary care center were aware of the Lower Manhattan NORC, and 63% of the joint diabetes Linkage project
Queens• Twelve formal presentations were made by the NORC-SSP for community physicians (3–4 per quarter)
• On average, 24 community physicians attended each presentation
BrooklynAnecdotal evidence (i.e. increases in documented communication between NORC-SSP and physicians during the Linkage project) suggests increased awareness
Table 4. 

Increased communication among partners

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• On average 117 contacts per quarter, 28% related to medications
• On average 8% of all contacts with the NORC program were initiated by a pharmacy per quarter
Lower Manhattan• Eighty-four patient-related contacts documented for the 39 test patients; of those, 15 were referrals from the primary care center to the NORC program, 12 were new referrals for home care services, and 15 involved self-management plan interventions
Queens• Approximately 30 contacts (telephone, fax, in person) between the NORC-SSP and community physicians per quarter; increasing percentage initiated by the community physicians (20% on average, per quarter),
• NORC-SSP communicated with 39 different community physicians during the project
Brooklyn• Over 50 patient-related contacts per quarter (over 200 by the end of the implementation year for 45 enrolled patients) with 34 participating community physicians
• Increasing number initiated by community physicians (11% by the end of the implementation year)
Table 5. 

Increased identification of residents in need

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• One hundred percent of ED visits by participating residents enrolled in the MyMeds program were reported to the NORC-SSP
• Approximately 30% of the (100) enrollees were new to the NORC-SSP
Lower Manhattan• All enrollees received at least one intervention (e.g. home care referrals, NORC nurse visit, phone reminders, etc.) through the integrated diabetes assessment program, with many receiving multiple interventions
Queens• Approximately 100 client assessments or reassessments were conducted by NORC-SSP staff (approx. 25 per quarter) using the Hartford Falls Risk Assessment protocol
• Approximately 70% of those clients assessed for falls risk were determined to be at risk and in need of intervention
Brooklyn• Approximately one-quarter of all participating residents reported that their physician or physician office staff asked if they were a client of the Brooklyn-based NORC at the time of an office visit
Table 6. 

Increased shared care planning

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• Providers reached out to the NORC-SSP to get information on shared patients or to find out how to enroll other patients into the Linkage project
Lower Manhattan• Fifty-two collaborative assessments of diabetes status conducted for the target patients over the course of the year
• Quarterly group visits at the primary care center drew approximately 5 NORC program clients each time
• Fifty-six percent of residents report seeing the NORC-SSP and the primary care center staff work together to assist them in their diabetes treatment
Queens• Providers responded to assessment findings and care plan recommendations that were sent by the NORC-SSP nurse or presented by the resident
• Residents reported that physicians began asking them about mobility issues and falls
Brooklyn• Twenty-four percent residents reported that their physicians either looked or wrote in the client passport
Table 7. 

Increased continuity of care

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• Shared medication information led to sharing of other health information across providers
• By the end of the implementation year, 14 pharmacies had joined the MyMeds network
Lower Manhattan• All diabetes linkage program enrollees visited a doctor during the implementation year
• Forty-eight percent missed appointments in 2005, only 27% missed appointments in 2006, a 45% reduction
Queens• By the end of the implementation year, the majority of residents surveyed were able to identify falls risks
• Increased number of residents report telling their physician about a fall (38% in the 1st quarter, 50% in the 4th)
• Increased number of residents made a change to prevent a fall (53% in the 1st quarter; 67% in the 4th)
• Fewer participants reported a fear of falling (35% in 1st quarter, 20% in 4th)
• Fewer participants reported discomfort speaking with providers about falls
Brooklyn• Increased comfort talking to physicians about emotional health issues (from 12% in 1st quarter to 43% in 4th)
• Increased comfort talking to NORC-SSP staff about emotional health issues (from 27% in 1st quarter; 47% in 4th)
• Increased numbers of clients reported showing their passports or NORC-SSP chart stickers to physicians over time (10% in 1st quarter; 30% in 4th)
Table 8. 

Improved care outcomes

SiteEvidence
Mid-Manhattan• Number of ED revisits at 30 days decreased from the beginning of the implementation year to the end, from 21% of all ED visits to 5%
Lower Manhattan• By the end of the implementation year, enrollees were showing improved levels of A1c (14% increase in number of enrollees with A1c <7), blood pressure (19% increase in number of enrollees with blood pressure <130/80) and LDL (12% increase in enrollees with an LDL <100), and were getting a greater number of annual eye (10% increase) and foot exams (38% increase)8
Queens• Hartford assessment scores improved over the four quarters (approx. 60% decreased risk; approx. 30% stabilized risk; approx. 10% increased risk)
Brooklyn• Improved emotional health status doubled (from 41% in 1st quarter to 88% in 4th)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.518 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Published on: May 9, 2011
Published by: Igitur publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2011 Corinne Kyriacou, Fredda Vladeck, published by Igitur publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.