Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Glaucoma Community Care: Does Ongoing Shared Care Work? Cover

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic details of the study patients.

CharacteristicTotal sample (n = 266)Ophthalmology-led care group (n = 81)Shared care group (n = 185)P-value
Age, years
   Mean (SD)62 (12)60 (13)62 (12)0.276      
   Range23–8623–8625–86
Sex, n (%)
   Male170 (64%)53 (65%)117 (63%)0.782      
   Female96 (36%)28 (35%)68 (37%)
Ethnicity, n (%)
   Caucasian150 (56%)46 (57%)104 (56%)0.894      
   Asian83 (31%)24 (30%)59 (32%)
   Other33 (12%)11 (14%)22 (12%)
Baseline refraction
   Spherical equivalent, mean (SD)–0.7 (2.5)–1.0 (2.7)–0.6 (2.5)0.742      
   Myopia < –1, n (%)87 (34%)24 (32%)63 (35%)0.667      
   Myopia < –3, n (%)42 (16%)16 (21%)26 (14%)0.196      
Baseline maximum IOP in both eyes, mmHg
   Mean (SD)19 (5)20 (5)19 (5)0.070      
   Range8–3410–348–33
   IOP ≥ 2278 (29%)30 (37%)48 (26%)0.079      
   IOP < 22188 (71%)51 (63%)137 (74%)
Baseline thinnest CCT in both eyes, µm
   Mean (SD)548 (34)547 (36)549 (33)0.381      
   Range452–656452–635454–656
   CCT < 555151 (57%)48 (59%)103 (56%)0.687      
   CCT ≥ 555115 (43%)33 (41%)82 (44%)
Baseline glaucoma severity§
   Suspect or OHT110 (43%)20 (26%)90 (51%)<0.001***
   Early89 (35%)22 (29%)67 (38%)
   Moderate10 (4%)6 (8%)4 (2%)
   Advanced46 (18%)29 (38%)17 (10%)
Primary prescribed therapy, n (%)
   Prostaglandin analogue112 (68%)38 (61%)74 (72%)0.475      
   Laser (SLT or PI)23 (14%)9 (15%)14 (14%)
   Alpha-agonist3 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
   Beta-blocker3 (2%)1 (2%)2 (2%)
   Combination24 (15%)13 (21%)11 (11%)
Initial recommended review period
   <3 months108 (47%)38 (54%)70 (44%)0.061      
   3–5 months30 (13%)13 (19%)17 (11%)
   6–8 months83 (36%)17 (24%)66 (42%)
   9–12 months7 (3%)2 (3%)5 (3%)

[i] Includes four individuals of African descent.

Missing values: 11.

§ Missing values: 12.

Missing values: 38; Advanced glaucoma was defined as a visual field mean deviation worse than –12dB, or three or more points with an abnormal probability score of less than 2% within the central ten degrees. Further data on the severity of visual field defects using mean deviation alone is presented in Figure 2D.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; OHT, ocular hypertension; PI, peripheral iridotomy; SD, standard deviation; SLT, selective laser trabeculoplasty.

Figure 1

Distribution of all patients enrolled in the scheme. Patients were categorised as suitable for shared care if at least one of their follow up consultations over the three-year study period was conducted in the optometry-led clinic.

Abbreviations: GMC, glaucoma management clinic.

Figure 2

Key differences between the groups of patients suitable and unsuitable for shared care: A) The blue and green vertical dotted lines indicate the median of 5 and 6 visits for the ophthalmology-led care only and shared care groups, respectively. B) Baseline diagnosis and C) Management across the two groups D) Patients in ophthalmology-led care showed a poorer worse eye Humphrey visual fields mean deviation median (interquartile range) of –3.70 (5.19) dB compared to –1.58 (3.18) dB for the shared care group.

Abbreviations: dB, decibels; NTG, normal tension glaucoma; OHT, ocular hypertension; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; SOAG, secondary open angle glaucoma.

Figure 3

Flowchart illustrating the direction of patient flow across all 1,490 attendances required for the 266 patients included in the study. Almost half (46%) of all follow up assessments were seen by optometrists only; either in optometry-led clinic or as a short subsequent consultation. Based on follow up attendances only, the re-referral rate to ophthalmology in the GMC was 21% (260 attendances).

Abbreviations: GMC, glaucoma management clinic.

Table 2

Cross tabulation of the diagnosis versus action plan across all appointments where a specific review period was applicable (n = 1,348).

DiagnosisTreatedManagement planRecommended review period
<3 months3–5 months6–8 months9–12 monthsTotal
SuspectUntreatedStop treatment1031014
No treatment94113760247
TreatedStart treatment10001
Continue treatment0217322
OHTUntreatedStop treatment11002
No treatment316521384
TreatedStart treatment40206
Continue treatment1524030
Change treatment20002
NTGUntreatedNo treatment10001
TreatedStart treatment4921052
Continue treatment19943103426
Change treatment4595059
POAGUntreatedStop treatment11002
No treatment12003
TreatedStart treatment3720039
Continue treatment17631581239
Change treatment3745046
SOAGTreatedStart treatment51006
Continue treatment51437056
Change treatment812011
1348

[i] Abbreviations: NTG, normal tension glaucoma; OHT, ocular hypertension; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; SOAG, secondary open angle glaucoma.

Figure 4

Frequency histograms for the key outcome measures of the study: there was no statistically significant difference between the ophthalmology-led care and shared care groups in A) timeliness of follow up appointments, after removing outliers, B) change in IOP with treatment, or C) visual fields mean deviation progression rates among the worse eye. Shaded in green are 7 subjects that showed a fast visual fields mean deviation progression rate (worse than –1dB/year).

Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5470 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2020
Published on: Aug 7, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Angelica Ly, Elizabeth Wong, Jessie Huang, Michael Yapp, Katherine Masselos, Michael Hennessy, Michael Kalloniatis, Barbara Zangerl, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.