Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Let’s Try Social Prescribing in Sweden (SPiS) – an Interventional Project Targeting Loneliness among Older Adults Using a Model for Integrated Care: A Research Protocol Cover

Let’s Try Social Prescribing in Sweden (SPiS) – an Interventional Project Targeting Loneliness among Older Adults Using a Model for Integrated Care: A Research Protocol

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Araujo de Carvalho I, Epping-Jordan J, Pot AM, Kelley E, Toro N, Thiyagarajan JA, et al. Organizing integrated health-care services to meet older people’s needs. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017; 95(11): 75663. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.16.187617
  2. Gebremariam KM, Sadana R. On the ethics of healthy ageing: setting impermissible trade-offs relating to the health and well-being of older adults on the path to universal health coverage. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2019; 18(1): 140. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0997-z
  3. Nyqvist F, Cattan M, Conradsson M, Näsman M, Gustafsson Y. Prevalence of loneliness over ten years among the oldest old. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2017; 45(4): 4118. DOI: 10.1177/1403494817697511
  4. Burström B, Burström K, Nilsson G, Tomson G, Whitehead M, Winblad U. Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2017; 16(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0524-z
  5. Pescheny JV, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence. European journal of public health, 2020; 30(4): 66473. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz078
  6. Dahlberg L, Andersson L, McKee KJ, Lennartsson C. Predictors of loneliness among older women and men in Sweden: A national longitudinal study. Aging & Mental Health, 2015; 19(5): 40917. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2014.944091
  7. Levasseur M, Dubois M-F, Filliatrault J, Vasiliadis H-M, Lacasse-Bédard J, Tourigny A, et al. Effect of personalised citizen assistance for social participation [APIC] on older adults’ health and social participation: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial [RCT]. BMJ Open, 2018; 8(3): e018676. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018676
  8. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ open, 2017; 7(4): e013384-e. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384
  9. Chatterjee HJ. Social prescribing: community-based referral in public health. Perspectives in Public Health, 2017; 138(1): 189. DOI: 10.1177/1757913917736661
  10. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith T, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2015; 10(2): 22737. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614568352
  11. Pels F, Kleinert J. Loneliness and physical activity: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2016; 9(1): 23160. DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2016.1177849
  12. Shankar A, McMunn A, Banks J, Steptoe A. Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. American Psychological Association, 2011; 37785. DOI: 10.1037/a0022826
  13. Nilsson I, Fisher A. Evaluating leisure activities in the oldest old. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2006; 13(1): 317. DOI: 10.1080/11038120500360655
  14. Nilsson I, Löfgren B, Fisher A, Bernspång B. Focus on Leisure Repertoire in the Oldest Old: The Umeå 85+ Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2016; 25(5): 391405. DOI: 10.1177/0733464806292861
  15. Nilsson I, Häggström Lundevaller E, Fisher A. The Reationship between Engagement in Leisure Activities and Self-Rated Health in Later Life. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 2017; 41(2): 17590. DOI: 10.1080/01924788.2017.1306384
  16. Savage RD, Stall NM, Rochon PA. Looking Before We Leap: Building the Evidence for Social Prescribing for Lonely Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [JAGS], 2020; 68(2): 42931. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16251
  17. Bertotti M, Frostick C, Hutt P, Sohanpal R, Carnes D. A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 2018; 19(3): 23245. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423617000706
  18. Savage RD, Stall NM, Rochon PA. Looking Before We Leap: Building the Evidence for Social Prescribing for Lonely Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020; 68(2): 42931. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16251
  19. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open, 2017; 7(4): e013384. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384
  20. Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2018; 26(2): 14757. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12367
  21. Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health, 2013; 13(1): 568. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-568
  22. Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, Penn L, O’brien N. Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open; 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015203
  23. Chatterjee HJ, Camic PM, Lockyer B, Thomson LJM. Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes. Arts & Health, 2018; 10(2): 97123. DOI: 10.1080/17533015.2017.1334002
  24. Polley M, Bertotti B, Kimberlee R, Pilkington KCR. A review of the evidence assessing impact of social prescribing on healthcare demand and cost implications. University of Westminister; 2017.
  25. Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Evaluating the Implementation and Delivery of a Social Prescribing Intervention: A Research Protocol. International journal of integrated care, 2018; 18(1): 13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3087
  26. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 2015; 350: h1258. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258
  27. Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Medicine, 2016; 14(1): undefined-undefined. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1
  28. Lindberg J, Lundgren AS. Positioning the ageing subject: articulations of choice in Swedish and UK health and social care. Policy Studies, 2019; 119. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1599839
  29. Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-science-of-evaluation. DOI: 10.4135/9781473913820
  30. Manzano A. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 2016; 22(3): 34260. DOI: 10.1177/1356389016638615
  31. Mukumbang FC, Marchal B, Van Belle S, van Wyk B. A realist approach to eliciting the initial programme theory of the antiretroviral treatment adherence club intervention in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018; 18(1): 47. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0503-0
  32. Hammersley M. Ethnography: principles in practice. Fourth edition. ed. Atkinson P, editor: London: Routledge; 2019. DOI: 10.4324/9781315146027
  33. Westbrook DA. Navigators of the contemporary: why ethnography matters. Chicago: Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226887531.001.0001
  34. Savage J. Ethnography and health care. BMJ, 2000; 321(3): 14002. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400
  35. Glynos J. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. In: Howarth D, Howarth DR, editors. London New York, NY, London: Routledge; 2007.
  36. World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 2013; 310: 21914. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  37. Gough D. An introduction to systematic reviews. In: Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J, editors. Los Angeles, Ca: SAGE; 2012.
  38. Morgan DL. Focus group kit.: Vol. 1, The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 1998. DOI: 10.4135/9781483328164
  39. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. 2nd edition. ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2017. DOI: 10.4135/9781071802878
  40. Kane M, Trochim WMK. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation: SAGE Publications. Inc; 2007. DOI: 10.4135/9781412983730
  41. Trochim WMK. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1989; 12(1): 116. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5
  42. Rosas SR, Rosas SR. Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence. Quality & quantity, 2017; 51(3): 140316. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0340-3
  43. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006; 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  44. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale [Version 3]: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1996; 66(1): 20. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
  45. Cattan M, White M, Bond J, Learmouth A. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing and society, 2005; 25(1): 4167. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X04002594
  46. Henriksson M, Carlsson P. Att mäta hälsorelaterad livskvalitet: en beskrivning av instrumentet EQ-5D: Linköping CMT; 2002.
  47. Jenkinson C, Layte R. Development and testing of the UK SF-12. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1997; 2(1): 148. DOI: 10.1177/135581969700200105
  48. Resnick B, Nahm ES. Reliability and validity testing of the revised 12-item Short-Form Health Survey in older adults. J Nurs Meas, 2001; 9(2): 15161. DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.9.2.151
  49. Nilsson I, Bernspång B, Fisher AG, Gustafson Y, Löfgren B. Occupational engagement and life satisfaction in the oldest-old: the Umeå 85+ Study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 2007; 27(4): 1319. DOI: 10.1177/153944920702700403
  50. Nilsson I, Löfgren B, Fisher AG, Bernspång B. Focus on Leisure Repertoire in the Oldest Old: The Umeå 85+ Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2006; 25(5): 391405. DOI: 10.1177/0733464806292861
  51. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. 9/Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS]: Recent Evidence and Development of a Shorter Version. Clinical Gerontologist, 1986; 5(1–2): 16573. DOI: 10.1300/J018v05n01_09
  52. Wynn D, Williams CK. Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 2012; 36(3): 787810. DOI: 10.2307/41703481
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5609 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 4, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2021
Published on: Jun 22, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Erika Johansson, Frida Jonsson, Emil Rapo, Anna-Sofia Lundgren, Åsa Hörnsten, Ingeborg Nilsson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.