Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Implementation and Evaluation of a Theory-Based Resource Integration Project in China Cover

Improving Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Implementation and Evaluation of a Theory-Based Resource Integration Project in China

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Elements of the multifaceted resource integration project.

RESOURCE INTEGRATION STRATEGYINITIAL RECOGNITION AND EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION STAGEFAST TRIAGE AND PRELIMINARY DIAGNOSIS STAGERAPID IMAGING AND THROMBOLYSIS ADMINISTRATION STAGE
Operand resource integrationSharing stroke ambulance with emergency centerSetting up neuro emergencyThrombotic drugs stored in the CT room
Operant resource integration
Information-collectionCommunity education
EMS staff training
Training stroke emergency nurses
Training emergency triage nurses
Using stroke screening tools
Using a electronic wristband
Rapid acquisition of brain imaging
Information-sharingPre-notification by EMSSingle-call activation
Stroke code activation
Structured information sharing by multimedia instant messenger group
Decision-making\Rapid triage protocol
Transport of patients by EMS directly to the scanner
Rapid interpretation of brain imaging
Thrombolysis administering in the scanner/imaging area

[i] CT indicates computerized tomography and EMS, emergency medical services.

Figure 1

Conceptual framework of the project. This framework includes two dimensions composed of resource integration strategies (including operant resource integration and operand resource integration) and intravenous thrombolysis treatment processes (including recognition and emergency transportation stage, triage and preliminary diagnosis, imaging and thrombolysis administration).

Figure 2

Flowchart of the new treatment process. The new treatment process is designed in parallel. Tasks in different stages are clearly assigned to each of the members of the acute stroke treatment team.

Table 2

Characteristics of Patients in Pre-intervention and Post-intervention.

PRE-INTERVENTION (N = 121)POST-INTERVENTION (N = 398)P VALUE
Age (y), (mean ± SD)67.6 ± 11.466.2 ± 11.90.240
Female (%)46 (38.0)143 (35.9)0.676
Transferred by EMS (%)35 (28.9)131 (32.9)0.410
Baseline NIHSS, median (IQR)4 (3–11)4 (2-10)0.080
Prior Stroke/TIA (%)21 (17.4)82 (20.6)0.433
Hypertension (%)72 (59.5)211 (53.0)0.209
Diabetes mellitus (%)26 (21.5)110 (27.6)0.178
Atrial fibrillation (%)17 (14.0)55 (13.8)0.949
Coronary heart disease (%)20 (16.5)49 (12.3)0.231
Current Smoker (%)63 (52.1)192 (48.2)0.461

[i] P values are from t test or a Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. IQR, interquartile range; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Figure 3

Statistical Process Control chart of monthly average door-to-needle times. Blue double arrow line shows the timing of the intervention. Black arrows show the timing of interventions: a. Ambulance sharing, neuro emergency establishing, stroke emergency and emergency triage nurse training, screening tool using, single-call activation, stroke code activation, rapid acquisition of brain imaging, thrombotic drugs storing in the CT room, transport of patients by EMS directly to the scanner, thrombolysis administering in the imaging area were implemented in July; b. Pre-notification by EMS, electronic wristband, rapid triage protocol, rapid interpretation of brain imaging were implemented in September; c. Community education, EMS staff training, structured information sharing by multimedia instant messenger group were implemented in November. DNT, door-to-needle times; CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit.

Table 3

Time Between ED Arrival and Thrombolysis Administration (Categorical Door-to-Needle Time in Minutes).

PREINTERVENTION (N = 121)POSTINTERVENTION (N = 398)UNADJUSTED ODDS RATIOP VALUEADJUSTED ODDS RATIOP VALUE
<60 min (%)54 (44.6)337 (84.7)6.85 (4.37–10.75)<0.0017.31 (4.59–11.63)<0.001
<45 min (%)21 (17.4)276 (69.4)10.77 (6.43–18.05)<0.00111.93 (7.04–20.20)<0.001
<30 min (%)3 (2.5)109 (27.4)14.84 (4.62–47.65)<0.00114.84 (4.62–47.65)<0.001

[i] Multivariable models include adjustment for age, sex, medical insurance, baseline NIHSS score, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, prior stroke and current smoker.

Table 4

Patient outcome (mRs at 90 days).

PREINTERVENTION (N = 106)POSTINTERVENTION (N = 311)UNADJUSTED ODDS RATIOP VALUEADJUSTED ODDS RATIOP VALUE
mRs 0–1 (%)57 (53.8)183 (58.8)1.12 (0.59-1.85)0.3261.27 (0.78–2.31)0.471
mRs 2–3 (%)17 (16.0)68 (21.9)1.44 (0.83-2.06)0.0741.35 (0.92–1.71)0.183
mRs 4–5 (%)27 (25.5)49 (15.8)1.83 (1.22-5.47)0.0291.62 (1.36–7.64)0.037
Mortality (%)5 (4.7)11 (3.5)1.13 (0.57-2.10)0.6290.94 (0.58–2.82)0.562

[i] Multivariable models include adjustment for age, sex, medical insurance, baseline NIHSS score, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, prior stroke and current smoker.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5616 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 28, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 27, 2022
Published on: Feb 8, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Qian Fu, Xiaojun Wang, Donglan Zhang, Lu Shi, Wei Wang, Zhangbao Guo, Ping Shan, Guohua Chen, Zhanchun Feng, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.