Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model-Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q)

Astrid Jörns-Presentati; Gunter Groen; Atle Ødegård

doi:10.5334/ijic.5660

Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model-Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q)

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 4

By: Astrid Jörns-Presentati , Gunter Groen and Atle Ødegård

Open Access

|Oct 2021

Abstract

Objective: The Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration-Model Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q) measures professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in the field of child and youth mental health. The aim of this study was to validate the PINCOM-Q in a sample of German child welfare and child and youth mental health professionals.

Methods: The PINCOM-Q was translated into German and its underlying factor structure was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results and discussion: Findings from this study suggest four factors (Interprofessional Climate, Conflict, Role Expectancy and Shared Goals, and Motivation) capture the concept of perceptions of interprofessional collaboration between child welfare and child and adolescent psychiatry.

Conclusion: The use of PINCOM-Q (German) can be recommended as a research tool, investigating professional groups working with children and young people with multiple and complex needs.

References

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017 Jun 22 [cited 2020 Jul 27]; 2017(6). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481564/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper M, Evans Y, Pybis J. Interagency collaboration in children and young people’s mental health: a systematic review of outcomes, facilitating factors and inhibiting factors. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2016 May; 42(3): 325–42. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12322
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Vaughn-Coaxum RA, Ugueto AM, Eckshtain D, et al. Are Psychotherapies for Young People Growing Stronger? Tracking Trends Over Time for Youth Anxiety, Depression, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Conduct Problems. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 2019; 14(2): 216–37. DOI: 10.1177/1745691618805436
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet (London, England). 2007 Apr 14; 369(9569): 1302–13. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60368-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bronsard G, Alessandrini M, Fond G, Loundou A, Auquier P, Tordjman S, et al. The Prevalence of Mental Disorders Among Children and Adolescents in the Child Welfare System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine. 2016 Feb; 95(7): e2622. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002622
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burns BJ, Phillips SD, Wagner HR, Barth RP, Kolko DJ, Campbell Y, et al. Mental health need and access to mental health services by youths involved with child welfare: a national survey. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2004 Aug; 43(8): 960–70. DOI: 10.1097/01.chi.0000127590.95585.65
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stanley N, Riordan D, Alaszewski H. The mental health of looked after children: matching response to need. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2005 May; 13(3): 239–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00556.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bai Y, Wells R, Hillemeier MM. Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health providers, children’s service use, and outcomes. Child abuse & neglect [Internet]. 2009 Jun [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 33(6): 372–81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2694225/. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hurlburt MS, Leslie LK, Landsverk J, Barth RP, Burns BJ, Gibbons RD, et al. Contextual Predictors of Mental Health Service Use Among Children Open to Child Welfare. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004; 61(12): 1217–24. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1217
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nooteboom LA, Mulder EA, Kuiper CHZ, Colins OF, Vermeiren RRJM. Towards Integrated Youth Care: A Systematic Review of Facilitators and Barriers for Professionals. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research [Internet]. 2020 May 18 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01049-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Timonen-Kallio E. Interprofessional collaboration between residential child care and mental care practitioners: a cross-country study in six European countries. European Journal of Social Work [Internet]. 2019 Nov 2 [cited 2020 Nov 22]; 22(6): 947–60. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1441135
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Steene H, van West D, Peeraer G, Glazemakers I. Professionals’ views on the development process of a structural collaboration between child and adolescent psychiatry and child welfare: an exploration through the lens of the life cycle model. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2018 Dec; 27(12): 1539–49. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-018-1147-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ødegård A. Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in relation to children with mental health problems. A pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005 Aug; 19(4): 347–57. DOI: 10.1080/13561820500148437
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ødegård A. Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. International Journal of Integrated Care [Internet]. 2006 Dec 18 [cited 2015 May 2]; 6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762090/. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.165
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ødegård A, Strype J. Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration within child mental health care in Norway. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2009 May; 23(3): 286–96. DOI: 10.1080/13561820902739981
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strype J, Gundhus H, Egge M, Ødegård A. Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration. Professions and Professionalism. 2014 Oct 21; 4. DOI: 10.7577/pp.806
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R. Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov; 28(6): 501–6. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2014.939744
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseau C, Laurin-Lamothe A, Nadeau L, Deshaies S, Measham T. Measuring the quality of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health collaborative care. International Journal of Integrated Care [Internet]. 2012 Feb 10 [cited 2020 Feb 7]; 12. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287319/. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.676
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hynek KA, Malmberg-Heimonen I, Tøge AG. Improving interprofessional collaboration in Norwegian primary schools: A cluster-randomized study evaluating effects of the LOG model on teachers’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care [Internet]. 2020 Jan 13 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 0(0): 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1708281
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacob J, Boshoff K, Stanley R, Stewart H, Wiles L. Interprofessional collaboration within teams comprised of health and other professionals: a systematic review of measurement tools and their psychometric properties. 2017; 14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Groen G, Jörns-Presentati A. Grenzgänger kooperative Abstimmung von Hilfen für Kinder und Jugendliche zwischen Kinder- und Jugendhilfe und Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie. Köln: Psychiatrie Verlag; 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993 Dec; 46(12): 1417–32. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1914050.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ [Internet]. 2011 Jun 27 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 2: 53–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205511/. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2020 Nov 24]; 19(3): 235–58. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199805%2919%3A3%3C235%3A%3AAID-JOB837%3E3.0.CO%3B2-C.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. 1995; 99–136.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika [Internet]. 1974 Mar 1 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 39(1): 31–6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291575
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. [cited 2020 Nov 23]. Available from: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol10/iss1/7/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cattell RB. The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences [Internet]. New York: Plenum Press; 1978 [cited 2020 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.worldcat.org/title/scientific-use-of-factor-analysis-in-behavioral-and-life-sciences/oclc/3204221. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2262-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007. xxvii, 980 p. (Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 048(i02). Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/jss/jstsof/v048i02.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal [Internet]. 1999 Jan 1 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 6(1): 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall. 2010; 830.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. 2011; 489.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kebe, NNMK, Chiocchio F, Bamvita J-M, Fleury M-J. Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams. BMC Family Practice [Internet]. 2020 Jan 8 [cited 2020 Nov 24]; 21(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1076-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reeves S, Xyrichis A, Zwarenstein M. Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care [Internet]. 2018 Jan 2 [cited 2020 Feb 7]; 32(1): 1–3. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ambrose-Miller W, Ashcroft R. Challenges Faced by Social Workers as Members of Interprofessional Collaborative Health Care Teams: Table 1. Health & Social Work [Internet]. 2016 May [cited 2018 May 8]; 41(2): 101–9. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/hsw/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/hsw/hlw006. DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlw006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Widmark C, Sandahl C, Piuva K, Bergman D. What do we think about them and what do they think about us? Social representations of interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in the welfare sector. J Interprof Care. 2016; 30(1): 50–5. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1055716
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Boyle B. The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation. Small Group Research [Internet]. 2009 Oct 1 [cited 2020 Feb 10]; 40(5): 535–54. DOI: 10.1177/1046496409338302
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Willumsen E, Hallberg L. Interprofessional collaboration with young people in residential care: some professional perspectives. Journal of Interprofessional Care [Internet]. 2003 Jan 1 [cited 2015 May 8]; 17(4): 389–400. Available from: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13561820310001608212. DOI: 10.1080/13561820310001608212
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005 May; 19 Suppl 1: 8–20. DOI: 10.1080/13561820500081604
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ndibu Muntu Keba Kebe N, Chiocchio F, Bamvita J-M, Fleury M-J. Profiling mental health professionals in relation to perceived interprofessional collaboration on teams. SAGE Open Med [Internet]. 2019 Mar 29 [cited 2020 Nov 16]; 7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444404/. DOI: 10.1177/2050312119841467
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rumping S, Boendermaker L, Ruyter DJ de. Stimulating interdisciplinary collaboration among youth social workers: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 27]; 27(2): 293–305. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hsc.12589. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12589
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rauvola RS, Briggs EP, Hinyard LJ. Nomology, validity, and interprofessional research: The missing link(s). Journal of Interprofessional Care [Internet]. 2020 Jul 3 [cited 2020 Nov 23]; 34(4): 545–56. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1712333
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5660 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Submitted on: Dec 2, 2020

Accepted on: Oct 15, 2021

Published on: Oct 27, 2021

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

child welfare,

child and adolescent psychiatry,

interprofessional collaboration,

validation,

measurement

© 2021 Astrid Jörns-Presentati, Gunter Groen, Atle Ødegård, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 21 (2021): Issue 4