Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
References
- Secretary of State for Health The new NHS 1997 London Stationery Office
- Scott D Inter-organisational collaboration in family-centred practice: a framework for analysis and action Australian Social Work 2005 58 2 132 41
- Mackay L Soothill K Webb C Soothill K Mackay L Webb C Troubled times: the context of interprofessional collaboration Interprofessional relations in health care 1995 London Edward Arnold
- Hudson B Collaboration in Social Welfare: a framework for analysis Policy and Politics 1987 15 3 175 82
- Roberts CM Buckingham RJ Stone RA Lowe D Pearson MG The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP)—A feasibility study of large scale clinical service peer review Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice [in press]
- Roberts CM Stone RA Buckingham RJ Pursey NA Harrison BDW Lowe D A randomised trial of peer review: The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project Clinical Medicine 2010 10 3 223 7
- Price LC Lowe D Hosker HSR Anstey K Pearson MG Roberts CM UK National COPD Audit 2003: impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerbation Thorax 2006 10 61 837 42
- Roberts CM Lowe D Barnes S Pearson MG A prospective study of the practical issues of local involvement in national audit of COPD Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2004 10 2 281 90
- Royal College of Physicians and British Thoracic Society Report of the 2003 National COPD Audit Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit (ed) 2004 London Royal College of Physicians
- Page RL Harrison BD Interdepartmental peer review British Medical Journal 1997 314 7083 765 6
- Goacher B Evans J Walton J Wedell K Policy and provision for special educational needs: implementing the 1981 Education Act 1988 London Cassell
- Smith WR An explanation of theories that guide evidence-based interventions to improve quality Clinical Governance: An International Journal 2000 8 3 247 54
- Smith J Redesigning health care British Medical Journal 2001 322 7297 1257 8
- Braun V Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006 3 77 101
- Glaser BG Strauss SA The discovery of grounded theory 1967 Chicago Aldine Publishing Company
- Bromley DG Shupe AD Ventimiglia JC Atrocity tales, the Unification Church and the social construction of evil Journal of Communication 1979 29 42 53
- D'Amour D Ferrada-Videla M Martin-Rodriguez LS Beaulieu MD The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005 19 Suppl 1 116 31
- Goffman E The presentation of self in everyday life 1959 Garden City, New York Doubleday
- Farmakopoulou N What lies underneath? An inter-organizational analysis of collaboration between education and social work British Journal of Social Work 2002 32 8 1051 66
- Buchanan D Boddy D The expertise of the change agent: public performance and backstage activity 1992 Hemel Hempstead Prentice-Hall
- Higgins DB Merger and autonomy: reaping the benefits of both Health Progress 1987 Jan–Feb 68 1 87 93
- Gilbert DT Malone PS The correspondence bias Psychological Bulletin 1995 117 21 38
- Wilson T Berwick DM Cleary PM What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 2003 29 2 85 93
- Pinnock H Huby G Tierney A Hamilton S Powell A Kielmann T Is multidisciplinary teamwork the key? A qualitative study of the development of respiratory services in the UK Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2009 102 9 378 90
- Willcocks S Conway T Strategic marketing and clinical management in health care: a possible way forward Journal of Management in Medicine 1998 12 2 120 34
- Mueller F Sillince J Harvey C Howorth C ‘A rounded picture is what we need’: rhetorical strategies, arguments, and the negotiation of change in a UK hospital trust Organization Studies 2004 25 1 75 93
- Kitchener M Kirkpatrick I Whipp R Supervising professional work under new public management: evidence from an “invisible trade” British Journal of Management 2000 11 3 213 26
- Preston D Loan-Clarke J The NHS manager, a view from the bridge Journal of Management in Medicine 2000 14 2 100 8
- Pettigrew A Ferlie E McKee L Shaping strategic change—the case of the NHS in the 1980s Public Money and Management 1992 7 12 3 27 31
- Nembhard IM Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most? Health Services Research 2009 44 2 359 78
- Our health, our care, our say a new direction for community services; supporting people with long-term conditions: an NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration 2005 London Department of Health
- Edwards N Fraser SW Clinical networks: a discussion paper 2001 London NHS Confederation
- Perkins N Smith K Hunter DJ Bambra C Joyce K What counts is what works'? New Labour and partnerships in public health Policy and Politics 2010 38 1 101 17
- Klazinga N Lombarts K van Everdingen J Quality management in the medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 1998 5 24 5 240 50
- Li S Doing criticism in ‘symbiotic niceness’: a study of palliative care nurses' talk Social Science and Medicine 2005 60 9 1949 59
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.573 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 4, 2010
Accepted on: Aug 23, 2010
Published on: Sep 29, 2010
Published by: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
© 2010 Carol Rivas, Stephen Abbott, Stephanie J.C. Taylor, Aileen Clarke, C. Michael Roberts, Robert Stone, Chris Griffiths, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.