Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Supporting Women Exit Sex Work: A Contribution Analysis of the Exit Doors Here Integrated Care Program in Toronto, Canada Cover

Supporting Women Exit Sex Work: A Contribution Analysis of the Exit Doors Here Integrated Care Program in Toronto, Canada

Open Access
|Mar 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Logic model for the Exit Doors Here program.

* We would expect “short term outcomes” to occur over the course of the 9-month program, “medium term outcomes” to occur after the end of the program, and “long term outcomes” to occur years after the program has ended.

Table 1

Baseline socio-demographic characteristics and sex work involvement for 55 women enrolled in the Exit Doors Here evaluation, Toronto, Canada, 2018–2022.

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICn (%)
Age group
    18–34 years-old21 (38)
    35–55 years-old29 (53)
    56 years and older5 (9)
Born in Canada47 (86)
Ethnic backgrounda
    Caucasian27 (49)
    Indigenous5 (9)
    Other21 (38)
    Declined to answer2 (4)
Highest education level completed
    Grade 10 or below11 (20)
    Grade 11–1310 (18)
    High school11 (20)
    College or trades school18 (33)
    University5 (9)
Have children, yes35 (64)
Housing arrangements (n = 47)
    Living in an apartment or house14 (30)
    Living in a shelter5 (11)
    Living in ‘other’ arrangementsb14 (30)
    Homeless4 (8)
    Missingc10 (21)
Employment status
    Employed13 (24)
    Unemployed42 (76)
Before-tax income
    $15,000 or less37 (66)
    $15,000–$25,00011 (20)
    $25,000 or more4 (7)
    Declined to answer3 (7)
Sex work involvement
Involved in sex work
    Yes52 (95)
    No, but at risk of returning2 (4)
    Missing1 (2)
Type(s) of sex work
    Private18 (33)
    Street-based9 (16)
    Combination22 (40)
    Other (trafficked, escorting, not self-identified)6 (11)

[i] a “Other” includes Black, South East Asian, Arab, Latin American and mixed backgrounds.

b “Other” includes transitional housing and residential treatment center.

c Eight women did not select “housing” as a focus area and were not asked about housing.

Table 2

Proportion of participants who reached each key milestone, by CTI focus area.

MILESTONE REACHEDn (%)
Pre-employment, n = 34
    Explored employment interests with case manager16 (47)
    Connected with host organization’s employment counsellor10 (29)
    Connected with external employment agencies15 (44)
    Signed up for volunteer positions with program or external agencies9 (26)
    Signed up for entrepreneurial programs11 (33)
Housing, n = 31
    Connected with program housing worker25 (81)
    Connected with external housing worker17 (55)
    Was considered for Special Priority Program housing22 (71)
    Secured housing18 (58)
    Filled housing application, but awaiting decision or accommodation availability7 (23)
Income, n = 10
    Received support with budgeting6 (60)
    Received support filing income tax5 (50)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7700 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 14, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 7, 2024
Published on: Mar 25, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Martine Shareck, Pearl Buhariwala, Maha Hassan, Ermelina Balla, Patricia O’Campo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.