Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of Integrated Care for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Cardiovascular and Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cover

Effectiveness of Integrated Care for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Cardiovascular and Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Rainbow model for integrated care [22].

Figure 2

Flowchart of search strategy and study selection process.

Table 1

Clusters of integrated care interventions [9].

RAINBOW MODEL INTERVENTIONS CHARACTERISATIONTOTAL STUDIESCLUSTER 1: PATIENT EMPOWERMENTCLUSTER 2: NETWORK CARE COORDINATIONCLUSTER DIFFERENCES
N (%)54 (100%)22 (41%)32 (59%)
Organizational level
  • Disease management

34 (63%)6 (27%)28 (88%)0.000***
  • Managed care programs

10 (19%)4 (18%)6 (19%)1.000
  • Electronic patient registry

15 (28%)1 (5%)14 (44%)0.002**
  • Clinical information transmission

7 (13%)3 (14%)4 (13%)1.000
Professional domain
  • Multidisciplinary team

41 (76%)11 (50%)30 (94%)0.001***
  • Continuity of care

28 (52%)6 (27%)22 (69%)0.005**
  • Clinician education

27 (50%)13 (59%)14 (44%)0.41
  • Audit and feedback

9 (17%)2 (9%)7 (22%)0.28
  • Clinician reminders

9 (17%)2 (9%)6 (19%)0.45
Patient domain
  • Case management

33 (61%)1 (5%)31 (97%)0.000***
  • Integrated care pathway

24 (44%)4 (18%)20 (63%)0.002***
  • Discharge management

15 (28%)4 (18%)11 (34%)0.23
  • Self-management

26 (48%)14 (64%)12 (38%)0.09
  • Patient education

25 (46%)13 (59%)12 (38%)0.17
  • Patient reminders

3 (6%)2 (9%)1 (3%)0.56

[i] **Significant level < 0.01.

***Significant level < 0.001.

Figure 3

Summary risks of bias in included studies.

Figure 4

Effect of integrated care on all-cause mortality.

Table 2

Summary of findings and assessment of quality of evidence for outcomes.

CERTAINTY ASSESSMENTN OF PATIENTSEFFECTCERTAINTY
N OF STUDIESSTUDY DESIGNRISK OF BIASINCONSISTENCYINDIRECTNESSIMPRECISIONOTHER CONSIDERATIONS[INTERVENTION][COMPARISON]RELATIVE (95% CI)ABSOLUTE (95% CI)
PRIMARY OUTCOMES
All-cause mortality (follow-up: mean 39 weeks)
6randomised trialsseriousanot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone56/1334 (4.2%)97/1347 (7.2%)  RR 0.60 (0.44 to 0.81)29 fewer per 1.000(from 14 fewer to 44 fewer)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
All-cause hospital admissions (follow-up: mean 39 weeks)
6randomised trialsseriousaseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone429/1334 (32.2%)659/1347 (48.9%)  RR 0.63(0.56 to 0.71)181 fewer per 1,000 (from 142 fewer to 215 fewer)⨁⨁◯◯ Low
Adverse events (follow-up: mean 45.5 weeks)
4randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone143/1251
(11.4%)
177/1108 (16.0%)  RR 0.53(0.27 to 1.05)75 fewer per 1.000(from 8 fewer to 117 fewer)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
Healthcare use (follow-up: mean 52 weeks)
3randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousseriouscnone135132-SMD 0.3 SD higher (0.05 lower to 1.10 higher)⨁⨁◯◯ Low
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Quality of life (follow-up: mean 35 weeks)
15randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone22782180-SMD 0.38 SD higher (0.03 higher to 0.73 higher)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
Physical functioning (follow-up: mean 34 weeks)
19randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone20621843-SMD 0.17 SD higher (0.03 higher to 0.30 higher)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
Weight management (follow-up: median 45 weeks)
10randomised trialsseriousaseriousbnot seriousseriouscnone902693-SMD 0.08 SD higher (0.07 lower to 0.24 higher)⨁◯◯◯ Very low
Mental health (follow-up: mean 35 weeks)
20randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone23192083-SMD 0.29 SD higher (0.12 higher to 0.46 higher)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
Self-management (follow-up: mean 30 weeks)
13randomised trialsnot seriousseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone14871304-SMD 0.3 SD higher (0.10 higher to 0.50 higher)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate
TERTIARY OUTCOMES
HbA1c (follow-up: mean 40 weeks)
15randomised trialsseriousaseriousbnot seriousnot seriousnone947865-SMD 0.45 SD higher (0.15 higher to 0.75 higher)⨁⨁◯◯ Low
Cholesterol (follow-up: mean 52 weeks)
6randomised trialsseriousanot seriousnot seriousseriouscnone590376-SMD 0.02 SD lower (0.12 lower to 0.07 higher)⨁⨁◯◯ Low
Pulmonary measures (follow-up: mean 264 weeks)
4randomised trialsseriousanot seriousnot seriousseriouscnone713785-SMD 0.17 SD higher (0.16 lower to 0.49 higher)⨁⨁◯◯ Low
Blood pressure control (follow-up: mean 50 weeks)
11randomised trialsseriousanot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone16011395-SMD 0.11 SD higher (0.00 to 0.21 higher)⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate

[i] CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; SMD: standardised mean difference.

Explanations

  1. Most of the studies have high frequency of other bias.

  2. Large heterogeneity between studies (I2>50%).

  3. 95% CI includes possible benefits from both control and health interventions.

Figure 5

Effect of integrated care on all-cause hospitalization.

Figure 6

Effect of integrated care on adverse events.

Figure 7

Effect of integrated care on healthcare use.

Figure 8

Effect of integrated care on quality of life.

Figure 9

Effect of integrated care on physical functioning.

Figure 10

Effect of integrated care on weight management.

Figure 11

Effect of integrated care on mental health.

Figure 12

Effect of integrated care on self-management.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7744 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 8, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2024
Published on: Aug 19, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Pim P. Valentijn, Liza Tymchenko, Wiro Gruisen, Bem Bruls, Fernando Abdalla Pereira, Rosa Y. Arends, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.