Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Discriminating Global Orientation of Two Element Sets Cover

Discriminating Global Orientation of Two Element Sets

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

A. Elements types for Experiment 1 at each level of rotation. For rotated conditions, one of the two possible orientations (clockwise or counterclockwise, relative to base orientation) was pseudo-randomly selected. B. Examples of stimuli at each level of rotation.

Figure 2

Mean selection of base orientation as a function of element rotation; error bars represent SEM.

Figure 3

A. Element types for Experiment 2 at each level of Set 2 rotation. B. Examples of stimuli at each proportion of Set 1. In each case shown here, Set 1 elements are aligned to base orientation, and Set 2 element are rotated 45º.

Figure 4

Effects of introducing aligned element among the field of rotated elements. Each Set 1 proportion is indicated with color and shape. A. Selection of base orientation as a function of Set 2 rotation. Black circles depict results for single-element condition. B. Relative effect of two-element set (two-element set minus one-element set).

Figure 5

Shown here is an example where Set 2 rotation is 67º, whereas measurements were made with Set 2 rotation set to 0º, 23º, 34º, 45º, 56º, and 67º. A. Element types for Experiment 3 at each level of Set 1 rotation. B. Examples of stimuli. In each case, Set 1 proportion is 60%.

Figure 6

Performance for each level of Set 1 rotation. Each Set 2 rotation is indicated with color and shape. A and C: Selection of base orientation as a function of Set 2 rotation. Black circles depict results for the single-element condition. B and D: Relative effect of two-element set (two-element set minus one-element set). Top graphs depict results with 60% Set 1 proportion; bottom row with 80% Set 1 proportion.

Table 1

Summary of stimulus parameters for each experiment.

Set 1 Proportion (%)Set 1 Rotation (°)Set 2 Proportion (%)Set 2 Rotation (°)
Experiment 11000
10012
10023
10034
10045
Experiment 21000
8002023, 45, 56, 67, 78, 90
6004023, 45, 56, 67, 78, 90
4006023, 45, 56, 67, 78, 90
2008023, 45, 56, 67, 78, 90
Experiment 3800200, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
8023200, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
8034200, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
8045200, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
600400, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
6023400, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
6034400, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
6045400, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.127 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 22, 2020
Published on: Oct 13, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Aytaç Karabay, Daniel D. Kurylo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.