Pointing to the Future of Language Research

Michael Long; Katherine Chia; Michael P. Kaschak

doi:10.5334/joc.162

Pointing to the Future of Language Research

Journal of Cognition

Volume 4 (2021): Issue 1

By: Michael Long , Katherine Chia and Michael P. Kaschak

Open Access

|Aug 2021

Abstract

Murgiano et al. (2021) argue that indexicality and iconicity play a larger role in language than is typically acknowledged. They further call for a more situated view of language. We agree with the basic arguments laid out in their paper. In this commentary, we suggest that an embodied approach to language might provide a useful theoretical framework for developing a situated account of language.

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In G. B. Flores d’Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The Process of Language Understanding. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark, H. H. (1997). Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567–589. DOI: 10.1080/01638539709545003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferreira, F., & Yang, Z. (2019). The problem of comprehension in psycholinguistics. Discourse Processes, 56, 485–495. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1591885
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X97000010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 436–441. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194085
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Warren, C. M. (2008). Kicking calculators: Contribution of embodied representations to sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 256–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yu, C. S. P., McBeath, M. K., & Glenberg, A. M. (in press). The Gleam-Glum effect: /i:/ vs /˄/ phonemes generically carry emotional valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.162 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Submitted on: Apr 6, 2021

Accepted on: Apr 23, 2021

Published on: Aug 23, 2021

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

Embodied cognition,

Action and perception,

Action

© 2021 Michael Long, Katherine Chia, Michael P. Kaschak, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 4 (2021): Issue 1